Wash durability and optimal drying regimen of four brands of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets after repeated washing under tropical conditions
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Francis K Atieli (1)
Stephen O Munga (1)
Ayub V Ofulla (2)
John M Vulule (1) - 刊名：Malaria Journal
- 出版年：2010
- 出版时间：December 2010
- 年：2010
- 卷：9
- 期：1
- 全文大小：537KB
- 参考文献：1. WHO: Fourth update on long lasting insecticide nets. Current status and programmatic issues. [http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/updatellin_4.pdf]
2. WHO: Fifth update on long-lasting insecticidal nets: PermaNet ? 2.0, a New LLITN Recommended by WHO. [http://rbm.who.int/docs/updateLLN_5.htm]
3. WHOPES: Review of Spinosad 0.5% GR and 12% SC, Lambda-Cyhalothrin 10% CS, K-O TAB 1--3 ?, Interceptor ? 2007 . Report of the 10th WHOPES Working Group. [http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2007/WHO_CDS_NTD_WHOPES_2007_1_eng.pdf]
4. WHO: Recommended long-lasting insecticidal mosquito nets. [http://www.who.int/whopes/Long-lasting_insecticidal_nets_ok2.pdf]
5. Gimnig JE, Mibangiombe M, Chivasse D, Mkandala C, Mount DL, Atieli F, Wolkon A, Chizani N, Hawley WA, Campell CH, Steketee RW: Evaluation of a long lasting mosquito net in Blantyre District, Malawi. / Am J Trop Med Hyg 2003, 3:450-51.
6. Kayedi G, Maxwell MH, Kaur C, Rehman H, Malima R, Curtis CF, Lines JD, Rowland MW: Multi-country field trials comparing wash resistance of PermaNet?and conventional insecticide treated nets against Anopheline and culicine mosquitoes. / Med Vet Entomol 2005, 19:72-3. CrossRef
7. Kulkarni M: Update on long lasting insecticidal nets. [http://www.healthbridge.ca/assets/images/pdf/Malaria/MalariaMatters_15.pdf]
8. Lindblade KA, Dotson E, Hawley WA, Bayoh N, Williamson J, Mount D, Olang G, Vulule J, Slutsker L, Gimnig J: Evaluation of long-lasting insecticidal nets after 2 years of household use. / Trop Med Int Health 2005, 10:1141-150. CrossRef
9. Smith SC, Joshi UB, Grabowsky M, Selanikio J, Nobiya T, Aapore T: Evaluation of bed-nets after 38 months of household use in Northwest Ghana. / Am J Trop Med Hyg 2007, 77:243-48.
10. Killian A, Byamukama W, Pigeon O, Atieli F, Duchon S, Phan C: Long-term field performance of a polyester-based long-lasting insecticidal mosquito net in rural Uganda. / Malar J 2008, 7:49. CrossRef
11. WHOPES: Report of the 12 th WHOPES Working Group meeting - Review of Bioflash ? GR, Permanet ? 2.0, Permanet ? 3.0, Permanet ? 2.5, Lambda-cyhalothrin LN. 8-1 December 2008, Geneva, World Health Organization, 2008. [http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2009/WHO_HTM_NTD_WHOPES_2009_1_eng.pdf]
12. WHOPES: Report of the 13th WHOPES Working Group meeting - Review of Olyset ? LN, Dawaplus ? 2.0 LN, Tianjin Yorkool ? LN. 28-0 July 2009, Geneva, World Health Organization, 2009. [http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241598712_eng.pdf]
13. WHOPES: Guidelines for Laboratory and field testing of Long Lasting Insecticidal Mosquito Nets. 2005. [http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2005/WHO_CDS_WHOPES_GCDPP_2005.11.pdf]
14. Kayedi MH, Lines JD, Haghdoosta AA, Vatandoostd MH, Rassid Y, Khamisabadi K: Evaluation of the effects of repeated hand washing, sunlight, smoke and dirt on the persistence of deltamethrin on insecticide-treated nets. / Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2008, 102:811-16. CrossRef
15. Morris SE, Davies NW, Brown PH, Groom T: Effect of drying conditions on pyrethrins content. / Industrial Crops and Products 2006, 23:9-4. CrossRef
16. Jeyalakshmi T, Shanmugasundaram R, Balakrishna MP: Comparative efficacy and persistency of permethrin in Olyset net and conventionally treated nets against and Anopheles stephensi . / J Am Mosq Cont Assoc 2006, 22:107-10. CrossRef
