Cross-sectional, descriptive study.
Twenty-seven people with PFP and 29 pain-free people participated. Participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging at 0¡ã, 20¡ã, and 40¡ã knee flexion with the limb in a simulated weight-bearing position. Patellofemoral contact area, tibiofemoral rotation angle, patellofemoral alignment (bisect offset index and patellar tilt angle) were quantified and compared between groups at each angle using Student's t-tests. An a-posteriori comparison was made between the pain-free group and a subgroup of 15 participants with patellofemoral pain who demonstrated a faulty lower limb movement pattern (¡°medial collapse¡±).
In the patellofemoral pain group, contact area was lower at 0¡ã (203.8 ¡À 45.5 mm2 vs. 224.1 ¡À 46.6 mm2, p = 0.05) and 20¡ã (276.8 ¡À 56.2 mm2 vs. 316.7 ¡À 82.8 mm2, p = 0.02), bisect offset index (BOS) and patellar tilt angle (PTA) were higher at 0¡ã (bisect offset index: 0.69 ¡À 0.13 vs. 0.64 ¡À 0.09, p = 0.04; patellar tilt angle: 12.5 ¡À 7.6¡ã vs. 9.2 ¡À 5.8¡ã, p = 0.04). In the patellofemoral pain subgroup, tibiofemoral rotation was higher at 0¡ã compared to pain-free participants (6.4 ¡À 5.9¡ã vs. 4.0 ¡À 4.6¡ã, p = 0.07).
While contact area and patellofemoral alignment were altered in people with patellofemoral pain, tibiofemoral rotation was altered in a subgroup of people who demonstrated medial collapse. Subgroup classification may help identify mechanisms of pain and assist in developing targeted interventions.