Conceptualising environmental responsibility
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Manfred Lenzen ; Joy Murray
- 关键词：Supply chains ; Sales chains ; Downstream responsibility ; Input– ; output analysis ; Structural path analysis ; Scope 3 emissions ; Downstream emissions
- 刊名：Ecological Economics
- 出版年：2010
- 出版时间：15 December 2010
- 年：2010
- 卷：70
- 期：2
- 页码：261-270
- 全文大小：700 K
文摘
Downstream responsibility is rarely addressed in the academic literature and in corporate sustainability reporting. We conceptualise downstream responsibility for the example of carbon emissions, by establishing a terminology as well as a framework for quantifying downstream carbon footprints. By extracting emissions-intensive sales chains for a number of Australian industry sectors, and comparing these to emissions-intensive supply chains, we demonstrated the ability of input–output analysis to quantify emissions responsibility in both directions. We extend the definition of downstream responsibility beyond the product use and disposal phases, to include what we call “enabled” emissions. This term implies that whatever is sold downstream enables our customers to operate and emit, irrespective of whether it is our product that is combusted, or that directly combusts fuels, or not. Our structural path analyses and threshold-capture relationships reveal stark differences between industries with regard to the data collection efforts necessary to achieve a reasonably complete footprint assessment. Industries appear to have their own specific carbon footprint profiles, and one cannot design generic relevance tests that tell which data to collect. Moreover we conclude that current completeness standards in carbon reporting cannot be satisfied using relevance thresholds. Input–output analysis and structural path analysis are excellent tools that can help companies undertake screening exercises, which in turn help prioritising and streamlining the collection of data needed to establish a corporate downstream carbon footprint. Compared to conventional manual approaches, hybrid life-cycle assessments assisted by input–output analysis and structural path analysis achieve more complete results, with substantially less staff, money and time.