鈥淐han Contemplation鈥?in the Tangut Buddhism

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：K. Solonin
• 关键词：Tangut Buddhism ; Liao Buddhism ; Chan ; Tibetan Buddhism ; Perfect teaching
• 刊名：Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：June 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：7
• 期：2
• 页码：203-245
• 全文大小：
• 参考文献：Broughton, J. 2009. Zongmi on Chan. New York: Columbia University Press.
  Chen Qingying 闄虫叾鑻? 2003 鈥?em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Da cheng yao dao mi ji yu xi xia wang chao de zang chuan fo jiao鈥?銆婂ぇ涔樿閬撳瘑闆嗐€嬭垏瑗垮鐜嬫湞鐨勮棌鍌充經鏁? Zhong guo zang xue 涓湅钘忓 3.
  Chen Wei 闄崇憢. 2012. 鈥淕ongyuan 10-11shiji Ling-Xia dangxiang ji Xixia yu Y眉tian guanxi shi yanjiu鈥?鍏厓10鈥?1涓栫磤闈堝鍏氶爡鍙婅タ澶忚垏浜庨棎闂滀總鍙茬爺绌? In Du Jianlu 鏉滃缓閷?ed. Xixia xue lunji 瑗垮瀛歌珫闆? 100鈥?05. Shanghai: Shanghai guiji.
  Chen Yanzhu 闄崇嚂鐝? 1993. Fangzhan shijingzhong Tongli dashi kejing zhi yanjiu 鎴垮北鐭崇稉涓€氱悊澶у斧鍒荤稉涔嬬爺绌? Taibei: Huiyuan wenjiao jijinhui 1993.
  Chen Yongge 闄虫案闈? 2012. 鈥?em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Lun Liaodai Huayan de Chanjiao rongtong sixiang鈥?璜栭伡浠ｈ彲鍤寸殑绂暀铻嶉€氭€濇兂. Huayan xuebao 鑿毚瀛稿牨 4.
  Davidson, R. 2008. The Tibetan renaissance: Tantric buddhism in the rebirth of Tibetan culture. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
  Dunnell, R. 1995. The great state of white and high: Buddhism and the state formation in 11th century Xia. Honolulu: University of Hawai鈥檌 Press.
  Dunnell, R. 2009. Translating history from tangut Buddhist texts. Asia Major 22 (1): 41鈥?8.
  Endo Junichiro 閬犺棨绱斾竴閮?2008. Kakuon su Dainichiky艒 gishaku emmi sho ni okeru Kegon to mikkyo no kankeise ni tsuite鈥?瑕氳嫅鎾般€婂ぇ鏃ョ稉缇╅噵婕斿瘑閳斻€嬨伀鏂笺亼銈嬭彲鍘炽仺瀵嗘暀銇枹淇傛€с伀銇ゃ亜銇? In Rengeji Bukkyo kenky奴 so kiyo 钃姳瀵轰經鏁欑爺绌舵墍绱€瑕?1.
  Endo Junichiro 閬犺棨绱斾竴閮?2010. 鈥淐h艒kan to Mikky艒鈥?婢勮銇ㄥ瘑鏁? In Chisan gakuh艒 鏅哄北瀛稿牨, vol. 54: 319鈥?55; vol. 55: 79鈥?03.
  Endo Junichiro 閬犺棨绱斾竴閮?2010. 鈥淜enmitsu ents奴 j艒butsu shiny艒 sh奴鈥?niokeru kenmitsukan鈥?銆婇’瀵嗗湏閫氭垚浣涘績瑕侀泦銆嬨伀鏂笺亼銈嬮’瀵嗚. Rengeji bugaku kenkyusho kiy艒 钃姳瀵轰經瀛哥爺绌舵墍绱€瑕?1.
  Editorial Board 2005. Baisi gou Xixia fangta. 鎷滃婧濊タ澶忔柟濉? Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe.
  Editorial Board 2007. Shanzui gou Xixia shiku 灞卞槾婧濊タ澶忕煶绐? vol. 1鈥?. Beijing: Wenwu chubanshe.
