Comparison of Inhaled Antibiotics for the Treatment of Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lung Infection in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis: Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：J. Stuart Elborn ; MD ; FRCP¹ ; Anne-Lise Vataire ; PhD² ; Ayako Fukushima ; MSc² ; Samuel Aballea ; PhD² ; Amine Khemiri ; MSc² ; Curtis Moore ; BA³ ; Goran Medic ; MSc ; Pharm⁴ ; ⁵ ; Michiel E.H. Hemels ; MSc ; MBA⁴ ; ^{mhemels@raptorpharma.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}
• 关键词：cystic fibrosis ; levofloxacin inhalation solution ; network meta-analysis
• 刊名：Clinical Therapeutics
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：October 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：38
• 期：10
• 页码：2204-2226
• 全文大小：602 K

文摘

In Europe, 4 inhaled antibiotics (tobramycin, colistimethate sodium, aztreonam, and levofloxacin) are currently approved for the treatment of chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Levofloxacin inhalation solution (LIS) is the most recently approved inhaled antibiotic for adult patients with CF. A systematic literature review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the relative short-term (4 weeks) and long-term (24 weeks) outcomes of these inhaled antibiotics versus LIS.

Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted on February 16, 2016, using EMBASE and Medline via OvidSP. All randomized controlled trials comparing any of the aforementioned inhaled antibiotics with 4 or 24 weeks of follow-up were evaluated. NMA was performed for the following outcomes: relative and absolute percent changes from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁%) predicted, change in P aeruginosa sputum density, respiratory symptoms score from the CF questionnaire–revised, hospitalization, additional antibiotics use, and study withdrawal rates.

Results

Of the 685 articles identified, 7 unique studies were included in the 4 weeks’ NMA and 9 unique studies were included in the 24 weeks’ NMA. Aztreonam was predicted to result in the greatest numerically increase in FEV₁% predicted at 4 weeks, whereas LIS were predicted to be numerically greater than colistimethate sodium, tobramycin inhaled solution (TIS), and tobramycin inhaled powder (TIP). However, all of the 95% credibility intervals (CrIs) of these comparisons included zero. At 24 weeks, none of the treatments was significantly more effective than LIS. The estimates for the mean change from baseline to 24 weeks in relative FEV₁% versus LIS was –0.55 (95% CrI, –3.91 to 2.80) for TIS, –2.36 (95% CrI, –7.32 to 2.63) for aztreonam, –2.95 (95% CrI, –10.44 to 4.51) for TIP, and –9.66 (95% CrI, –15.01 to –4.33) for placebo. Compared with LIS, the odds ratio for hospitalization at 24 weeks was 1.92 (95% CrI, 1.01–3.30) for TIS, 2.25 (95% CrI, 1.01–4.34) for TIP, and 3.16 (95% CrI, 1.53–5.78) for placebo, all statistically worse than LIS. P aeruginosa sputum density scores, additional use of antipseudomonal antibiotics, and study withdrawal rates were comparable among all inhaled antibiotics at all times.

Implications

Based on this NMA, the analyses for many of the outcomes did not provide significant evidence to indicate that the other approved inhaled antibiotics were more effective than LIS for the treatment of chronic P aeruginosa lung infection in patients with CF. Study withdrawal rates seemed to be comparable among these inhaled antibiotics.