Irrigation of Continent Catheterizable Ileal Pouches: Tap Water Can Replace Sterile Solutions Because It Is Safe, Easy, and Economical

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Fré ; dé ; ric D. Birkhä ; user^a ; Pascal Zehnder^a ; Beat Roth^a ; Leander Schü ; rch^a ; Katharina Ochsner^a ; Rita Willener^a ; George N. Thalmann^a ; Fiona C. Burkhard^a ; Urs E. Studer ; ^a ; ^{urs.studer@insel.ch}
• 关键词：Continent urinary reservoir ; Urinary tract infection ; Irrigation ; Isotonic solution ; Water
• 刊名：European Urology
• 出版年：2011
• 出版时间：April 2011
• 年：2011
• 卷：59
• 期：4
• 页码：518-523
• 全文大小：299 K

文摘

Background

Continent catheterizable ileal pouches require regular irrigations to reduce the risk of bacteriuria and urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Objective

Our aim was to compare the UTI rate, patient friendliness, and costs of standard sterile irrigation versus irrigation with tap water.

Design, setting, and participants

Twenty-three patients participated in a prospective randomized two-arm crossover single-center trial. Aseptic intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) combined with sterile sodium chloride (NaCl) 0.9 % irrigation was compared with clean ISC and irrigation with tap water (H₂O) during two study periods of 90 d each.

Intervention

Patients underwent daily pouch irrigations with NaCl 0.9 % solution or tap water.

Measurements

Urine nitrite dipstick tests were evaluated daily; urine culture (UC) and patient friendliness were evaluated monthly. Costs were documented.

Results and limitations

A total of 3916 study days with nitrite testing and irrigation were analyzed, 1876 (48 % ) in the NaCl arm and 2040 (52 % ) in the H₂O arm. In the NaCl arm, 418 study days (22 % ) with nitrite-positive dipsticks were recorded, 219 d (11 % ) in the H₂O arm, significantly fewer (p = 0.01). Of the 149 UCs, 96 (64 % ) were positive, 48 in each arm, revealing a total of 16 different germs. All patients preferred the H₂O method. Monthly costs were up to 20 times lower in the H₂O arm.

Conclusions

Pouch irrigation with sterile NaCl 0.9 % solution and tap water had comparable rates of positive UC. Irrigation with tap water significantly lowered the incidence of nitrite-positive study days and was substantially less costly and more patient friendly than NaCl irrigation. We therefore recommend the use of tap water (or bottled water) instead of sterile NaCl 0.9 % solution for daily irrigation of continent catheterizable ileal pouches.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12610000618055, http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12610000618055.aspx.