Dialysis Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Cluster-Randomized Trial of the ClearGuard HD Antimicrobial Barrier Cap

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jeffrey L. Hymes ; MD¹ ; Ann Mooney ; MSN ; RN ; CNN² ; Carly Van Zandt ; MS² ; Laurie Lynch ; PhD³ ; Robert Ziebol ; BS³ ; Douglas Killion ; MBA³ ; ^{dkillion@pursuitvascular.com}
• 关键词：Hemodialysis ; central venous catheter (CVC) ; chlorhexidine acetate ; bloodstream infection (BSI) ; positive blood culture ; infection prevention ; end-stage renal disease (ESRD) ; ClearGuard HD antimicrobial barrier cap ; antimicrobial lock ; catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) ; central line&ndash ; associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) ; cluster-randomized trial
• 刊名：American Journal of Kidney Diseases
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：February 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：69
• 期：2
• 页码：220-227
• 全文大小：413 K
• 卷排序：69

文摘

The rate of bloodstream infections (BSIs) is disproportionately high in hemodialysis (HD) patients with central venous catheters (CVCs) versus those with permanent accesses, contributing to poorer outcomes, such as increased rates of death and hospitalizations.Study Design12-month, prospective, cluster-randomized, multicenter, open-label trial.Setting & Participants40 Fresenius Medical Care North America dialysis facilities were matched and paired by positive blood culture rate and number of patients with CVCs and then cluster-randomized with 20 in each study group. 2,470 patients participated in the study (1,245, intervention group; 1,225, control group), accruing approximately 350,000 CVC-days.InterventionUse of ClearGuard HD Antimicrobial Barrier Caps versus use of standard CVC caps; assigned at the facility level.OutcomePrimary end point was positive blood culture rate as an indicator of BSI rate.MeasurementsPositive blood cultures, hospital admissions for BSI, hospitalization-days for BSI, intravenous antibiotic starts, and CVC-days.ResultsBaseline positive blood culture rates were similar (P = 0.8) between groups. Use of ClearGuard HD caps for 12 months was associated with a 56% lower BSI rate versus use of standard CVC caps (0.26 vs 0.59/1,000 CVC-days, respectively; P = 0.01). When considering sustained use (defined as last 6 months of the study), the intervention versus the control was associated with a 69% lower BSI rate (0.22 vs 0.72/1,000 CVC-days, respectively; P = 0.01), 43% fewer hospital admissions for BSI (0.28 vs 0.48/1,000 CVC-days, respectively; P = 0.04), and 51% fewer hospitalization days for BSI (2.42 vs 4.94/1,000 CVC-days, respectively; P = 0.04). No device-related adverse events were reported.LimitationsStudy was open label; patients occasionally received HD at nonresearch facilities; patients did not receive the intervention when hospitalized.ConclusionsThe findings show that use of ClearGuard HD Antimicrobial Barrier Caps, when compared with standard CVC caps, significantly lowers rates of catheter-related BSIs and hospital admissions for BSI in HD patients using CVCs.