Effect of Radial Versus Femoral Access on Radiation Dose and the Importance of Procedural Volume: A Substudy of the Multicenter Randomized RIVAL Trial

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Sanjit S. Jolly ; MD ; MSc^? ; ^{sanjit.jolly@phri.ca} ; John Cairns ; MD^&dagger ; ; Kari Niemela ; MD ; PhD^&Dagger ; ; Philippe Gabriel Steg ; MD^§ ; ; Madhu K. Natarajan ; MD ; MSc^? ; Asim N. Cheema ; MD ; PhD^¡Î ; Sunil V. Rao ; MD^¶ ; ; Warren J. Cantor ; MD^# ; Vladimí ; r D?aví ; k ; MD^?? ; Andrzej Budaj ; MD ; PhD^&dagger ; &dagger ; ; Tej Sheth ; MD^? ; Vicent Valentin ; MD^&Dagger ; &Dagger ; ; Anthony Fung ; MBBS^&dagger ; ; Petr Widimsky ; MD^§ ; § ; ; Emile Ferrari ; MD^¡Î¡Î ; Peggy Gao ; MSc^? ; Barbara Jedrzejowski ; MEng^? ; Shamir R. Mehta ; MD ; MSc^? ; RIVAL Investigators
• 关键词：femoral access ; percutaneous coronary intervention ; radial access ; radiation dose
• 刊名：JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：March, 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：6
• 期：3
• 页码：258-266
• 全文大小：445 K

文摘

| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Objectives

The authors sought to compare the radiation dose between radial and femoral access.

Background

Small trials have shown an increase in the radiation dose with radial compared with femoral access, but many were performed during the operators' learning curve of radial access.

Methods

Patients were randomized to radial or femoral access, as a part of the RIVAL (RadIal Vs. femorAL) trial (N = 7,021). Fluoroscopy time was prospectively collected in 5740 patients and radiation dose quantified as air kerma in 1,445 patients and dose-area product (DAP) in 2,255 patients.

Results

Median fluoroscopy time was higher with radial versus femoral access (9.3 vs. 8.0 min, p < 0.001). Median air kerma was nominally higher with radial versus femoral access (1,046 vs. 930 mGy, respectively, p = 0.051). Median DAP was not different between radial and femoral access (52.8 Gy-cm² vs. 51.2 Gy¡¤cm², p = 0.83). When results are stratified according to procedural volume, air kerma was increased only in the lowest tertile of radial volume centers (low 1,425 vs. 1,045 mGy, p = 0.002; middle 987 vs. 958 mGy, p = 0.597; high 652 vs. 621 mGy, p = 0.403, interaction p = 0.026). Multivariable regression showed procedural volume was the greatest independent predictor of lower air kerma dose (ratio of geometric means 0.55; 95 % confidence interval 0.49 to 0.61 for highest-volume radial centers).

Conclusions

Radiation dose as measured by air kerma was nominally higher with radial versus femoral access, but differences were present only in lower-volume centers and operators. High-volume centers have the lowest radiation dose irrespective of which access site approach that they use. (A Trial of Trans-radial Versus Trans-femoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Access Site Approach in Patients With Unstable Angina or Myocardial Infarction Managed With an Invasive Strategy [RIVAL]; )