Access to Care for Patients With Time-Sensitive Conditions in聽Pennsylvania

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Rama A. Salhi ; MHS^a ; J. Matthew Edwards ; MD^b ; David F. Gaieski ; MD^b ; Roger A. Band ; MD^b ; Benjamin S. Abella ; MD ; MPhil^b ; Brendan G. Carr ; MD ; MS^a ; ^b ; ^c ; ^d ; ^{carrb@upenn.edu" class="auth_mail}
• 刊名：Annals of Emergency Medicine
• 出版年：May, 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：63
• 期：5
• 页码：572-579
• 全文大小：180 K

文摘

| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Study objective

Collective knowledge and coordination of vital interventions for time-sensitive conditions (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], stroke, cardiac arrest, and septic shock) could contribute to a comprehensive statewide emergency care system, but little is known about population access to the resources required. We seek to describe existing clinical management strategies for time-sensitive conditions in Pennsylvania hospitals.

Methods

All Pennsylvania emergency departments (EDs) open in 2009 were surveyed about resource availability and practice patterns for time-sensitive conditions. The frequency with which EDs provided essential clinical bundles for each condition was assessed. Penalized maximum likelihood regressions were used to evaluate associations between ED characteristics and the presence of the 4 clinical bundles of care. We used geographic information science to calculate 60-minute ambulance access to the nearest facility with these clinical bundles.

Results

The percentage of EDs providing each of the 4 clinical bundles in 2009 ranged from 20% to 57% (stroke 20%, STEMI 32%, cardiac arrest 34%, sepsis 57%). For STEMI and stroke, presence of a board-certified/board-eligible emergency physician was significantly associated with presence of a clinical bundle. Only 8% of hospitals provided all 4 care bundles. However, 53% of the population was able to reach this minority of hospitals within 60 minutes.

Conclusion

Reliably matching patient needs to ED resources in time-dependent illness is a critical component of a coordinated emergency care system. Population access to critical interventions for the time-dependent diseases discussed here is limited. A population-based planning approach and improved coordination of care could improve access to interventions for patients with time-sensitive conditions.