Development and application of a throughflow method for high-loaded axial flow compressors

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Bo Li ; ChunWei Gu ; XiaoTang Li ; TaiQiu Liu…
• 关键词：throughflow method ; multi ; stage compressor ; high ; loaded ; loss and deviation angle models ; streamline curvature ; aerodynamic design ; performance prediction
• 刊名：SCIENCE CHINA Technological Sciences
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：January 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：59
• 期：1
• 页码：93-108
• 全文大小：2,363 KB
• 参考文献：1.Gümmer V, Wenger U, Kau H P. Using sweep and dihedral to control three-dimensional flow in transonic stators of axial compressors. J Turbomach, 2001, 123: 40–48CrossRef
  2.Song Y, Gu C W. Effects of curvature continuity of compressor blade profiles on their performances. ASME Turbo Expo 2014, Düsseldorf, 2014, GT2014-25804
  3.Cumpsty N A. Some lessons learned. J Turbomach, 2010, 132: 041018.1–7
  4.Gbadebo S A, Cumpsty N A, Hynes T P. Three-dimensional separations in axial compressors. Jurbomach, 2005, 127: 331–339CrossRef
  5.Huang D G, Wu G Q. Preliminary study on the aerodynamic characteristics of an adaptive reconfigurable airfoil. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2013, 27: 44–48CrossRef
  6.Wang Y, Sun X J, Dai Y J, et al. Numerical investigation of drag reduction byheat-enhanced cavitation. Appl Therm Eng, 2015, 75: 193–202CrossRef
  7.Lichtfuss H J. Customized profiles—The beginning of an era: a short history of blade design. ASME Turbo Expo 2004, Vienna, 2004, GT2004-53742
  8.Hao Z, Gu C, Song Y. Discontinuous galerkin finite element methods for numerical simulations of thermoelasticity. J Therm Stresses, 2015, 38: 983–1004CrossRef
  9.Denton J, Dawes W. Computational fluid dynamics for turbomachinery design. P I Mech Eng C-J Mec, 1998, 213: 107–124CrossRef
  10.Cumpsty N A. Compressor aerodynamics. London: Longman Scientific & Technical, 1989, 93–131
  11.Boyer K M. An improved streamline curvature approach for offdesign analysis of transonic compression systems. Dissertation of Doctor Degree. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2001
  12.Wu C H. A general theory of three-dimensional flow in subsonic and supersonic turbomachines of axial-, radial, and mixed-flow types. NACA-TN-2604. NACA, 1952
  13.Smith L. The radial-equilibrium equation of turbomachinery. J Eng Power, 1966, 88: 1–11CrossRef
  14.Swan W. A practical method of predicting transonic-compressor performance. J Eng Power, 1961, 83: 322–330CrossRef
  15.Novak R. Streamline curvature computing procedures for fluid-flow problems. J Eng Power, 1967, 89: 478–490
  16.Bryans A, Miller M. Computer program for design of multistage axial- flow compressors. NASA-CR-54530, NASA, 1967
  17.Hirsch C, Warzee G. A finite-element method for through flow calculations in turbomachines. J Fluid Eng, 1976, 98: 403–415CrossRef
  18.Miller G R, Hartmann M J. Experimental shock configurations and shock losses in a transonic-compressor rotor at design speed. NACA RM-E58A14B. NACA, 1958
  19.Oldham R K. Some design data for double circular arc compressor blading. NGTE Note NT. 589, 1965
  20.Creveling H F, Carmody R H. Axial flow compressor computer program for calculating off-design performance (Program IV). NASA-CR-72427, NASA, August 1968
  21.Koch C, Smith L. Loss sources and magnitudes in axial-flow compressors. J Eng Power, 1976, 98: 411–424CrossRef
  22.Adkins G G, Smith L H. Spanwise mixing in axial-flow turbomachines. J Eng Power, 1982, 104: 97–110CrossRef
  23.Gallimore S J, Cumpsty N. Spanwise mixing in multistage axial flow compressors. II: Throughflow calculations including mixing. J Turbomach, 1986; 108: 2–16CrossRef
  24.Lieblein S. Loss and stall analysis of compressor cascades. ASME J Basic Eng, 1959, 81: 387–400
  25.Cetin M, Uecer A, Hirsch C, et al. Application of modified loss and deviation correlations to transonic axial compressors. AGARD-R-745, Advisory Group For Aerospace Research and Development Neuilly-Sur-Seine (Fran Ce), 1987
  26.Konig W, Hennecke D, Fottner L. Improved blade profile loss and deviation angle models for advanced transonic compressor bladings. 1. A model for subsonic flow. J Turbomach, 1996, 118: 73–80CrossRef
  27.Konig W, Hennecke D, Fottner L. Improved blade profile loss and deviation angle models for advanced transonic compressor bladings. 2. A model for supersonic flow. J Turbomach, 1996, 118: 81–87CrossRef
  28.Pachidis V, Pilidis P, Templalexis I, et al. An iterative method for blade profile loss model adaptation using streamline curvature. J Eng Gas Turb Power, 2008, 130: 011702.1–8
  29.Li H B, Gu C, Song Y. Through-flow calculation with a cooling model for cooled turbines. P I Mech Eng A-J Pow, 2015, doi: 0957650915594294
  30.Turner M G, Merchant A, Bruna D. A turbomachinery design tool for teaching design concepts for axial-flow fans, compressors, and turbines. ASME Turbo Expo 2006, Barcelona, 2006, GT2006-90105
  31.Petrovic M V, Wiedermann A, Banjac M B. Development and validation of a new universal through flow method for axial compressors. P I Mech Eng A-J Pow, 2010, 224: 869–880
  32.Song Y, Gu C W, Xiao Y B. Numerical and theoretical investigations concerning the continuous-surface-curvature effect in compressor blades. Energies, 2014, 7: 8150–5177CrossRef
  33.Song Y, Gu C W, Ji X X. Development and validation of a full-range performance analysis model for a three-spool gas turbine with turbine cooling. Energy, 2015, 89: 545–557CrossRef
  34.Wang J, Gu C, Sunden B A. Conjugated heat transfer analysis of a film cooling passage with different rib configurations. Int J Numer Method H, 2015, 25: 841–860CrossRef
  35.Lieblein S, Roudebush W H. Theoretical loss relations for low-speed two-dimensional-cascade flow. NACA TN 3662, NACA, 1956
  36.Petrovic M V, Wiedermann A, Banjac M B. Development and validation of a new universal through flow method for axial compressors. ASME Turbo Expo 2009, Orlando, 2009, GT2009-59938
  37.Carter A. The low speed performance of related aerofoils in cascade. ARC CP29, His Maj. Stat. Office, 1950
  38.Creveling H F, Carmody R H. Axial flow compressor computer program for calculating off-design performance. NASA-CR-72472, NASA, 1968
  39.Hearsey R M. Program HT0300 NASA 1994 version. D6-81569TN, 1994
  40.Howell A. Fluid dynamics of axial compressors. P I Mech Eng, 1945, 153: 441–452
  41.Fouflias D, Gannan A, Ramsden K, et al. Experimental investigation of the influence of fouling on compressor cascade characteristics and implications for gas turbine engine performance. P I Mech Eng A-J Pow, 2010, 224: 1007–1018CrossRef
  42.Eftari M, Jouybari H J, Shahhoseini M R, et al. Performance prediction modeling of axial-flow compressor by flow equations. J Mech Res Appl, 2011, 3: 49–55
  43.Lakshminarayana B. Methods of predicting the tip clearance effects in axial flow turbomachinery. J Basic Eng, 1970, 92: 467–482CrossRef
  44.Miller G R, Lewis G W, Hartmann M J. Shock losses in transonic compressor blade rows. J Eng Power, 1961, 83: 235–242CrossRef
  45.Bloch G S, Copenhaver W W, O’Brien W F. A shock loss model for supersonic compressor cascades. J Turbomach, 1999, 121: 28–35CrossRef
  46.Boyer K M O’Brien W F. An improved streamline curvature approach for off-design analysis of transonic axial compression systems. ASME Turbo Expo 2002, Amsterdam, 2002, GT2002-30444
  47.Moeckel W E. Approximate method for predicition form and location of detached shock waves ahead of plane or axially symmetric bodies, NACA TN 1921, NACA, 1949
  48.Howard M, Gallimore S. Viscous throughflow modeling for multistage compressor design. J Turbomach, 1993, 115: 296–304CrossRef
  49.Koch C. Stalling pressure rise capability of axial flow compressor stages. J Eng Power, 1981, 103: 645–656CrossRef
  50.Burdsall E A, Canal E, Lyons K A. Core compressor exit stage study-1: Aerodynamic and mechanical design. NASA CR-159714, NASA, 1979
  51.Behlke R F, Burdsall E A, Canal E, et al. Core compressor exit stage study-2: Final Report. NASA CR-159812, NASA, 1979
  52.Seyler D, Smith L. Single stage experimental evaluation of high Mach number compressor rotor blading, part 1: Design of rotor blading. NASA CR-54581, NASA, 1967
  53.Seyler D, Gestolow J. Single stage experimental evaluation of high Mach number compressor rotor blading, part 2: Performance of Rotor 1B. NASA CR-54582, NASA, 1967
  54.Wisler D, Koch C, Smith L. Preliminary design study of advanced multistage axial flow core compressors. NASA CR-135133, NASA, 1977
  55.Holloway P, Koch C, Knight G, et al. Energy efficient engine. High pressure compressor detail design report. NASA CR-165558, NASA, 1982
  
