用户名: 密码: 验证码:
Machines and the Moral Community
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Erica L. Neely (1)
  • 关键词:Moral patiency ; Moral community ; Artificial intelligence ; Intelligent machines ; Conscious machines ; Machine rights ; Robot ethics
  • 刊名:Philosophy & Technology
  • 出版年:2014
  • 出版时间:March 2014
  • 年:2014
  • 卷:27
  • 期:1
  • 页码:97-111
  • 全文大小:210 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Asaro, P. (2012). A body to kick, but still no soul to damn. In P. Lin, K. Abney, & G. A. Bekey (Eds.), / Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
    2. Basl, J. (2012). Machines as Moral Patients We Shouldn鈥檛 Care About (Yet): The Interests and Welfare of Current Machines. In D. J. Gunkel, J. J. Bryson, and S. Torrance (Eds.), / Proceedings of the AISB/IACAP World Congress 2012: The Machine Question: AI, Ethics and Moral Responsibility. Birmingham, England.
    3. Bentham, J. (1996). / An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. J.H. Burns and H.L.A. Hart (Eds.) New York: Oxford University Press.
    4. Bringsjord, S. (2010). Meeting Floridi鈥檚 challenge to artificial intelligence from the knowledge-game test for self-consciousness. / Metaphilosophy, 41, 292鈥?12. CrossRef
    5. Bryson, J. (2010). Robots should be slaves. In Y. Wilks (Ed.), / Close engagements with artificial companions: key social, psychological, ethical and design issues. USA: John Benjamins.
    6. Code, L. (1991). / Is the sex of the knower epistemologically significant? In: What can she know?: Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge (pp. 1鈥?6). Ithaca, USA: Cornell University Press.
    7. Floridi, L. (2005). Consciousness, agents and the knowledge game. / Minds and Machines, 15, 415鈥?44. CrossRef
    8. Gorbenko, A., Popov, V., & Sheka, A. (2012). Robot self awareness: exploration of internal states. / Applied Mathematical Sciences, 6, 675鈥?88.
    9. Gunkel, D. J. (2012). A Vindication of the Rights of Machines. In D. J. Gunkel, J. J. Bryson, and S. Torrance (Eds.), / Proceedings of the AISB/IACAP World Congress 2012: The Machine Question: AI, Ethics and Moral Responsibility. Birmingham, England.
    10. Kant, I. (1996). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. In M. Gregor (Ed.), / Practical philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    11. Legg, S. & Hutter, M. (2006a). A collection of definitions of intelligence. In: Goertzel, B. (Ed.), / Proc. / 1st Annual Artificial General Intelligence Workshop.
    12. Legg, S. & Hutter, M. (2006b). A formal measure of machine intelligence. In / Proc. / Annual Machine Learning Conference of Belgium and The Netherlands. Ghent, Belgium.
    13. Legg, S., & Hutter, M. (2007). Universal intelligence: a definition of machine intelligence. / Minds and Machines, 17, 391鈥?44. CrossRef
    14. Long, L. N., & Kelley, T. D. (2010). Review of consciousness and the possibility of conscious robots. / Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information, and Communication, 7, 68鈥?4. CrossRef
    15. Mill, J. S. (1993). / On liberty and utilitarianism. NY, USA: Bantam.
    16. Mills, C. (1999). / The racial contract. Ithaca, USA: Cornell University Press.
    17. National Institute of Health. (2013). Council of Councils Working Group on the Use of Chimpanzees in NIH-Supported Research Report. http://dpcpsi.nih.gov/council/pdf/FNL_Report_WG_Chimpanzees.pdf. Accessed: 6 March 2013.
    18. O'Regan, J. K. (2012). How to build a robot that is conscious and feels. / Minds and Machines, 22, 117鈥?36. CrossRef
    19. Piot-Ziegler, C., et al. (2010). Mastectomy, body deconstruction, and impact on identity: a qualitative study. / British Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 479鈥?10. CrossRef
    20. Ruffo, M. (2012). The robot, a stranger to ethics. In D. J. Gunkel, J. J. Bryson, and S. Torrance (Eds.), / Proceedings of the AISB/IACAP World Congress 2012: The Machine Question: AI, Ethics and Moral Responsibility. Birmingham, England.
    21. Scruton, R. (2006). / Animal rights and wrongs. London, UK: Continuum.
    22. Singer, P. (2002). / Animal liberation. USA: ECCO.
    23. Sparrow, R. (2004). The Turing Triage test. / Ethics and Information Technology, 6, 203鈥?13. CrossRef
    24. Sparrow, R. (2012). Can machines be people? In P. Lin, K. Abney, & G. A. Bekey (Eds.), / Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
    25. Taylor, A. (1996). Nasty, brutish, and short: the illiberal intuition that animals don鈥檛 count. / The Journal of Value Inquiry, 30, 265鈥?77. CrossRef
    26. Torrance, S. (2012). The centrality of machine consciousness to machine ethics: Between realism and socialrelationism. In D. J. Gunkel, J. J. Bryson, and S. Torrance (Eds.), / Proceedings of the AISB/IACAP World Congress 2012: The Machine Question: AI, Ethics and Moral Responsibility. Birmingham, England.
    27. United Nations. (1948). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/. Accessed: 3 Jan 2013.
    28. Wallach, W., & Allen, C. (2009). / Moral machines: teaching robots right from wrong. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
    29. Warren, M. A. (1973). On the moral and legal status of abortion. / The Monist, 57, 43鈥?1. CrossRef
    30. Warwick, K. (2012). Robots with biological brains. In P. Lin, K. Abney, & G. A. Bekey (Eds.), / Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
    31. Zack, N. (2002). / The philosophy of science and race. New York, USA: Routledge.
  • 作者单位:Erica L. Neely (1)

    1. Department of Philosophy and Religion, Ohio Northern University, Ada, OH, 45810, USA
  • ISSN:2210-5441
文摘
A key distinction in ethics is between members and nonmembers of the moral community. Over time, our notion of this community has expanded as we have moved from a rationality criterion to a sentience criterion for membership. I argue that a sentience criterion is insufficient to accommodate all members of the moral community; the true underlying criterion can be understood in terms of whether a being has interests. This may be extended to conscious, self-aware machines, as well as to any autonomous intelligent machines. Such machines exhibit an ability to formulate desires for the course of their own existence; this gives them basic moral standing. While not all machines display autonomy, those which do must be treated as moral patients; to ignore their claims to moral recognition is to repeat past errors. I thus urge moral generosity with respect to the ethical claims of intelligent machines.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700