Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Leilei Xia1 ; xll7188@126.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Xiaohua Zhang1 ; 476055987@qq.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Xianjin Wang xianjin09@163.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Tianyuan Xu xvtianyuan@126.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Liang Qin 519345829@qq.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Xiang Zhang 15556186590@163.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Shan Zhong 5068054033@sjtu.edu.cn" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Zhoujun Shen ; shenzj68@sina.cn" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author
- 关键词：Robot ; Partial nephrectomy ; Nephron sparing surgery ; Transperitoneal ; Retroperitoneal
- 刊名：International Journal of Surgery
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：June 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：30
- 期：Complete
- 页码：109-115
- 全文大小：1107 K
文摘
- •
Robotic partial nephrectomy can be performed through transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach.
- •
Transperitoneal approach has similar complications, conversions, warm ischemia time, blood loss, and surgical margins compared with retroperitoneal approach.
- •
Retroperitoneal approach has marginally shorter operative time compared with transperitoneal approach.