Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Interobserver Reliability of the Blinded Scratch-Collapse Test

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Robin D. Blok (1)
  Stéphanie J. E. Becker (1)
  David C. Ring (1)
  
• 关键词：Scratch ; collapse test ; Interobserver reliability ; Carpal tunnel syndrome
• 刊名：Journal of Hand and Microsurgery
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：June 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：6
• 期：1
• 页码：5-7
• 全文大小：
• 参考文献：1. Aroori S, Spence RA (2008) Carpal tunnel syndrome. Ulster Med J 77:6-7
  2. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I (1999) Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 282:153-58 p://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.2.153" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  3. Prime MS, Palmer J, Khan WS, Goddard NJ (2010) Is there light at the end of the tunnel? Controversies in the diagnosis and management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Hand (N Y) 5:354-60 p://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11552-010-9263-y" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  4. Cheng CJ, Mackinnon-Patterson B, Beck JL, Mackinnon SE (2008) Scratch collapse test for evaluation of carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Am] 33:1518-524 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.05.022" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  5. Gillenwater J, Cheng J, Mackinnon SE (2011) Evaluation of the scratch collapse test in peroneal nerve compression. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:933-39 p://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f95c36" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  6. Makanji HS, Becker SJ, Mudgal CS, Jupiter JB, Ring D (2013) Evaluation of the scratch collapse test for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. doi:pan class="a-plus-plus non-url-ref">10.1177/1753193413497191
  7. Crewson PE (2005) Reader agreement studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1391-397 p://dx.doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.5.01841391" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  8. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-74 p://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2529310" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  9. de Krom MC, Knipschild PG, Kester AD, Thijs CT, Boekkooi PF, Spaans F (1992) Carpal tunnel syndrome: prevalence in the general population. J Clin Epidemiol 45:373-76 p://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(92)90038-O" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  10. Katz JN, Larson MG, Sabra A, Krarup C, Stirrat CR, Sethi R et al (1990) The carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic utility of the history and physical examination findings. Ann Intern Med 112:321-27 p://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-112-5-321" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Robin D. Blok (1)
  Stéphanie J. E. Becker (1)
  David C. Ring (1)
  
  1. Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Yawkey Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Suite 2100, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
  
• ISSN：0974-6897

文摘

The reliability of the scratch-collapse test for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) has not been tested by independent investigators. This study measured the reliability of the scratch-collapse test comparing the treating hand surgeon and blinded evaluators. We performed a prospective observational study of 41 patients with a provisional diagnosis of CTS or a combination of CTS and cubital tunnel syndrome and prescribed electrodiagnostic testing. The treating hand surgeon performed the scratch-collapse test. Next, the test was administered by one of the six observers, unaware of the patient’s symptoms and the diagnosis made by treating hand surgeon. The kappa statistic (κ) was used to calculate the interrater reliability between the treating hand surgeons and blinded scratchers. The agreement between the blinded observers and the hand surgeons on the scratch-collapse test was substantial 0.63 (95?% CI, 0.34-.87; p-lt;-.001). The sensitivity of the blinded scratch test in our sample was 32?%. In a small study with a spectrum bias favoring electrophysiologically confirmed CTS the reliability was lower than that reported by the inventors of the test, but was still substantial. We propose a larger study of patients with a greater variety of electrodiagnostic test results using fewer observers with more experience.