Comparison of single-incision mini-slings (Ajust) and standard transobturator midurethral slings (Align) in the management of female stress urinary incontinence: A 1-year follow-up

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Chia-Pei Chang^a ; ^b ; ¹ ; Wen-Hsun Chang^a ; ^c ; ^d ; Yen-Mei Hsu^a ; ^c ; Yi-Jen Chen^a ; ^b ; Kuo-Chang Wen^a ; ^b ; Kuan-Chong Chao^a ; ^b ; Ming-Shyen Yen^a ; ^b ; Huann-Cheng Horng^a ; ^b ; ^{hchorng@vghtpe.gov.tw" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Peng-Hui Wang^a ; ^b ; ^d ; ^e ; ^f ; ¹ ; Task Force on Gyn-Urodynamic Research Group^aChi-Mu Chuang ; Yen-Hou Chang ; Hua-Hsi Wu ; Hei-Yu Lau ; Jen-Yu Tseng ; Hsiao-Wen Tsai ; Nae-Fong Twu ; Hsiang-Tai Chao
• 关键词：single-incision mini-slings ; standard transobturator midurethral slings ; urinary incontinence
• 刊名：Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：December 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：54
• 期：6
• 页码：726-730
• 全文大小：222 K

文摘

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of a new single-incision mini-sling (SIMS)—Ajust—compared with the standard transobturator midurethral sling (SMUS)—Align—for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 1, 2010 and August 31, 2012. Women with SUI who underwent either SMUS-Align or SIMS-Ajust were recruited. The primary outcomes included operation time, estimated operative blood loss, postoperative pain, and complications. The secondary outcomes included subjective and objective success, defined as an International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) score of 0 or improvement as felt by the patient and a long-term complication, such as dyspareunia and mesh erosion after 6 months and 12 months of follow-up.

Results

A total of 136 patients were enrolled, including 76 receiving SMUS-Align and 60 receiving SIMS-Ajust. Baseline characteristics of the patients in both groups were similar, without a statistically significant difference. Primary outcomes between both groups were similar, except that women treated with SIMS-Ajust had statistically significantly shorter operation time (p = 0.003), less intent to treat (p < 0.05), and earlier postoperative discharge (p = 0.001) than women treated with SMUS-Align. Secondary outcomes were similar without a significant difference between the two groups (93% vs. 88% success rate in each group).

Conclusion

Our results showed that SIMS-Ajust was not inferior to SMUS-Align with respect to success rate, and might have a slight advantage in early discharge. A long-term follow-up or prospective study is needed to confirm the above findings.