Remotely-sensed imagery vs. eye-level photography: Evaluating associations among measurements of tree cover density
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Bin Jianga ; jiangbin@hku.hk" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding authorAuthor Vitae ; Brian Dealb ; deal@illinois.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding authorAuthor Vitae ; HaoZhi Panb ; hpan8@illiois.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding authorAuthor Vitae ; Linda Larsenc ; lflarsen@illinois.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding authorAuthor Vitae ; Chung-Heng Hsiehd ; wn1172@hotmail.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding authorAuthor Vitae ; Chun-Yen Change ; cycmail@ntu.edu.tw" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding authorAuthor Vitae ; William C. Sullivanf ; wcsulliv@illinois.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding authorAuthor Vitae
- 关键词：Urban forestry ; Tree cover density ; Remotely-sensed imagery ; Eye-level photography ; Association
- 刊名：Landscape and Urban Planning
- 出版年：2017
- 出版时间：January 2017
- 年：2017
- 卷：157
- 期：Complete
- 页码：270-281
- 全文大小：1623 K
文摘
- •
Association between aerial and eye-level tree cover density (TCD) is inconsistent.
- •
The significance of association diminishes as tree canopy coverage increases.
- •
Planners should not rely solely on aerial TCD to evaluate urban forestry resources.
- •
Eye-level TCD should be emphasized at strategic spots.
- •
Eye-level photographs and site visits are still indispensable tools for evaluating sites.