Evolutionary biology and the question of teleology

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Michael Ruse ^{mruse@fsu.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}
• 关键词：Thomas Nagel ; Teleology ; Final cause ; Charles Darwin ; Natural selection ; Arms race
• 刊名：Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：August 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：58
• 期：Complete
• 页码：100-106
• 全文大小：223 K

文摘

Teleology—what Aristotle called “final cause”—is trying to understand things in terms of the future, as when we ask about the plates on the back of the dinosaur, stegosaurus, and suggest that they might sometime be used to control the internal temperature of the brute. Recently the philosopher Thomas Nagel has argued for a wholesale embrace of teleological thinking in the sciences, particularly the life sciences. I argue that Nagel's thinking is shoddy and ill-informed, but that in some sense biologists do (with reason) seem drawn to teleological understanding, and so the correct response is not outright rejection of the very idea but a more informed and sympathetic approach to those aspects of nature that seem to call for final cause thinking.