  袚o泄 袥o褑蟹a胁a 楔o薪薪y斜a谢 鈥楪os lotsawa 2001. 袚o谢y斜褘e A薪薪a谢褘 [The Blue Annals]. St. Petersburg: Eurasia Press.
  Huang Chunhe 榛冩槬鍜?1999. 鈥淟iao Yanjing Chanzong chuanboshi kaoshu鈥?閬肩嚂浜Κ瀹楀偝鎾彶璺¤€冭堪. Shoudu Bowuguan congkan 棣栭兘鍗氱墿椁ㄥ彚鍒? 3.
  Iwasaki Tsutomu. 1993. The Tibetan tribes of Ho-hsi and Buddhism during the northern song period. Acta Asiatica 64: 17鈥?7.
  Ky膲anov, E.I. 1999. 袣a褌a谢o谐 褌a薪谐y褌c泻懈x 斜y写写懈泄c泻懈x 锌a屑褟褌薪懈泻o胁 袠薪c褌懈褌y褌a 胁oc褌o泻o胁e写e薪懈褟 Pocc懈泄c泻o泄 A泻a写e屑懈懈 薪ay泻 [Catalog of the tangut buddhist texts from the collection of the Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences]. Kyoto: University of Kyoto press.
  Kamata Shigeo 閻敯鑼傞泟 1965. Ch奴goku Kegon shiso-shi no kenky奴. 涓湅鑿毚鎬濇兂鍙层伄鐮旂┒. Tokyo: T艒dai shuppankai.
  Kamata Shigeo 閻敯鑼傞泟. 1971. Zengen shosensh奴 tojo 绂簮璜歌┊闆嗛兘搴? Zen no goroku 9. Tokyo: Chikuma shob艒.
  Li Hui 鏉庤紳, Feng Guodong 棣湅妫? 2004. 鈥淓cang Heishui cheng wenxian Cijue chanshi quanhua ji kao鈥?淇?钘忛粦姘村煄鏂囩嵒銆婃厛瑕虹Κ甯嫺鍖栭泦銆嬭€? Dunhuang xue 鏁︾厡瀛?2.
  Li Hui 鏉庤紳, Feng Guodong 棣湅妫? 2011. 鈥?em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Ecang Heishui cheng wenxian Liao dai gaoseng Shanhai Sixiao zhuzuo kao.鈥?銆婁縿钘忛粦姘村煄鏂囩嵒銆嬮伡浠ｉ珮鍍у北娴锋€濆瓭钁椾綔鑰? In Xixia xue 8.
  Lin Ying-chin 鏋楄嫳娲?2006 Xixiay眉 yi 鈥淶henshi ming jing鈥?shiwen yanjiu 瑗垮瑾炶銆婄湡瀵﹀悕缍撱€嬮噵鏂囩爺绌? Taibei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
  L疟 Jianfu 鍛傚缓绂?2002. Tuzu shi 鍦熸棌鍙? Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue yuan chubanshe.
  L疟 Jianfu 鍛傚缓绂? 2010. Zhongguo mijiao shi 涓湅瀵嗘暀鍙? vol. 1鈥?. Taibei: Kongting shuyuan.
  Masaaki Chikusa 绔烘矙闆呯珷. 1997. 鈥淩y艒dai Kegon shu no ichi kosatsu鈥攐moni shinshutsu Kegon shu tenj膩ku no bunken gaku teki kenky奴鈥?閬间唬鑿毚瀹椼伄涓€鑰冨療鈹€涓汇伀閫插嚭鑿毚瀹楀吀绫嶃伄鏂囩嵒瀛哥殑鐮旂┒. In 艑tani daigaku kenky奴 nenpo澶ц胺澶у鐮旂┒骞村牨 49.
  Masaaki Chikusa 绔烘矙闆呯珷. 2000. S艒 Gen Bukky艒 bunkashi kenky奴 瀹嬪厓浣涙暀鏂囧寲鍙茬爺绌? Tokyo: Ky奴koshoin.
