Targets and self-management for the control of blood pressure in stroke and at risk groups (TASMIN-SR): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Claire O’Brien (1)
  Emma P Bray (1)
  Stirling Bryan (2)
  Sheila M Greenfield (1)
  M Sayeed Haque (1)
  FD Richard Hobbs (3)
  Miren I Jones (1)
  Sue Jowett (4)
  Billingsley Kaambwa (4)
  Paul Little (5)
  Jonathan Mant (6)
  Cristina Penaloza (4)
  Claire Schwartz (1)
  Helen Shackleford (1)
  Jinu Varghese (1)
  Bryan Williams (7)
  Richard J McManus (3)
  
• 关键词：Hypertension ; Self ; management ; Stroke ; Diabetes ; Coronary heart disease ; Chronic kidney disease ; Primary care
• 刊名：BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：December 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：13
• 期：1
• 全文大小：197KB
• 参考文献：1. Perkovic V, Ninomiya T, Arima H, Gallagher M, Jardine M, Cass A, Neal B, MacMahon S, Chalmers J: Chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular events, and the effects of perindopril-based blood pressure lowering: data from the PROGRESS study. / J Am Soc Nephrol 2007, 18:2766-772. CrossRef
  2. Ratnasabapathy Y, Lawes CM, Anderson CS: The Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study (PROGRESS): Clinical Implications for Older Patients with Cerebrovascular Disease. / Drugs Aging 2003, 20:241-51. CrossRef
  3. Law MR, Morris JK, Wald NJ: Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of 147 randomised trials in the context of expectations from prospective epidemiological studies. / BMJ 2009, 338:b1665. CrossRef
  4. Mann JF, Gerstein HC, Pogue J, Bosch J, Yusuf S: Renal insufficiency as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes and the impact of ramipril: the HOPE randomized trial. / Ann Intern Med 2001, 134:629-36. CrossRef
  5. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party: / National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke. 2004. [ / Royal College of Physicians]
  6. Williams B, Poulter NR, Brown MJ, Davis M, McInnes GT, Potter JF, Sever PS, McG TS: Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the fourth working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004-BHS IV. / J Hum Hypertens 2004, 18:139-85. CrossRef
  7. Primatesta P, Poulter NR: Lipid concentrations and the use of lipid lowering drugs: evidence from a national cross sectional survey. / BMJ 2000, 321:1322-325. CrossRef
  8. McManus RJ, Mant J, Bray EP, Holder R, Jones MI, Greenfield S, Kaambwa B, Banting M, Bryan S, Little P, Williams B, Hobbs FD: Telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension (TASMINH2): a randomised controlled trial. / Lancet 2010, 376:163-72. CrossRef
  9. McManus RJ, Bray EP, Mant J, Holder R, Greenfield S, Bryan S, Jones MI, Little P, Williams B, Hobbs FD: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension: telemonitoring and self-management in hypertension. / BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2009, 9:6. [ISRCTN17585681] CrossRef
  10. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K: Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. / JAMA 2002, 288:2469-475. CrossRef
  11. Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, Turner A, Hainsworth J: Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: a review. / Patient Educ Couns 2002, 48:177-87. CrossRef
  12. Joint British Societies: JBS 2: Joint British Societies' guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice. / Heart 2005,91(Suppl 5):v1-v52.
  13. Cappuccio FP, Kerry SM, Forbes L, Donald A: Blood pressure control by home monitoring: meta-analysis of randomised trials. / BMJ 2004, 329:145-51. CrossRef
  14. Mattu GS, Heran BS, Wright JM: Overall accuracy of the BpTRU–an automated electronic blood pressure device. / Blood Press Monit 2004, 9:47-2. CrossRef
  15. Katzman R, Brown T, Fuld P, Peck A, Schechter R, Schimmel H: Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment. / Am J Psychiatry 1983, 140:734-39.
  16. Felson DT, Nevitt MC: Epidemiologic studies for osteoarthritis: new versus conventional study design approaches. / Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America 2004, 30:783-97. CrossRef
  17. Moss-Morris R, Weinman J, Petrie K, Horne R, Cameron L, Buick D: The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). / Psychol Health 2002, 17:1-6. CrossRef
  18. Battersby W, Ask A, Reece M, Markwick J, Collins P: The Partners in Health scale: The development and psychometric properties of a generic assessment scale for chronic condition self-management. / Aust J Prim Health 2003, 9:41-2. CrossRef
  19. Marteau TM, Bekker H: The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). / Br J Clin Psychol 1992,31(Pt 3):301-06. CrossRef
  20. Dolan P: Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States. / Medical Care 1997,35(11):1095. CrossRef
  21. Greenfield S, Pattison H, Jolly K: Use of complementary and alternative medicine and self-tests by coronary heart disease patients. / BMC Complement Altern Med 2008, 8:47. CrossRef
  22. Siahpush M: Postmodern values, dissatisfaction with conventional medicine and popularity of alternative therapies. / J Sociol 1998, 34:58-0. CrossRef
  23. Godwin M, Streight S, Dyachuk E, van den Hooven EC, Ploemacher J, Seguin R, Cuthbertson S: Testing the Simple Lifestyle Indicator Questionnaire. / Canadian Family Physician 2008, 54:76-7.
  24. Toft U, Kristoffersen LH, Lau C, Borch-Johnsen K, Jorgensen T: The Dietary Quality Score: validation and association with cardiovascular risk factors: the Inter99 study. / Eur J Clin Nutr 2006, 61:270-78. CrossRef
  25. Bijl J, Poelgeest-Eeltink A, Shortridge-Baggett L: The psychometric properties of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. / J Adv Nurs 1999,30(2):352-59. CrossRef
  26. Curtis L: / Unit Costs of Health and Social Care. 2011. University of Kent. [http://www.pssru.ac.uk/project-pages/unit-costs/2011/index.php] accessed 14/1/2013
  27. O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ: "Any other comments?" Open questions on questionnaires - a bane or a bonus to research? / BMC Med Res Methodol 2004, 4:25. CrossRef
  28. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/13/21/prepub
  
