Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) reality criteria in adults: A meta-analytic review

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Bá ; rbara G. Amado^a ; Ramó ; n Arce^a ; ^{ramon.arce@usc.es" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Francisca Fariñ ; a^b ; Manuel Vilariñ ; o^a
• 关键词：Criteria-Based Content Analysis ; Adults ; Statements ; Credibility ; Meta-analysis
• 刊名：International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：May-August 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：16
• 期：2
• 页码：201-210
• 全文大小：524 K

文摘

Background/Objective: Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) is the tool most extensively used worldwide for evaluating the veracity of a testimony. CBCA, initially designed for evaluating the testimonies of victims of child sexual abuse, has been empirically validated. Moreover, CBCA has been generalized to adult populations and other contexts though this generalization has not been endorsed by the scientific literature. Method: Thus, a meta-analysis was performed to assess the Undeutsch Hypothesis and the CBCA checklist of criteria in discerning in adults between memories of self-experienced real-life events and fabricated or fictitious memories. Results: Though the results corroborated the Undeutsch Hypothesis, and CBCA as a valid technique, the results were not generalizable, and the self-deprecation and pardoning the perpetrator criteria failed to discriminate between both memories. The technique can be complemented with additional reality criteria. The study of moderators revealed discriminating efficacy was significantly higher in filed studies on sexual offences and intimate partner violence. Conclusions: The findings are discussed in terms of their implications as well as the limitations and conditions for applying these results to forensic settings.