- 作者：Jin Hyoung Park ; MDAuthor Vitae ; Myoung Joon Kim ; MD ; PhD ; mjmjkim@gmail.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author ; Jong Hoon Park ; MD ; In Seok Song ; MD ; Jae Yong Kim ; MD ; PhD ; Hungwon Tchah ; MD ; PhD
- 刊名：Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- 出版年：2015
- 出版时间：September 2015
- 年：2015
- 卷：41
- 期：9
- 页码：1889-1897
- 全文大小：901 K
Setting
Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Design
Retrospective nonrandomized clinical study.
Methods
Refractive errors were evaluated after more than 1 month postoperatively. Subjective refractive error measurements were obtained by the same practitioner. Refractive error measurements were obtained with the Hartmann-Shack sensor refractor and a conventional refractor (KR 8800).
Results
There were 121 eyes (121 patients) with previous corneal refractive surgery and 122 eyes (122 patients) with previous cataract surgery. The results of refractive error measured by the Hartmann-Shack sensor refractor were more similar to subjective refraction than those measured by the conventional refractor in both groups. In both groups, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) for the subjective refraction showed better agreement with the automated refraction measured by the Hartmann-Shack sensor refractor (limits of agreement [LoA], −0.66 to +0.65 diopters [D] and −0.47 to +0.41 D, respectively) than the automated refraction measured by the conventional refractor (LoA, −1.66 to +0.58 D and −1.34 to +0.60 D, respectively). In both groups, the Jackson cross-cylinder at axis 0 degrees and 45 degrees from the automated refraction by the Hartmann-Shack sensor refractor and conventional refractor showed similar agreement with the subjective refraction.
Conclusion
The Hartmann-Shack sensor automated refractor gave reliable and valid objective refraction results in patients who have had cataract or corneal refractive surgery.
Financial Disclosure
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.