Validation and usefulness of the Sperm Quality Analyzer V equine for equine semen analysis

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：M. Hoogewijs ; S. De Vliegher ; C. De Schauwer ; J. Govaere ; K. Smits ; G. Hoflack ; A. de Kruif ; A. Van Soom
• 关键词：me=""txt0010"">Computer assisted sperm analysisme=""txt0015""> ; Sperm quality analyzerme=""txt0020""> ; SQA-Veme=""txt0025""> ; Sperm qualityme=""txt0030""> ; Stallion
• 刊名：Theriogenology
• 出版年：2011
• 出版时间：1 January 2011
• 年：2011
• 卷：75
• 期：1
• 页码：189-194
• 全文大小：529 K

文摘

Routine semen analysis includes evaluation of concentration combined with seminal volume, morphology and motility. Subjective analysis of these parameters is known to be inaccurate, imprecise and subject to variability. Automated semen analysis could lead to an increased standardization in and between laboratories but for that to happen automated devices need to be validated. A new device, the sperm quality analyzer V equine (SQA-Ve) version 1.00.43, was evaluated for its repeatability and agreement with light microscopy (LM), for raw and extended equine semen. Results were compared with computer assisted sperm analysis (CASA), which was also tested for its repeatability and agreement with LM. The SQA-Ve showed a good repeatability and fine agreement for assessing sperm concentration of raw semen based on scatter and Bland-Altman plots. This was in contrast with the motility parameters, which had a low repeatability. Morphology assessment with SQA-Ve was poorly repeatable as well as in poor agreement with LM. For extended semen, the findings were comparable. The SQA-Ve did well for concentration, whereas for the motility parameters repeatability was only just acceptable, with no agreement with LM. This sharply contrasted the CASA findings that were highly repeatable and almost in perfect agreement with LM. Based on these findings, the tested version of the SQA-Ve is insufficiently accurate to be used for analyzing raw or extended equine semen.