文摘
The ability to coherently assess content knowledge throughout an entire undergraduate career represents a significant advantage for programmatic assessment strategies. Chemistry, as a discipline, has an unusual tool in this regard because of the nationally standardized exams from the ACS Exams Institute. These exams are norm-referenced and allow chemistry departments to make comparisons between the performance of their own students relative to national samples; however, currently there appears to be no systematic means for noting students鈥?content knowledge growth over a four-year degree. The Exams Institute is undertaking the task of organizing content along an anchoring concept or 鈥渂ig ideas鈥?framework to facilitate this type of analysis.
Keywords:
First-Year Undergraduate/General; Second-Year Undergraduate; Upper-Division Undergraduate; Interdisciplinary/Multidisciplinary; Testing/Assessment