  L. N. Men鈥檚hikov 袥. H. Me薪褜褕懈泻o胁 1984. 袣a褌a谢o谐 泻懈褌a泄c泻o泄 褔ac褌懈 褎o薪写a 袩. 袣. 袣o蟹谢o胁a 懈蟹 Xapa-Xo褌o.[Catalog of the Chinese part of P. K. Kozlov鈥檚 Collection from Khara-Khoto]. Moc泻胁a: Hay泻a.
  Nie Hongyin 鑱堕椿闊? 2005. 鈥淴ixia dishi kaobian.鈥?瑗垮甯濆斧鑰冭鲸. Wenshi鏂囧彶3.
  Nie Hongyin 鑱堕椿闊? 2010鈥?011. 鈥淴ixia wen Chanyuan zhuquan jidu x疟 yizheng鈥?瑗垮鏂囥€婄Κ婧愯瑭泦閮藉簭銆嬭璀? (parts 1鈥?). Xixia xue 5鈥?.
  Nie Hongyin 鑱堕椿闊? 2011. 鈥淗uayan Sanjie kao鈥?鑿毚涓夊亪鑰? Xixia xue 8.
  Nie Hongyin 鑱堕椿闊? 2012. 鈥淴ixia Fojiao shuyu de laiyuan.鈥濊タ澶忎經鏁欒瑾炵殑渚嗘簮. Xixia wenxian lungao 瑗垮鏂囩嵒璜栫. Shanghai: Shanghai guji.
  Nishida Tatsuo 瑗跨敯榫嶉泟. 1964. Seika go no kenky奴. 瑗垮瑾炪伄鐮旂┒. Tokyo: Zay奴h艒 kank艒kai.
  Nishida Tatsuo 瑗跨敯榫嶉泟. 1976鈥?978. Seika bun Kegon ky艒 瑗垮鏂囪彲鍤寸稉. Kyoto: University of Kyoto Press.
  Nokami Shunj艒 閲庝笂淇婇潨. 1980. 鈥淩y艒dai gakus艒 Shiryokyo ni tsuite鈥?閬间唬瀛稿儳鎬濆瓭 銇仱銇勩仸. Bukky艒 sigaku kai 30 issh奴nen kinen ronsh奴 浣涙暀鍙插鏈?0鍛ㄥ勾瑷樺康璜栭泦 12.
  Ren Jie 浠诲倯. 1999. 鈥淭ongli dashi dui Fangshan kejing shiyede zhongda gongxian鈥?閫氱悊澶у斧灏嶆埧灞卞埢缍撲簨妤殑閲嶅ぇ璨㈢嵒. In 鍛傞惖閶? ed. L眉 Tiegang, Fangshan shijing yanjiu 鎴垮北鐭崇稉鐮旂┒. vol. 1鈥?. Hongkong: Zhongguo fojiao wenhua yanjiusuo, vol. 3, 117鈥?31.
  Rong Xinjiang 姒柊姹? 1996. Guiyi jin shi yanjiu. 姝哥京杌嶅彶鐮旂┒. Shanghai: Shanghai guji.
  Ry奴chi Ab茅. 1999. The weaving of mantra: K奴kai and the construction of esoteric buddhist discourse. New York: Columbia University Press.
  Samosuyk, K. 2006. 袘y写写懈泄c泻a褟 卸懈胁o锌懈c褜 懈蟹 Xapa-Xo褌o XII鈥揦IV 胁e泻o胁,[Buddhist Art from Khara-Khoto, 12th鈥?4th centuries]. St. Petersburg: The State Hermitage Press.
  Shen Weirong 娌堣姒? 2007 鈥淒a cheng yao dao m iji yu xi xia yuan chao suo chuan xi zang mi fa鈥?銆婂ぇ涔樿閬撳瘑闆嗐€嬭垏瑗垮鍏冩湞鎵€鍌宠タ钘忓瘑娉? Zhong hua fo xue xue bao 涓彲浣涘瀛稿牨 20, 138.