• 作者单位：Claire O’Brien (1)
  Emma P Bray (1)
  Stirling Bryan (2)
  Sheila M Greenfield (1)
  M Sayeed Haque (1)
  FD Richard Hobbs (3)
  Miren I Jones (1)
  Sue Jowett (4)
  Billingsley Kaambwa (4)
  Paul Little (5)
  Jonathan Mant (6)
  Cristina Penaloza (4)
  Claire Schwartz (1)
  Helen Shackleford (1)
  Jinu Varghese (1)
  Bryan Williams (7)
  Richard J McManus (3)
  
  1. Primary Care Clinical Sciences, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
  2. Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  3. Primary Care Health Sciences, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
  4. Health Economics Unit, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
  5. School of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
  6. Primary Care Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB1 8RN, UK
  7. Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University College London, 170 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7HA, UK
  

文摘

Background Self-monitoring of hypertension with self-titration of antihypertensives (self-management) results in lower systolic blood pressure for at least one year. However, few people in high risk groups have been evaluated to date and previous work suggests a smaller effect size in these groups. This trial therefore aims to assess the added value of self-management in high risk groups over and above usual care. Methods/Design The targets and self-management for the control of blood pressure in stroke and at risk groups (TASMIN-SR) trial will be a pragmatic primary care based, unblinded, randomised controlled trial of self-management of blood pressure (BP) compared to usual care. Eligible patients will have a history of stroke, coronary heart disease, diabetes or chronic kidney disease and will be recruited from primary care. Participants will be individually randomised to either usual care or self-management. The primary outcome of the trial will be difference in office SBP between intervention and control groups at 12 months adjusted for baseline SBP and covariates. 540 patients will be sufficient to detect a difference in SBP between self-management and usual care of 5 mmHg with 90% power. Secondary outcomes will include self-efficacy, lifestyle behaviours, health-related quality of life and adverse events. An economic analysis will consider both within trial costs and a model extrapolating the results thereafter. A qualitative analysis will gain insights into patients-views, experiences and decision making processes. Discussion The results of the trial will be directly applicable to primary care in the UK. If successful, self-management of blood pressure in people with stroke and other high risk conditions would be applicable to many hundreds of thousands of individuals in the UK and beyond. Trial Registration ISRCTN87171227