用户名: 密码: 验证码:
Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferenceson=""1.0"" encoding=""UTF-8""?>

Summary

Background

Erlotinib has been shown to improve progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy when given as first-line treatment for Asian patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of erlotinib compared with standard chemotherapy for first-line treatment of European patients with advanced EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC.

Methods

We undertook the open-label, randomised phase 3 EURTAC trial at 42 hospitals in France, Italy, and Spain. Eligible participants were adults (>18 years) with NSCLC and EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation in exon 21) with no history of chemotherapy for metastatic disease (neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy ending ? months before study entry was allowed). We randomly allocated participants (1:1) according to a computer-generated allocation schedule to receive oral erlotinib 150 mg per day or 3 week cycles of standard intravenous chemotherapy of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2 on day 1) or gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8). Carboplatin (AUC 6 with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 or AUC 5 with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2) was allowed in patients unable to have cisplatin. Patients were stratified by EGFR mutation type and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs 1 vs 2). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population. We assessed safety in all patients who received study drug (? dose). This study is registered with , number .

Findings

Between Feb 15, 2007, and Jan 4, 2011, 174 patients with EGFR mutations were enrolled. One patient received treatment before randomisation and was thus withdrawn from the study; of the remaining patients, 86 were randomly assigned to receive erlotinib and 87 to receive standard chemotherapy. The preplanned interim analysis showed that the study met its primary endpoint; enrolment was halted, and full evaluation of the results was recommended. At data cutoff (Jan 26, 2011), median PFS was 9¡¤7 months (95 % CI 8¡¤4-12¡¤3) in the erlotinib group, compared with 5¡¤2 months (4¡¤5-5¡¤8) in the standard chemotherapy group (hazard ratio 0¡¤37, 95 % CI 0¡¤25-0¡¤54; p<0¡¤0001). Main grade 3 or 4 toxicities were rash (11 [13 % ] of 84 patients given erlotinib vs none of 82 patients in the chemotherapy group), neutropenia (none vs 18 [22 % ]), anaemia (one [1 % ] vs three [4 % ]), and increased amino-transferase concentrations (two [2 % ] vs 0). Five (6 % ) patients on erlotinib had treatment-related severe adverse events compared with 16 patients (20 % ) on chemotherapy. One patient in the erlotinib group and two in the standard chemotherapy group died from treatment-related causes.

Interpretation

Our findings strengthen the rationale for routine baseline tissue-based assessment of EGFR mutations in patients with NSCLC and for treatment of mutation-positive patients with EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors.

Funding

Spanish Lung Cancer Group, Roche Farma, Hoffmann-La Roche, and Red Tem¨¢tica de Investigacion Cooperativa en Cancer.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700