• 作者单位：Bo Li (1) (3)
  ChunWei Gu (1) (3)
  XiaoTang Li (2)
  TaiQiu Liu (2)
  YaoBing Xiao (1)
  
  1. Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Thermal Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
  3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Aero-Engine, Beijing, 100191, China
  2. Shenyang Engine Design and Research Institute, Shenyang, 110015, China
  
• 刊物类别：Engineering
• 刊物主题：Chinese Library of Science
  Engineering, general
  
• 出版者：Science China Press, co-published with Springer
• ISSN：1869-1900

文摘

In this paper, a novel engineering platform for throughflow analysis based on streamline curvature approach is developed for the research of a 5-stage compressor. The method includes several types of improved loss and deviation angle models, which are combined with the authors’ adjustments for the purpose of reflecting the influences of three-dimensional internal flow in high-loaded multistage compressors with higher accuracy. In order to validate the reliability and robustness of the method, a series of test cases, including a subsonic compressor P&W 3S1, a transonic rotor NASA Rotor 1B and especially an advanced high pressure core compressor GE E3 HPC, are conducted. Then the computation procedure is applied to the research of a 5-stage compressor which is designed for developing an industrial gas turbine. The overall performance and aerodynamic configuration predicted by the procedure, both at design- and part-speed conditions, are analyzed and compared with experimental results, which show a good agreement. Further discussion regarding the universality of the method compared with CFD is made afterwards. The throughflow method is verified as a reliable and convenient tool for aerodynamic design and performance prediction of modern high-loaded compressors. This method is also qualified for use in the further optimization of the 5-stage compressor.