Proctoring of New Emergency Radiologists to Promote Clinical Excellence and Ensure Quality of Care

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Michael S. Kelleher Jr. ; MD^a ; ^{m.kelleher@yale.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Howard P. Forman ; MD^a ; T. Rob Goodman ; MB BChir^a ; Jay K. Pahade ; MD^a
• 关键词：Emergency radiology ; quality improvement ; peer review
• 刊名：Journal of the American College of Radiology
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：August 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：13
• 期：8
• 页码：967-972
• 全文大小：129 K

文摘

The authors’ institution provides 24/7 attending radiologist final interpretations for all emergency, urgent, and inpatient studies. As a supplement to the existing emergency radiology faculty, the institution relies on two groups of radiologists to provide final imaging interpretations after hours: radiology fellows (RFs) and newly hired subspecialty radiologists (NRs). For both groups, subspecialty services provide overreads the following day to improve the skills of the staff members and ensure clinical excellence. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical significance and rate of discrepancies between RFs and NRs.

c_2">Methods

A retrospective review of all overreads from July 1, 2012, to June 30, 2015, was performed. Discrepancy rates for RFs and NRs were calculated. Error significance for cases requiring addenda was categorized as follows: acute, likely malignant, indeterminate, unlikely to be of clinical significance, insignificant typographic error, or significant typographic error.

c_3">Results

In total, 10,796 studies were rechecked, of which 1.9% (n = 205) required addenda, 3.6% (n = 384) were deemed addendum-optional, and 94.5% (n = 10,207) required no comments. There was no significant difference in cases requiring addenda (RFs, 1.7% [119 of 6,847]; NRs, 2.2% [86 of 3,949]; P = .11). Of the 205 cases requiring addenda, 21.0% (n = 43) were deemed to be acute, 4.9% (n = 10) likely malignant, 28.3% (n = 58) indeterminate, 32.7% (n = 67) unlikely to be of clinical significance, and 13.1% (n = 27) secondary to typographic errors (66.7% [n = 18] deemed to be significant).

c_4">Conclusions

After-hours coverage with RFs and NRs allows high-quality final, actionable interpretations with low discrepancy rates and no significant difference between both groups for addendum-needed cases. The program strikes a balance between the need for timely interpretations and the need to continually monitor and improve the quality of interpretations through subspecialist feedback.