Crossmodal interaction between the mental number line and peripersonal haptic space representation in sighted and blind individuals

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Zaira Cattaneo (1)
  Micaela Fantino (2)
  Carla Tinti (3)
  Juha Silvanto (4) (5)
  Tomaso Vecchi (2)
  
• 刊名：Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
• 出版年：2010
• 出版时间：May 2010
• 年：2010
• 卷：72
• 期：4
• 页码：885-890
• 全文大小：136KB
• 参考文献：1. Baek, M. J., Lee, B. H., Kwon, J. C., Park, J. M., Kang, S. J., Chin, J., et al. (2002). Influence of final search direction on tactile line bisection in normal subjects. / Neurology, 58, 1833鈥?838.
  2. Bonato, M., Priftis, K., Marenzi, R. , & Zorzi, M. (2008). Modulation of hemispatial neglect by directional and numerical cues in the line bisection task. / Neuropsychologia, 46, 426鈥?33. CrossRef
  3. Bowers, D. , & Heilman, K. M. (1980). Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. / Neuropsychologia, 18, 491鈥?98. CrossRef
  4. Brozzoli, C., Ishihara, M., G枚bel, S. M., Salemme, R., Rossetti, Y. , & Farn猫, A. (2008). Touch perception reveals the dominance of spatial over digital representation of numbers. / Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 5644鈥?648. CrossRef
  5. Castronovo, J. , & Seron, X. (2007). Semantic numerical representation in blind subjects: The role of vision in the spatial format of the mental number line. / Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 101鈥?19. CrossRef
  6. Cattaneo, Z., Silvanto, J., Pascual-Leone, A. , & Battelli, L. (2009). The middle range of the number line orients attention to the left side of visual space. / Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 235鈥?46. CrossRef
  7. Collignon, O., Voss, P., Lassonde, M. , & Lepore, F. (2009). Crossmodal plasticity for the spatial processing of sounds in visually deprived subjects. / Experimental Brain Research, 192, 343鈥?58. CrossRef
  8. Conson, M., Mazzarella, E. , & Trojano, L. (2009). Numbers are represented in egocentric space: Effects of numerical cues and spatial reference frames on hand laterality judgements. / Neuroscience Letters, 452, 176鈥?80. CrossRef
  9. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S. , & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. / Journal of Experimental Psychology, 122, 371鈥?96.
  10. De Hevia, M. D., Girelli, L. , & Vallar, G. (2006). Numbers and space: A cognitive illusion? / Experimental Brain Research, 168, 254鈥?64. CrossRef
  11. Fischer, M. H. (2001). Number processing induces spatial performance biases. / Neurology, 57, 822鈥?26.
  12. Scher, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D. , & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. / Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555鈥?56. CrossRef
  13. Galfano, G., Rusconi, E. , & Umilt脿, C. (2006). Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one鈥檚 will. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 869鈥?74. CrossRef
  14. Gaunet, F. , & Rossetti, Y. (2006). Effects of visual deprivation on space representation: Immediate and delayed pointing toward memorised proprioceptive targets. / Perception, 35, 107鈥?24. CrossRef
  15. Jewell, G. , & McCourt, M. E. (2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. / Neuropsychologia, 38, 93鈥?10. CrossRef
  16. Laeng, B., Buchtel, H. A. , & Butter, C. M. (1996). Tactile rod bisection: Hemispheric activation and sex differences. / Neuropsychologia, 34, 1115鈥?121. CrossRef
  17. McCourt, M. E. , & Jewell, G. (1999). Visuospatial attention in line bisection: Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. / Neuropsychologia, 37, 843鈥?55. CrossRef
  18. Mesulam, M. M. (2000). / Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  19. Nicholls, M. E. R., Loftus, A. M. , & Gevers, W. (2008). Look, no hands: A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 413鈥?18. CrossRef
  20. Nuerk, H.-C., Wood, G. , & Willmes, K. (2005). The universal SNARC effect: The association between number magnitude and space is amodal. / Experimental Psychology, 52, 187鈥?94.
  21. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. / Neuropsychologia, 9, 97鈥?13. CrossRef
  22. Postma, A., Zuidhoek, S., Noordzij, M. L. , & Kappers, A. M. L. (2008). Haptic orientation perception benefits from visual experience: Evidence from early-blind, late-blind, and sighted people. / Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1197鈥?206. CrossRef
  23. Putzar, L., Goerendt, I., Lange, K., R枚sler, F. , & R枚der, B. (2007). Early visual deprivation impairs multisensory interactions in humans. / Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1243鈥?245. CrossRef
