A local anisotropic adaptive algorithm for the solution of low-Mach transient combustion problems

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jaime Carpio^a ; ^{jaime.carpio@upm.es" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Juan Luis Prieto^a ; ^{juanluis.prieto@upm.es" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Marcos Vera^b ; ^{marcos.vera@uc3m.es" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}
• 关键词：Lagrange&ndash ; Galerkin schemes ; Finite element method ; Anisotropic refinement ; Transient combustion problems ; Flame/vortex interaction
• 刊名：Journal of Computational Physics
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：1 February 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：306
• 期：Complete
• 页码：19-42
• 全文大小：3892 K

文摘

A novel numerical algorithm for the simulation of transient combustion problems at low Mach and moderately high Reynolds numbers is presented. These problems are often characterized by the existence of a large disparity of length and time scales, resulting in the development of directional flow features, such as slender jets, boundary layers, mixing layers, or flame fronts. This makes local anisotropic adaptive techniques quite advantageous computationally. In this work we propose a local anisotropic refinement algorithm using, for the spatial discretization, unstructured triangular elements in a finite element framework. For the time integration, the problem is formulated in the context of semi-Lagrangian schemes, introducing the semi-Lagrange–Galerkin (SLG) technique as a better alternative to the classical semi-Lagrangian (SL) interpolation. The good performance of the numerical algorithm is illustrated by solving a canonical laminar combustion problem: the flame/vortex interaction. First, a premixed methane–air flame/vortex interaction with simplified transport and chemistry description (Test I) is considered. Results are found to be in excellent agreement with those in the literature, proving the superior performance of the SLG scheme when compared with the classical SL technique, and the advantage of using anisotropic adaptation instead of uniform meshes or isotropic mesh refinement. As a more realistic example, we then conduct simulations of non-premixed hydrogen–air flame/vortex interactions (Test II) using a more complex combustion model which involves state-of-the-art transport and chemical kinetics. In addition to the analysis of the numerical features, this second example allows us to perform a satisfactory comparison with experimental visualizations taken from the literature.