"Formal" and standard Ru(II)-catalyzed [2 + 2 + 2] cycloaddition of 1,6-diynes
1 to alkenes gave bicyclic1,3-cyclohexadienes in relatively good yields. The neutral Ru(II) catalyst was formed in situ by mixingequimolecular amounts of [Cp*Ru(CH
3CN)
3]PF
6 and Et
4NCl. Two isomeric bicyclic 1,3-cyclohexadienes
3 and
8 were obtained depending on the cyclic or acyclic nature of the alkene partner. Mechanisticstudies on the Ru catalytic cycle revealed a clue for this difference: (a) when acyclic alkenes were used,linear coupling of 1,6-diynes with alkenes was observed giving 1,3,5-trienes
6 as the only initial reactionproducts, which after a thermal disrotatory 6e
- electrocyclization led to the final 1,3-cyclohexadienes
3 as probed by NMR studies. This cascade process behaved as a formal Ru-catalyzed [2 + 2 + 2]cycloaddition. (b) With cyclic alkenes, the standard Ru-catalyzed [2 + 2 + 2] cycloaddition occurred,giving the bicyclic 1,3-cyclohexadienes
8 as reaction products. A complete catalytic cycle for the formaland standard Ru-catalyzed [2 + 2 + 2] cycloaddition of acetylene and cyclic and acyclic alkenes withthe Cp*RuCl fragment has been proposed and discussed based on DFT/B3LYP calculations. The mostlikely mechanism for these processes would involve the formation of ruthenacycloheptadiene intermediates
XXIII or
XXVII depending on the alkene nature. From these complexes, two alternatives could beenvisioned: (a) a reductive elimination in the case of cyclic alkenes
7 and (b) a
-elimination followedby reductive elimination to give 1,3,5-hexatrienes
6 in the case of acyclic alkenes. Final 6e
-electrocyclization of
6 gave 1,3-cyclohexadienes
3.