  24. Ristic, J., Wright, A. , & Kingstone, A. (2006). The number line effect reflects top-down control. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 862鈥?68. CrossRef
  25. R枚der, B., F枚cker, J., H枚tting, K. , & Spence, C. (2008). Spatial coordinate systems for tactile spatial attention depend on developmental vision: Evidence from event-related potentials in sighted and congenitally blind adult humans. / European Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 475鈥?83. CrossRef
  26. R枚der, B., Kusmierek, A., Spence, C. , & Schicke, T. (2007). Developmental vision determines the reference frame for the multisensory control of action. / Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 4753鈥?758. CrossRef
  27. R枚der, B., R枚sler, F. , & Spence, C. (2004). Early vision impairs tactile perception in the blind. / Current Biology, 14, 121鈥?24.
  28. Rossetti, Y. (1998). Implicit short-lived motor representations of space in brain damaged and healthy subjects. / Consciousness & Cognition, 7, 520鈥?58. CrossRef
  29. Rossetti, Y. , & Pisella, L. (2002). Several 鈥渧ision for action鈥?systems: A guide to dissociating and integrating dorsal and ventral functions. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), / Attention and performance XIX: Common mechanisms in perception and action (pp. 62鈥?19). New York: Oxford University Press.
  30. Rossetti, Y. , & R茅gnier, C. (1995). Representations in action: Pointing to a target with various representations. In B. G. Bardy, R. J. Bootsma, & Y. Guiard (Eds.), / Studies in perception and action III (pp. 233鈥?36). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  31. Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H. , & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 328鈥?31. CrossRef
  32. Struiksma, M. E., Noordzij, M. L. , & Postma, A. (2009). What is the link between language and spatial images? Behavioral and neural findings in blind and sighted individuals. / Acta Psychologica, 132, 145鈥?56. CrossRef
  33. Sz眉cs, D. , & Cs茅pe, V. (2005). The parietal distance effect appears in both the congenitally blind and matched sighted controls in an acoustic number comparison task. / Neuroscience Letters, 384, 11鈥?6. CrossRef
  34. Travieso, D. , & Lederman, S. J. (2007). Assessing subclinical tactual deficits in the hand function of diabetic blind persons at risk for peripheral neuropathy. / Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 88, 1662鈥?672. CrossRef
  35. Umilt谩, C., Priftis, K. , & Zorzi, M. (2009). The spatial representation of numbers: Evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect. / Experimental Brain Research, 192, 561鈥?69. CrossRef
  36. Vallar, G. (2001). Extrapersonal visual unilateral spatial neglect and its neuroanatomy. / NeuroImage, 14, S52-S58. CrossRef
  37. Wood, G., Nuerk, H. C. , & Willmes, K. (2006). Crossed hands and the SNARC effect: A failure to replicate Dehaene, Bossini and Giraux (1993). / Cortex, 42, 1069鈥?079. CrossRef
  38. Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H.-C. , & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. / Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 489鈥?25.
  39. Zuidhoek, S., Kappers, A. M. L., van der Lubbe, R. H. A. , & Postma, A. (2003). Delay improves performance on a haptic spatial matching task. / Experimental Brain Research, 149, 320鈥?30.
  
• 作者单位：Zaira Cattaneo (1)
  Micaela Fantino (2)
  Carla Tinti (3)
  Juha Silvanto (4) (5)
  Tomaso Vecchi (2)
  
  1. Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell鈥橝teneo Nuovo, Milano, Italy
  2. University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
  3. University of Turin, Turin, Italy
  4. University College London, London, England
  5. Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland
  

文摘

Humans tend to represent numbers in the form of a mental number line. Here we show that the mental number line can modulate the representation of peripersonal haptic space in a crossmodal fashion and that this interaction is not visually mediated. Sighted and early-blind participants were asked to haptically explore rods of different lengths and to indicate midpoints of those rods. During each trial, either a small (2) or a large (8) number was presented in the auditory modality. When no numbers were presented, participants tended to bisect the rods to the left of the actual midpoint, consistent with the notion of pseudoneglect. In both groups, this bias was significantly increased by the presentation of a small number and was significantly reduced by the presentation of a large number. Hence, spatial shifts of attention induced by number processing are not limited to visual space or embodied responses but extend to haptic peripersonal space and occur crossmodally without requiring the activation of a visuospatial representation.