ACR Appropriateness Criteria Follow-Up of Malignant or Aggressive Musculoskeletal Tumors

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Catherine C. Roberts ; MD^a ; ^{roberts.catherine@mayo.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Mark J. Kransdorf ; MD^a ; Francesca D. Beaman ; MD^b ; Ronald S. Adler ; MD ; PhD^c ; Behrang Amini ; MD ; PhD^d ; Marc Appel ; MD^e ; Stephanie A. Bernard ; MD^f ; Ian Blair Fries ; MD^g ; Isabelle M. Germano ; MD^h ; Bennett S. Greenspan ; MD ; MSⁱ ; Langston T. Holly ; MD^j ; Charlotte D. Kubicky ; MD ; PhD^k ; Simon Shek-Man Lo ; MB ; ChB^l ; Timothy J. Mosher ; MD^f ; Andrew E. Sloan ; MD^m ; Michael J. Tuite ; MDⁿ ; Eric A. Walker ; MD^f ; Robert J. Ward ; MD^o ; Daniel E. Wessell ; MD^p ; Barbara N. Weissman ; MD^q
• 关键词：Appropriateness Criteria ; musculoskeletal tumors ; malignant ; aggressive ; follow-up ; imaging
• 刊名：Journal of the American College of Radiology
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：April 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：13
• 期：4
• 页码：389-400
• 全文大小：254 K

文摘

Appropriate imaging modalities for the follow-up of malignant or aggressive musculoskeletal tumors include radiography, MRI, CT, ¹⁸F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/CT, ^99mTc bone scan, and ultrasound. Clinical scenarios reviewed include evaluation for metastatic disease to the lung in low- and high-risk patients, for osseous metastatic disease in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, for local recurrence of osseous tumors with and without significant hardware present, and for local recurrence of soft tissue tumors. The timing for follow-up of pulmonary metastasis surveillance is also reviewed.

The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every three years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.