CT/MRI pelvimetry as a useful tool when selecting patients with rectal cancer for transanal total mesorectal excision

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Alexander Ferko ; Ondřej Malý ; Július Örhalmi ; Josef Dolejš
• 关键词：Rectal cancer ; Low anterior resection ; Total mesorectal excision ; TME quality ; Transanal approach ; TaTME
• 刊名：Surgical Endoscopy
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：March 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：30
• 期：3
• 页码：1164-1171
• 全文大小：663 KB
• 参考文献：1.Laurent C, Leblanc F, Wütrich P, Scheffler M, Rullier E (2009) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results. Ann Surg 250:54–61. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3181ad6511​ CrossRef PubMed
  2.Parfitt JR, Driman DK (2007) The total mesorectal excision specimen for rectal cancer: a review of its pathological assessment. J Clin Pathol 60:849–855. doi:10.​1136/​jcp.​2006.​043802 PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  3.Lin H-H, Lin J-K, Lin C-C, Lan Y-T, Wang H-S, Yang S-H, Jiang J-K, Chen W-S, Lin T-C, Liang W-Y, Chang S-C (2013) Circumferential margin plays an independent impact on the outcome of rectal cancer patients receiving curative total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 206:771–777. doi:10.​1016/​j.​amjsurg.​2013.​03.​009 CrossRef PubMed
  4.Leonard D, Penninckx F, Fieuws S, Jouret-Mourin A, Sempoux C, Jehaes C, Van Eycken E (2010) Factors predicting the quality of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 252:982–988. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3181efc142​ CrossRef PubMed
  5.Jeyarajah S, Sutton CD, Miller AS, Hemingway D (2007) Factors that influence the adequacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 9:808–815. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1463-1318.​2007.​01256.​x CrossRef PubMed
  6.Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, Ueno M, Miyata S, Yamaguchi T (2009) Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Surgery 146:483–489. doi:10.​1016/​j.​surg.​2009.​03.​030 CrossRef PubMed
  7.Ogiso S, Yamaguchi T, Hata H, Fukuda M, Ikai I, Yamato T, Sakai Y (2011) Evaluation of factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: “narrow pelvis” is not a contraindication. Surg Endosc 25:1907–1912. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-1485-0 CrossRef PubMed
  8.Veenhof AAFA, Engel AF, van der Peet DL, Sietses C, Meijerink WJHJ, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, Cuesta MA (2008) Technical difficulty grade score for the laparoscopic approach of rectal cancer: a single institution pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:469–475. doi:10.​1007/​s00384-007-0433-5 PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  9.Seki Y, Ohue M, Sekimoto M, Takiguchi S, Takemasa I, Ikeda M, Yamamoto H, Monden M (2007) Evaluation of the technical difficulty performing laparoscopic resection of a rectosigmoid carcinoma: visceral fat reflects technical difficulty more accurately than body mass index. Surg Endosc 21:929–934. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-006-9084-9 CrossRef PubMed
  10.Akiyoshi T, Watanabe T, Ueno M (2011) Pelvic dimensions as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25:3122–3123. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-011-1649-6 CrossRef PubMed
  11.Brannigan AE, De Buck S, Suetens P, Penninckx F, D’Hoore A (2006) Intracorporeal rectal stapling following laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: overcoming a challenge. Surg Endosc 20:952–955. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-005-0536-4 CrossRef PubMed
  12.Targarona EM, Balague C, Pernas JC, Martinez C, Berindoague R, Gich I, Trias M (2008) Can we predict immediate outcome after laparoscopic rectal surgery? Multivariate analysis of clinical, anatomic, and pathologic features after 3-dimensional reconstruction of the pelvic anatomy. Ann Surg 247:642–649. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3181612c6a​ CrossRef PubMed
  13.Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S (2010) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc 24:2200–2205. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-0927-z CrossRef PubMed
  14.Atallah S, Albert M, Debeche-Adams T, Larach S (2013) Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS): applications beyond local excision. Tech Coloproctol 17:239–243. doi:10.​1007/​s10151-012-0945-z CrossRef PubMed
  15.Atallah S, Albert M, DeBeche-Adams T, Nassif G, Polavarapu H, Larach S (2013) Transanal minimally invasive surgery for total mesorectal excision (TAMIS-TME): a stepwise description of the surgical technique with video demonstration. Tech Coloproctol 17:321–325. doi:10.​1007/​s10151-012-0971-x CrossRef PubMed
  16.McLemore EC, Coker AM, Devaraj B, Chakedis J, Maawy A, Inui T, Talamini MA, Horgan S, Peterson MR, Sylla P, Ramamoorthy S (2013) TAMIS-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision in a cadaveric series. Surg Endosc 27:3478–3484. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-013-2889-4 PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  17.Lim S-B, Seo S-I, Lee JL, Kwak JY, Jang TY, Kim CW, Yoon YS, Yu CS, Kim JC (2012) Feasibility of transanal minimally invasive surgery for mid-rectal lesions. Surg Endosc 26:3127–3132. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-012-2303-7 CrossRef PubMed
  18.Killeen T, Banerjee S, Vijay V, Al-Dabbagh Z, Francis D, Warren S (2010) Magnetic resonance (MR) pelvimetry as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic operations for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2974–2979. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-010-1075-1 CrossRef PubMed
  19.Wang C, Xiao Y, Qiu H, Yao J, Pan W (2014) Factors affecting operating time in laparoscopic anterior resection of rectal cancer. World J Surg Oncol 12:44. doi:10.​1186/​1477-7819-12-44 PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  20.Boyle KM, Petty D, Chalmers AG, Quirke P, Cairns A, Finan PJ, Sagar PM, Burke D (2005) MRI assessment of the bony pelvis may help predict resectability of rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 7:232–240. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1463-1318.​2005.​00819.​x CrossRef PubMed
  21.Salerno G, Daniels IR, Brown G, Norman AR, Moran BJ, Heald RJ (2007) Variations in pelvic dimensions do not predict the risk of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in rectal cancer. World J Surg 31:1313–1320. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-007-9007-5 CrossRef PubMed
  22.Salerno G, Daniels IR, Brown G, Heald RJ, Moran BJ (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging pelvimetry in 186 patients with rectal cancer confirms an overlap in pelvic size between males and females. Colorectal Dis 8:772–776. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1463-1318.​2006.​01090.​x CrossRef PubMed
  
• 作者单位：Alexander Ferko (1)
  Ondřej Malý (1) (2)
  Július Örhalmi (1)
  Josef Dolejš (3)
  
  1. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
  2. Faculty of Military Health Sciences, University of Defense in Brno, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
  3. Department of Informatics and Quantitative Methods, Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
  
• 刊物类别：Medicine
• 刊物主题：Medicine & Public Health
  Surgery
  Gynecology
  Gastroenterology
  Hepatology
  Proctology
  Abdominal Surgery
  
• 出版者：Springer New York
• ISSN：1432-2218

文摘

Background The quality of a total mesorectal excision (TME) is one of the most important prognostic factors for local recurrence of rectal carcinoma. The aim of this study was to clarify the manner in which lesser pelvis dimensions affect the quality of TME via the transabdominal approach, while simultaneously defining the criteria for selecting patients most likely to have Grade 3 TME outcomes for a transanal approach using the TaTME technique.