Flagging False Positives Following Untargeted LC–MS Characterization of Histone Post-Translational Modification Combinations

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Sander WillemsMaarten Dhaenens ; Elisabeth Govaert ; Laura De Clerck ; Paulien Meert ; Christophe Van Neste ; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh ; Dieter Deforce
• 刊名：Journal of Proteome Research
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：February 3, 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：16
• 期：2
• 页码：655-664
• 全文大小：464K
• ISSN：1535-3907

文摘

Epigenetic changes can be studied with an untargeted characterization of histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS). While prior information about more than 20 types of histone PTMs exists, little is known about histone PTM combinations (PTMCs). Because of the combinatorial explosion it is intrinsically impossible to consider all potential PTMCs in a database search. Consequentially, high-scoring false positives with unconsidered but correct alternative isobaric PTMCs can occur. Current quality controls can neither estimate the amount of unconsidered alternatives nor flag potential false positives. Here, we propose a conceptual workflow that provides such options. In this workflow, an in silico modeling of all candidate isoforms with known-to-exist PTMs is made. The most frequently occurring PTM sets of these candidate isoforms are determined and used in several database searches. This suppresses the combinatorial explosion while considering as many candidate isoforms as possible. Finally, annotations can be classified as unique or ambiguous, the latter implying false positives. This workflow was evaluated on an LC–MS data set containing 44 histone extracts. We were able to consider 60% of all candidate isoforms. Importantly, 40% of all annotations were classified as ambiguous. This highlights the need for a more thorough evaluation of modified peptide annotations.