Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis alters stomatal conductance of host plants more under drought than under amply watered conditions: a meta-analysis

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Robert M. Augé ; Heather D. Toler ; Arnold M. Saxton
• 关键词：Arbuscular mycorrhiza ; Drought ; Moderators ; Meta ; analysis ; Phosphorus limitation ; Root colonization ; Stomatal conductance ; Water relations
• 刊名：Mycorrhiza
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：January 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：25
• 期：1
• 页码：13-24
• 全文大小：1,021 KB
• 参考文献：1. Adams DC, Gurevitch J, Rosenberg MS (1997) Resampling tests for meta-analysis of ecological data. Ecology 75:1277-283 CrossRef
  2. Allen EB, Allen MF (1986) Water relations of xeric grasses in the field: interactions of mycorrhizas and competition. New Phytol 104:559-71 CrossRef
  3. Augé RM (1989) Do VA mycorrhizae enhance transpiration by affecting host phosphorus content? J Plant Nutr 12:743-53 CrossRef
  4. Augé RM (2000) Stomatal behavior of arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. In: Kapulnik Y, Douds DD (eds) Arbuscular mycorrhizas: physiology and function. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 201-37 CrossRef
  5. Augé RM (2001) Water relations, drought and VA mycorrhizal symbiosis. Mycorrhiza 11:3-2 CrossRef
  6. Augé RM, Stodola AJ, Brown MS, Bethlenfalvay GJ (1992) Stomatal response of mycorrhizal cowpea and soybean to short-term osmotic stress. New Phytol 120:117-25 CrossRef
  7. Augé RM, Moore JL, Sylvia DM, Cho K (2004) Mycorrhizal promotion of host stomatal conductance in relation to irradiance and temperature. Mycorrhiza 14:85-2 CrossRef
  8. Augé RM, Toler HD, Moore JL, Cho K, Saxton AM (2007) Comparing contributions of soil versus root colonization to variations in stomatal behavior and soil drying in mycorrhizal / Sorghum bicolor and / Cucurbita pepo. J Plant Physiol 164:1289-299 CrossRef
  9. Begg CB, Mazumdar MM (1994) Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 50:1088-101 CrossRef
  10. Benabdellah K, Abbas Y, Abourouh M, Aroca R, Azcon R (2011) Influence of two bacterial isolates from degraded and non-degraded soils and arbuscular mycorrhizae fungi isolated from semi-arid zone on the growth of Trifolium repens under drought conditions: Mechanisms related to bacterial effectiveness. Eur J Soil Biol 47:303-09 CrossRef
  11. Bethlenfalvay GJ, Thomas RS, Dakessian S, Brown MS, Ames RN, Whitehead EE (1988) Mycorrhizae in stressed environments: effects on plant growth, endophyte development, soil stability and soil water. In: Hutchinson CF, Timmermann BN (eds) Arid lands: today and tomorrow. Westview, Boulder, pp 1015-029
  12. Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein J (2009) Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley, West Sussex CrossRef
  13. Cooper H (2010) Research synthesis and meta-analysis: a step-by-step approach, 4th edn. SAGE Publications Inc, London
  14. Cowan IR (1977) Stomatal behavior and environment. Adv Bot Res 4:117-28 CrossRef
  15. Dakessian S, Brown MS, Bethlenfalvay GJ (1986) Relationship of mycorrhizal growth enhancement and plant growth with soil water and texture. Plant Soil 94:439-44 CrossRef
  16. Ebel RC, Welbaum GE, Gunatilaka M, Nelson T, Augé RM (1996) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and nonhydraulic signaling of soil drying in / Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Mycorrhiza 6:119-27 CrossRef
  17. Fitter AH, Hay RKM (1987) Environmental physiology of plants. Academic, New York
  18. Fitter AH, Merryweather RW (1992) Why are some plants more mycorrhizal than others? An ecological inquiry. In: Read DJ, Lewis DH, Fitter AH, Alexander I (eds) Mycorrhizas in ecosystems. CAB International, Wallingord, UK, pp 26-6
  19. Franson RL, Milford SB, Bethlenfalvay GJ (199
• 作者单位：Robert M. Augé (1)
  Heather D. Toler (1)
  Arnold M. Saxton (2)
  
  1. Department of Plant Sciences, University of Tennessee, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, Knoxville, TN, 37996-4561, USA
  2. Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, 2505 River Drive, Knoxville, TN, 37996-4574, USA
  
• 刊物类别：Biomedical and Life Sciences
• 刊物主题：Life Sciences
  Microbiology
  Plant Sciences
  Ecology
  Agriculture
  Forestry
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1432-1890

文摘

Stomata regulate rates of carbon assimilation and water loss. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) symbioses often modify stomatal behavior and therefore play pivotal roles in plant productivity. The size of the AM effect on stomatal conductance to water vapor (g s ) has varied widely, has not always been apparent, and is unpredictable. We conducted a meta-analysis of 460 studies to determine the size of the AM effect under ample watering and drought and to examine how experimental conditions have influenced the AM effect. Across all host and symbiont combinations under all soil moisture conditions, AM plants have shown 24?% higher g s than nonmycorrhizal (NM) controls. The promotion of g s has been over twice as great during moderate drought than under amply watered conditions. The AM influence on g s has been even more pronounced under severe drought, with over four times the promotion observed with ample water. Members of the Claroideoglomeraceae, Glomeraceae, and other AM families stimulated g s by about the same average amount. Colonization by native AM fungi has produced the largest promotion. Among single-AM symbionts, Glomus deserticola, Claroideoglomus etunicatum, and Funneliformis mosseae have had the largest average effects on g s across studies. Dicotyledonous hosts, especially legumes, have been slightly more responsive to AM symbiosis than monocotyledonous hosts, and C3 plants have shown over twice the AM-induced promotion of C4 plants. The extent of root colonization is important, with heavily colonized plants showing ×10 the g s promotion of lightly colonized plants. AM promotion of g s has been larger in growth chambers and in the field than in greenhouse studies, almost ×3 as large when plants were grown under high light than low light, and ×2.5 as large in purely mineral soils than in soils having an organic component. When AM plants have been compared with NM controls given NM pot culture, they have shown only half the promotion of g s as NM plants not given anything at inoculation to control for associated soil organisms. The AM effect has been much greater when AM plants were larger or had more phosphorus than NM controls. These findings should assist in further investigations of predictions and mechanisms of the AM influence on host g s .