17. Sharma SK, Upadhyay AK, Haque MA, Padhan K, Tyagi PK, Ansari MA, Dash AP: Wash resistance and bioefficacy of Olyset net -- a long-lasting insecticide-treated mosquito net against malaria vectors and nontarget household pests. / J Med Entom 2006, 43:884-88. CrossRef
18. Gimnig JE, Lindblade KL, Mount DL, Atieli FK, Crawford S, Wolkon A, Hawley WA Dotson EM: Laboratory wash resistance of long-lasting insecticidal nets. / Trop Med Int Health 2005, 10:1022-029. CrossRef
19. Armstrong DW, Young X, Han SM, Menges RA: Direct liquid chromatographic separation of racemates with an a-cyclodextrin bonded phase. / Anal Chem 1987, 59:2584-596.
20. Sreeharil U, Raghavendral K, Rizvi MMA, Dashl AP: Wash resistance and efficacy of three long-lasting insecticidal nets assessed from bioassays on Anopheles culicifacies and Anopheles stephensi . / Trop Med Int Health 2009, 14:597-02. CrossRef
21. Kayedi MH, Lines JD, Haghdoosta AA, Behrahi A, Khamisabadi K: Entomological evaluation of three brands of manufactured insecticidal nets and of conventionally treated with deltamethrin, after repeated washing. / Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2007, 101:449-56. CrossRef - 作者单位：Francis K Atieli (1)
Stephen O Munga (1)
Ayub V Ofulla (2)
John M Vulule (1)
1. Kenya Medical Research Institute, Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya
2. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Maseno University, Kenya
文摘
Background The current study was undertaken to determine the optimal wash-drying regimen and the effects of different washing procedures on the efficacy, and durability of four brands of newly introduced long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) under tropical conditions. Methods In the current study, the following four LLINs were tested: Olyset?, PermaNet ?2.0, BASF? and TNT?. Nets were divided into three sets; one set was washed by hand rubbing and air-dried either hanging or spread on the ground in direct sunlight or hanging or spread on the ground under the shade. A second set was washed using the WHO protocol (machine) and the third set was washed by beating the nets on rocks. The biological activities of the nets were assessed by a three-minute bioassay cone test and the residual insecticide contents were determined using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) procedure. Results Nets that were dried hanging under the shade retained more insecticide, 62.5% and recorded higher mortality compared to nets which were dried lying on the ground in direct sunlight 58.8%, nets dried under the shade spread on the ground 56.3%, and 57.8% for nets dried hanging in direct sunlight. It was also observed that nets washed by the standard WHO protocol, retained more insecticide and were more effective in killing mosquitoes compared to nets washed by local methods of hand rubbing and beating on rocks. There were significant differences between drying regimens (p < 0.0001) and between washing procedures (p < 0.001) respectively. However, the effect of net type was statistically insignificant. The statistical differences on individual nets were also compared, for PermaNet? and TNT there were no significant differences observed between the four drying regimens (p = 0.7944 and 0.4703) respectively). For BASF and Olyset, the differences were significant (p < 0.001 and p > 0.0001). Conclusion The results of this study suggest that washing and drying regimen influence the insecticidal activity of LLINs. The standard WHOPES washing protocol underestimates the amount of insecticide washed from LLINs compared to the abrasive washing procedures that are used in the field. This suggests that there is need to educate net users to adopt a more gentle washing procedure while handling LLINs. The education should accompany net distribution campaigns.