Treatment cost evaluation of extrauterine gravidity: a literature review of medical and surgical treatment costs
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Florian Ebner ; Dominic Varga ; Friederike Sorg…
- 关键词：Extrauterine ; Tubal ; Pregnancy ; Medical ; Surgical
- 刊名：Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
- 出版年：2015
- 出版时间：March 2015
- 年：2015
- 卷：291
- 期：3
- 页码：493-498
- 全文大小：335 KB
- 参考文献：1. Agarwal N, Shahid A, Odejinmi F (2013) Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP): a rare case of complete scar dehiscence due to scar ectopic pregnancy and its management-Springer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288:231-32. doi:10.1007/s00404-012-2696-5 CrossRef
2. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gyn?kologie, und Geburtshilfe A für, Ultraschalldiagnostik (ARGUS) D et al. (2001) Leitlinie 015-32 Ultraschalluntersuchung in der Fruehschwangerschaft. Frauenarzt 327 ff
3. Van Mello NM, Mol F, Ankum WM et al (2012) Ectopic pregnancy: how the diagnostic and therapeutic management has changed. Fertil Steril 98:1066-073. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.040 CrossRef
4. Lermann J, Segl P, Jud S et al (2014) Low-dose methotrexate treatment in ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective analysis of 164 ectopic pregnancies treated between 2000 and 2008-Springer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:329-35. doi:10.1007/s00404-013-2982-x CrossRef
5. Hajenius PJ, Mol F, Mol BWJ et al (2007) Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD000324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000324.pub2
6. Mol F, Mol BW, Ankum WM et al (2008) Current evidence on surgery, systemic methotrexate and expectant management in the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 14:309-19. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmn012 CrossRef
7. Lécuru F, Robin F, Taurelle R (1997) Cost of the treatment of unruptured ectopic pregnancy: is there still a place for laparotomy? Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:1275-276 CrossRef
8. Mol BW, Hajenius PJ, Ankum WM et al (1997) Comparative costs of methotrexate and laparoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod 12:1603-604 CrossRef
9. Foulk RA, Steiger RM (1996) Operative management of ectopic pregnancy: a cost analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:90-6 CrossRef
10. Lowe PJ, Mamers PM, Sturrock TV, Healy D (1998) A casemix cost comparison of 2 treatments for ectopic pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 38:333-35 CrossRef
11. Xiang XD, Tang YQ, Mao JF (1999) A comparison of laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Singapore Med J 40:88-0
12. Mol BW, Hajenius PJ, Engelsbel S et al (1997) An economic evaluation of laparoscopy and open surgery in the treatment of tubal pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76:596-00 CrossRef
13. Ailawadi M, Lorch SA, Barnhart KT (2005) Cost-effectiveness of presumptively medically treating women at risk for ectopic pregnancy compared with first performing a dilatation and curettage. Fertil Steril 83:376-82. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.068 CrossRef
14. Morlock RJ, Lafata JE, Eisenstein D (2000) Cost-effectiveness of single-dose methotrexate compared with laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 95:407-12 CrossRef
15. Barnhart KT, Gosman G, Ashby R, Sammel M (2003) The medical management of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis comparing “single dose-and “multidose-regimens. Obstet Gynecol 101:778-84 CrossRef
16. Seror V, Gelfucci F, Gerbaud L et al (2007) Care pathways for ectopic pregnancy: a population-based cost-effectiveness analysis. Fertil Steril 87:737-48. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.005
文摘
Background The diagnosis of extrauterine pregnancy is possible very early giving the patient and doctors treatment options. As the risks and success rate of medical and surgical treatment are similar, the decision is increasingly influenced by cost-effectiveness. Objective The following article systematically reviews the known literature regarding cost, decision criteria and possible follow-up. Methods Literature review of extrauterine gravity in combination with cost in the online National Library of Medicine since 1.1.1997 following the PRISMA recommendations. Results Six articles were identified in which the cost of the laparoscopic versus medical treatment is reviewed. In five articles, the medical treatment was shown to be more cost effective and in the sixth article the costs were found to be equal. The cost saving varies between 18 and 88?% depending on the consideration of direct and indirect costs. If indirect expenses are considered, the total sum increases with treatment failures. Failure rates are given as up to 27?% depending on the type of failure (surgical or medical). These rates seem to be linked indirectly with the β-HCG levels. Predictive parameters for the successful medical treatment are missing. Conclusions The treatment of small extrauterine gravidities in haemodynamically stable patients (defined by HCG levels 5,000?IU/l favour the surgical treatment as being more cost-effective. A similar cut-off for the sonographic imaging is missing.