  Shen Weirong 娌堣姒?2010. 鈥淐honggou 11鈥?4 shiji Xiy眉 Fojiao shi鈥?閲嶆 11鈥?4 涓栫磤瑗垮煙浣涙暀鍙? Xizang lishi he Fojiao de y眉wexue yanjiu 瑗胯棌姝峰彶鍜屼經鏁欐枃瀛哥爺绌? Shanghai: Shanghai Guji.
  Shi Faxian 閲嬫硶璩? 2005. Zhiyuan Fa bao kantong zongmu 鑷冲厓娉曞鍕樺悓绺介寗. Taibei: Faguang.
  Shi Huida 閲嬫収閬? 2002. 鈥淴injiao Heishui cheng ben Jiewai lu.鈥?鏂版牎榛戞按鍩庢湰銆婂姭澶栭寗銆? Chung-Hwa Foxue xuebao 6.
  Shi Jinbo 鍙查噾娉? 1988. Xixia Fojiao shil眉e 瑗垮浣涙暀鍙茬暐. Yinchuan: Ningxia Renmin chubanshe.
  S酶rensen H. 2011. 鈥淓soteric Buddhism under the Liao. In Esoteric Buddhism and the Tantras in east Asia, eds. Charles Orzech, Henrik S酶rensen, Richard Payne. Leiden: Brill.
  Solonin, K. 2007. Khitan connection of tangut buddhism. In Humanity and nature in Khara-Khoto area, ed. Shen Weirong, et al. Beijing: Renmin University Press.
  Solonin, K. 2008. The glimpses of Tangut buddhism. Central Asiatic Journal 58 (1): 108鈥?27.
  Solonin K. 2009b. The fragments of the Tangut translation of the platform sutra of the sixth Patriarch preserved in the Fu Ssu-nien library, Academia Sinica. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 79 (1).
  Solonin K. 2011. 鈥淴ixia wen Baiyun Shizi Sanguan jiumen chutan鈥?瑗垮鏂囩櫧闆查噵瀛愩€婁笁瑙€涔濋杸銆嬪垵鎺? In Xixia xue 8.
  Solonin K. 2012a. The teaching of Daoshen in Tangut translation: The mirror of mind. In Avata峁僺aka buddhism in east Asia: Huayan, Kegon, flower ornament buddhism: origins and adaptation of a visual culture, eds. Robert Gimello, Fr茅d茅ric Girard and Imre Hamar. Weisbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
  Solonin K. 2012b. The Chan teaching of Nanyang Huizhong (鈥?75) in Tangut Translation. In Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages IV, ed. N. Hill. Leiden: Brill.
  Solonin K. 2012c. 鈥淵ixing Huijue jiqi Dafanggang Fo Huayan jing haiyin daochang shizhong xingyuan chanpian lichan yi.鈥濅竴琛屾収瑕哄強鍏躲€婂ぇ鏂瑰唬浣涜彲鍤寸稉娴峰嵃閬撳牬鍗侀噸琛岄甯稿晶绂嚭鍎€銆? Taida Foxue Yanjiu 鍙板ぇ浣涘鐮旂┒ 23.
  Solonin K. 2012d. 鈥淴ixia Hongzhou wenxian zai kao.鈥?瑗垮娲窞鏂囩嵒鍐嶈€? Zhongguo Chanxue 6.
  Sun Bojun 瀛集鍚? 2008. 鈥淶henzhi yi Foshuo Dabai sangai zongchi tuoluoni jing wei Xixiayiben kao 鐪熸櫤璀€婁經瑾ぇ鐧藉倶钃嬬附鎸侀檧缇呭凹缍撱€嬬偤瑗垮璀湰鑰? In Ningxia Shehui kexue 瀵у鏈冪瀛?vol. 7, 96鈥?01.
  Sun Bojun 瀛集鍚? 2010: 鈥淴ixia wen Xiu Huayan aozhi wangjin huanyuan guan kaoshi 瑗垮鏂囥€婁慨鑿毚濂ф棬濡勭洝閭勬簮瑙€銆嬭€冮噵鈥? In Xixia xue 瑗垮瀛?6 (2).
