Combination of model-based observer and support vector machines for fault detection of wind turbines
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Nassim Laouti (1)
Sami Othman (1)
Mazen Alamir (2)
Nida Sheibat-Othman (1) - 关键词：Fault detection and isolation ; wind turbine ; Kalman ; like observer ; support vector machines ; data ; based classification
- 刊名：International Journal of Automation and Computing
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：June 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：11
- 期：3
- 页码：274-287
- 全文大小：
- 参考文献：1. Y. Amirat, M. E. H. Benbouzid, E. Al-Ahmar, B. Bensaker, S. Turri. A brief status on condition monitoring and fault diagnosis in wind energy conversion systems. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 2629鈥?639, 2009. CrossRef
2. Z. Hameed, Y. S. Hong, Y. M. Cho, S. H. Ahn, C. K. Song. Condition monitoring and fault detection of wind turbines and related algorithms: A review. / Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1鈥?9, 2009. CrossRef
3. B. Lu, Y. Y. Li, X. Wu, Z. Zang. A review of recent advances in wind turbine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. In / Proceedings of the Power Electronics and Machines inWind Applications, IEEE, Lincoln, NE, USA, pp. 1鈥?, 2009.
4. P. F. Odgaard, J. Stoustrup, R. Nielsen, C. Damgaard. Observer based detection of sensor faults in wind turbines. In / Proceedings of European Wind Energy Conference, Marseille, France, 2009.
5. K. Rothenhagen, F. W. Fuchs. Current sensor fault detection and reconfiguration for a doubly fed induction generator. In / Proceedings of IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC), IEEE, Orlando, FL, USA, pp. 2732鈥?738, 2007.
6. P. Poure, P. Weber, D. Theilliol, S. Saadate. Fault-tolerant power electronic converters: Reliability analysis of active power filter. In / Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics ISIE, IEEE, Vigo, Spain, pp. 3174鈥?179, 2007.
7. S. H. Li, D. C. Wunsch, E. A. O鈥橦air, M. G. Giesselmann. Using neural networks to estimate wind turbine power generation. / IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 276鈥?82, 2001. CrossRef
8. M. Schlechtingen, I. F. Santos. Comparative analysis of neural network and regression based condition monitoring approaches for wind turbine fault detection. / Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1849鈥?875, 2011. CrossRef
9. P. F. Odgaard, J. Stoustrup. Estimation of uncertainty bounds for the future performance of a power plant. / IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 199鈥?06, 2009. CrossRef
10. A. Kusiak, W. Y. Li. The prediction and diagnosis of wind turbine faults. / Renewable Energy, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 16鈥?3, 2011. CrossRef
11. T. Barszcz, R. B. Randall. Application of spectral kurtosis for detection of a tooth crack in the planetary gear of a wind turbine. / Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1352鈥?365, 2009. CrossRef
12. P. F. Odgaard, J. Stoustrup, M. Kinnaert. Fault tolerant control of wind turbines: A benchmark model. In / Proceedings of the 7th IFAC Symposium on Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety of Technical Processes, IFAC, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 155鈥?60, 2009.
13. N. Laouti, N. Sheibat-Othman, S. Othman. Support vector machines for fault detection in wind turbines. In / Proceedings of the 18th IFAC World Congress, IFAC, Universit谩 Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy, pp. 7067鈥?07, 2011.
14. X. Zhang, Q. Zhang, S. Zhao, R. M. G. Ferrari, M. M. Polycarpou, T. Parisini. Fault detection and isolation of the wind turbine benchmark: An estimation-based approach. In / Proceedings of the 18th IFAC World Congress, IFAC, Universit谩 Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy, pp. 8295鈥?300, 2011.
15. A. A. Ozdemir, P. Seiler, G. J. Balas. Wind turbine fault detection using counter-based residual thresholding. In / Proceedings of the 18th IFAC World Congress, IFAC, Universit 谩 Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy, pp. 8289鈥?294, 2011.
16. P. L. Negre, V. Vicenc Puig, I. Pineda. Fault detection and isolation of a real wind turbine using LPV observers. In / Proceedings of the 18th IFAC World Congress, IFAC, Universitat Polit猫cnica de Catalunya, Milan, Italy, pp. 12372鈥?2379, 2011.
17. S. Simani, P. Castaldi, M. Bonf. Hybrid model-based fault detection of wind turbine sensors. In / Proceedings of the 18th IFAC World Congress, IFAC, Universit谩 Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy, pp. 7061鈥?066, 2011.
18. B. Ayalew, P. Pisu. Robust fault diagnosis for a horizontal axis wind turbine. In / Proceedings of the 18th IFAC World Congress, IFAC, Universit谩 Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy, pp. 7055鈥?060, 2011.
19. J. F. Dong, M. Verhaegen. Data driven fault detection and isolation of a wind turbine benchmark. In / Proceedings of the 18th IFAC World Congress, IFAC, Universit谩 Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy, pp. 7086鈥?091, 2011.
20. W. Chen, S. X. Ding, A. H. A. Sari, A. Naik, A. Q. Khan, S. Yin. Observer-based FDI schemes for wind turbine benchmark. In / Proceedings of 18th IFAC World Congress, IFAC, Universit谩 Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy, pp. 7073鈥?078, 2011.
