Orthotopic neobladder vs. ileal conduit urinary diversion: A long-term quality-of-life comparison
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Hanan Goldberg ; M.D.a ; b ; Gohanan@gmail.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Jack Baniel ; M.D.a ; b ; Roy Mano ; M.D.a ; b ; Guy Rotlevy ; M.D.a ; b ; Daniel Kedar ; M.D.a ; b ; Ofer Yossepowitch ; M.D.a ; b
- 关键词：Quality of life ; Urinary diversion ; Bladder Cancer Index
- 刊名：Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：March 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：34
- 期：3
- 页码：121.e1-121.e7
- 全文大小：661 K
文摘
- •
It is unclear which urinary diversion has the least detrimental impact on quality of life.
- •
A clear selection bias exists regarding which patients receive which urinary diversion.
- •
Urinary function is worse in neobladder patients compared to ileal conduit patients.
- •
Sexual function is better in neobladder patients but causes much more bother.
- •
In retrospect, none of the patients regret their choice of urinary diversion.