  Sun Bojun 瀛集鍚?2011. Yuandai Baiyun zong yikan Xixiawen wenxian zongkao鈥?鍏冧唬鐧介洸瀹楄鍒婅タ澶忔枃鏂囩嵒缍滆€? Wenxian 鏂囩嵒 no 2.
  Sun Bojun 瀛集鍚?2012. 鈥淓cang Xixia wen Damo dashi Guanxin lun kaoshi.鈥?淇勮棌榛戞按鍩庛€婇仈鎽╁ぇ甯蹇冭珫銆嬭€冮噵. Xinhuo xiangchuan 钖伀鐩稿偝: Shi Jinbo xiansheng 70 shou lunwenjin 鍙查噾娉㈠厛鐢?0 澹借珫鏂囬泦. Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe.
  Wang Song 鐜嬮爩 2008. Songdai Huayan sixiang yanjiu. 瀹嬩唬鑿毚鎬濇兂鐮旂┒. Beijing: Zongjiao wenhua.
  Wang Yao 鐜嬪牤 1992. 鈥淴ixia Heishui qiao Zangwen bei kaobu鈥?瑗垮榛戞按姗嬭棌鏂囩鑰冭. In 瑗胯棌鏂囧彶鑰冧俊闆? eds. Wang Yao, Xizang wenshi kaoxin ji, 132鈥?55. Gaoxiong: Foguang chubanshe.
  Yoshida Go 鍚夌敯鍓?2004. 鈥淜艒sh奴 Ein in (Kory艒 ji) ni okeru Kegon gaku no doko.鈥?鏉窞鎱у洜闄?楂橀簵瀵?銇亰銇戙倠鑿毚瀛搞伄鍕曞悜. Bukky艒 gaku kenky奴 浣涙暀瀛哥爺绌?
  Yoshihide Yoshizu 鍚夋触瀹滆嫳 1985. Kegon Zen no shis艒-shi kenky奴. 鑿毚绂伄鎬濇兂鍙茬殑鐮旂┒. Tokyo: Daito shuppansha 1985.
  Zongshun 瀹楄垳 2004. 鈥?em class="EmphasisTypeItalic">Ecang Heishui cheng wenxian zhi hanwen Fojiao wenxian x疟kao.鈥?淇勮棌榛戞按鍩庢枃鐛讳箣婕㈡枃浣涙暀鏂囩嵒绾岃€? Dunhuang Yanjiu 5.
  
• 作者单位：K. Solonin (1)
  
  1. Institute of Chinese Classics (鍦嬪闄?, Renmin University, Zhongguan cun 59, Haidian, Beijing, 100872, China
  
• 刊物类别：Social Sciences, general; Economics general; Philosophy;
• 刊物主题：Social Sciences, general; Economics general; Philosophy;
• 出版者：Springer Berlin Heidelberg
• ISSN：2198-2600

文摘

The paper is an attempt to generalize the results of the previous scholarship concerning the nature and specific features of Sinitic Buddhism in the Tangut Empire. The major claim of the paper is that certain dimensions of Tangut Buddhism are traceable to their Sinitic parental tradition, the Buddhism in the Tangut Empire evolved in a specific manner, which was influenced by the Buddhism of the Liao Empire. This implies that Sinitic Buddhism in Xixia was modeled according to the model 鈥減erfect teaching,鈥?promoted by the Liao Buddhists. Thus, the approach based on the traditional 鈥渟chool鈥?(including 鈥淐han School鈥? paradigm is inappropriate for the study of Tangut Buddhism. In this stead I am suggesting a 鈥減erfect鈥?approach, which allows grouping the available texts on the basis of their position in the scheme of the 鈥減erfect teaching鈥?and explores the contents of these texts from this angle. Thus, the specific nature of the texts traditionally deemed as Chan in the Tangut Buddhist system is seen in their relationship to the ultimate practice of the 鈥渃ontemplation of the Dharma realm.鈥?Finally, the paper introduces some new translations from Tangut. Keywords Tangut Buddhism Liao Buddhism Chan Tibetan Buddhism Perfect teaching