21. X. Sun, H. J. Marquez, T. Chen, M. Riaz. An improved PCA method with application to boiler leak detection. / ISA Transactions, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 379鈥?97, 2005. CrossRef
22. S. X. Ding. / Model-based Fault Diagnosis Techniques, Berlin: Springer, 2008.
23. S. Simani, C. Fantuzzi, R. J. Patton. / Model-based Fault Diagnosis in Dynamic Systems Using Identification Techniques, XIV, 298. Series: Advances in Industrial Control. London: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
24. R. Isermann. / Fault-diagnosis Systems from Fault Detection to Fault Tolerance, New York: Springer Verlag, 2006.
25. O. A. Z. Sotomayor, D. Odloak. Observer-based fault diagnosis in chemical plants. / Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 112, no. 1鈥?, pp. 93鈥?08, 2005. CrossRef
26. R. J. Patton, J. Chen. On eigenstructure assignment for robust fault diagnosis. / International Journal of Robust Nonlinear Control, vol. 10, no. 14, pp. 1193鈥?208, 2000. CrossRef
27. C. Edwards, S. K. Spurgeon, R. J. Patton. Sliding mode observers for fault detection and isolation. / Automatica, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 541鈥?53, 2000. CrossRef
28. Y. J. Huang, G. V. Reklaitis, V. A. Venkatasubramanian. Heuristic extended Kalman filter based estimator for fault identification in a fluid catalytic cracking unit. / Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 42, no. 14, pp. 3361鈥?371, 2003. CrossRef
29. P. M. Frank. Fault diagnosis in dyanmic systems using analytical and knowledge-based redundancy 鈥?A survey and some new results. / Automatica, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 459鈥?74, 1990. CrossRef
30. E. A. Garcia, P. M. Frank. Deterministic nonlinear observer-based approaches to fault diagnosis: A survey. / Control Engineering Practice, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 663鈥?70, 1997. CrossRef
31. H. Hammouri, P. Kabor茅, S. Othman, J. Biston. Failure diagnosis and nonlinear observers: Application to a hydraulic process. / Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 339, no. 4鈥?, pp. 455鈥?78, 2002. CrossRef
32. P. Kabor茅, S. Othman, T. F. McKenna, H. Hammouri. Observer based fault diagnosis for a class of non-linear systems: Application to a free radical copolymerisation reaction. / International Journal of Control, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 787鈥?03, 2000. CrossRef
33. C. De Persis, A. Isidori. A geometric approach to nonlinear fault detection and isolation. / IEEE Transactions of Automatic Control, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 853鈥?65, 2001. CrossRef
34. V. N. Vapnik, A. Chervonenkis. A note on one class of perceptrons. / Automation & Remote Control, vol. 25, pp. 821鈥?37, 1964.
35. B. E. Boser, I. M. Guyon, V. N. Vapnik. A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In / Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, ACM Press, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 144鈥?52, 1992.
36. V. N. Vapnik. / The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995. CrossRef
37. A. Widodo, B. S. Yang. Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. / Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 2560鈥?574, 2007. CrossRef
38. L. Meng, Q. H. Wu. Fast training of support vector machines using error-center-based optimization. / International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 6鈥?2, 2005. CrossRef
39. X. Chen, T. Limchimchol. Monitoring grinding wheel redress-life using support vector machines. / International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 56鈥?2, 2006. CrossRef
40. X. H. Huang, X. J. Zeng, M. Wang. SVM-based identification and un-calibrated visual servoing for micromanipulation. / International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 47鈥?4, 2010. CrossRef
41. H. Hammouri, G. Bornard. A high gain observer for a class of uniformly observable systems. In / Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, IEEE, Brighton UK, pp. 1494鈥?496, 1991.
42. V. Cherkassky, Y. Ma. Practical selection of SVM parameters and noise estimation for SVM regression. / Neural Networks, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 113鈥?26, 2004. CrossRef
43. H. Hammouri, J. De Leon Morales. Observer synthesis for state-affine systems. In / Proceedings of the 29th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, IEEE, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, pp. 784鈥?85, 1990. CrossRef - 作者单位：Nassim Laouti (1)
Sami Othman (1)
Mazen Alamir (2)
Nida Sheibat-Othman (1)
1. CNRS, CPE Lyon, UMR 5007, LAGEP, Universit茅 de Lyon, Universit茅 Lyon 1, F-69616, Villeurbanne, France
2. Gipsa-lab/CNRS, University of Grenoble, Rue de la Houille Blanche, 38400, Saint Martin d鈥橦猫res, France - ISSN：1751-8520
文摘
Support vector machines and a Kalman-like observer are used for fault detection and isolation in a variable speed horizontalaxis wind turbine composed of three blades and a full converter. The support vector approach is data-based and is therefore robust to process knowledge. It is based on structural risk minimization which enhances generalization even with small training data set and it allows for process nonlinearity by using flexible kernels. In this work, a radial basis function is used as the kernel. Different parts of the process are investigated including actuators and sensors faults. With duplicated sensors, sensor faults in blade pitch positions, generator and rotor speeds can be detected. Faults of type stuck measurements can be detected in 2 sampling periods. The detection time of offset/scaled measurements depends on the severity of the fault and on the process dynamics when the fault occurs. The converter torque actuator fault can be detected within 2 sampling periods. Faults in the actuators of the pitch systems represents a higher difficulty for fault detection which is due to the fact that such faults only affect the transitory state (which is very fast) but not the final stationary state. Therefore, two methods are considered and compared for fault detection and isolation of this fault: support vector machines and a Kalman-like observer. Advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed. On one hand, support vector machines training of transitory states would require a big amount of data in different situations, but the fault detection and isolation results are robust to variations in the input/operating point. On the other hand, the observer is model-based, and therefore does not require training, and it allows identification of the fault level, which is interesting for fault reconfiguration. But the observability of the system is ensured under specific conditions, related to the dynamics of the inputs and outputs. The whole fault detection and isolation scheme is evaluated using a wind turbine benchmark with a real sequence of wind speed.