Reduced visual feature binding in the near-hand space
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Davood G. Gozli (1)
Julie Ardron (1)
Jay Pratt (1) - 关键词：Feature integration ; Binding ; Event files ; Hand proximity ; Visual pathways
- 刊名：Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：July 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：76
- 期：5
- 页码：1308-1317
- 全文大小：523 KB
- 参考文献：1. Abrams, R. A., Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Knapp, W. H., III, & Paull, D. (2008). Altered vision near the hands. / Cognition, 107, 1035-047. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.006 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.006" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
2. Abrams, R. A., & Weidler, B. J. (2014). Trade-offs in visual processing for stimuli near the hands. / Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0583-1
3. Barense, M. D., Bussey, T. J., Lee, A. C. H., Rogers, T. T., Davies, R. R., Saksida, L. M., & Graham, K. S. (2005). Functional specialization in the human medial temporal lobe. / Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 10239-0246. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2704-05.2005 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2704-05.2005" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
4. Barense, M. D., Gaffan, D., & Graham, K. S. (2007). The human medial temporal lobe processes online representations of complex objects. / Neuropsychologia, 45, 2963-974. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.023" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
5. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. / Spatial Vision, 10, 433-36. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357 10.1163/156856897X00357" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
6. Breitmeyer, B. G., & Breier, J. I. (1994). Effects of background color on reaction time to stimuli varying in size and contrast: Inferences about human M channels. / Vision Research, 34, 1039-045. 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90008-6" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
7. Chan, D., Peterson, M. A., Barense, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2013). How action influences object perception. / Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 462. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00462
8. Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Montana, J., Garverick, S., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). When meaning matters, look but don’t touch: The effects of posture on reading. / Memory & Cognition, 38, 555-62. doi:10.3758/MC.38.5.555 10.3758/MC.38.5.555" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
9. Derrington, A. M., & Lennie, P. (1984). Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. / Journal of Physiology, 357, 219-40.
10. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-17. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.501 10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.501" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
11. Ganel, T., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape. / Nature, 426, 664-67. doi:10.1038/nature02156 10.1038/nature02156" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
12. Goodale, M. A., Cant, J. S., & Króliczak, G. (2006). Grasping the past and present: When does visuomotor priming occur? In H. ??men & B. G. Breitmeyer (Eds.), / The first half second: The microgenesis and temporal dynamics of unconscious and conscious visual processes (pp. 51-2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Goodhew, S. C., Gozli, D. G., Ferber, S., & Pratt, J. (2013). Reduced temporal fusion in near-hand space. / Psychological Science, 24, 891-00. doi:10.1177/0956797612463402 10.1177/0956797612463402" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
14. Gozli, D. G., West, G. L., & Pratt, J. (2012). Hand position alters vision by biasing processing through different visual pathways. / Cognition, 124, 244-50. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.04.008" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
15. Hommel, B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus–response compatibility. / Advances in Psychology, 118, 281-20. 10.1016/S0166-4115(97)80041-6" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
16. Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus–response episodes. / Visual Cognition, 5, 183-16. doi:10.1080/713756773 10.1080/713756773" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
17. Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. / Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494-00. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
18. Hommel, B., Kray, J., & Lindenberger, U. (2011). Feature integration across the lifespan: Stickier stimulus–response bindings in children and older adults. / Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 268. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00268
19. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman & D. A. Davies (Eds.), / Varieties of attention (pp. 29-1). New York, NY: Academic Press.
20. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. / Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-19. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90007-O 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90007-O" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
21. Keizer, A. W., Verment, R., & Hommel, B. (2010). Enhancing cognitive control through neurofeedback: A role of gamma-band activity in managing episodic retrieval. / NeuroImage, 49, 3404-413. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.023" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
22. Kramer, A. F., & Jacobson, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. / Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267-84. doi:10.3758/BF03206750 10.3758/BF03206750" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
23. Kveraga, K., Boshyan, J., & Bar, M. (2007). Magnocellular projections as the trigger of top-down facilitation in recognition. / Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 13232-3240. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3481-07.2007" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
24. Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. / Science, 240, 740-49. doi:10.1126/science.3283936 10.1126/science.3283936" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
25. Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. / Psychophysiology, 31, 291-08. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02218.x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
26. Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861-72. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.23.3.861
27. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. / Spatial Vision, 10, 437-42. doi:10.1163/156856897X00366 10.1163/156856897X00366" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
28. Previc, F. H. (1998). The neuropsychology of 3-D space. / Psychological Bulletin, 124, 123-64. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.123 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.123" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
29. Qian, C., Al-Aidroos, N., West, G., Abrams, R. A., & Pratt, J. (2012). The visual P2 is attenuated for attended objects near the hands. / Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 98-04. 10.1080/17588928.2012.658363" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
30. Reynolds, M., Kwan, D., & Smilek, D. (2010). To group or not to group. / Experimental Psychology, 57, 275-91. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000033" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
31. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. / Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-36. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
32. Tseng, P., & Bridgeman, B. (2011). Improved change detection with nearby hands. / Experimental Brain Research, 209, 257-69. 10.1007/s00221-011-2544-z" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
33. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), / Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-86). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Weidler, B. J., & Abrams, R. A. (2014). Enhanced cognitive control near the hands. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0514-0
35. West, G. L., Anderson, A. K., Bedwell, J. S., & Pratt, J. (2010). Red diffuse light suppresses the accelerated perception of fear. / Psychological Science, 21, 992-99. doi:10.1177/0956797610371966 10.1177/0956797610371966" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
36. Witt, J. K., Linkenauger, S. A., Bakdash, J. Z., & Proffitt, D. R. (2008). Putting to a bigger hole: Golf performance relates to perceived size. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 581-85. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.3.581 10.3758/PBR.15.3.581" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
37. Wohlschl?ger, A. (2000). Visual motion priming by invisible actions. / Vision Research, 40, 925-30. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00239-4 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00239-4" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
38. Yeshurun, Y. (2004). Isoluminant stimuli and red background attenuate the effects of transient spatial attention on temporal resolution. / Vision Research, 44, 1375-387. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.016 10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.016" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef - 作者单位：Davood G. Gozli (1)
Julie Ardron (1)
Jay Pratt (1)
1. Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G3, Canada - ISSN：1943-393X
文摘
Growing evidence suggests that visual information is processed differently in the near-hand space, relative to the space far from the hands. To account for the existing literature, we recently proposed that the costs and benefits of hand proximity may be due to differential contributions of the action-oriented magnocellular (M) and the perception-oriented parvocellular (P) pathways. Evidence suggests that, relative to the space far from the hands, in near-hand space the contribution of the M pathway increases while the contribution of the P pathway decreases. The present study tested an important consequence of this account for visual representation. Given the P pathway’s role in feeding regions in which visual representations of unified objects (with bound features) are formed, we predicted that hand proximity would reduce feature binding. Consistent with this prediction, two experiments revealed signs of reduced feature binding in the near-hand space, relative to the far-hand space. We propose that the higher contribution of the M pathway, along with the reduced contribution of the P pathway, shifts visual perception away from an object-based perceptual mode toward a feature-based mode. These results are discussed in light of the distinction between action-oriented and perception-oriented vision.