用户名: 密码: 验证码:
Hepatobiliary agents and their role in LI-RADS
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Thomas A. Hope (1)
    Kathryn J. Fowler (2)
    Claude B. Sirlin (3)
    Eduardo A. C. Costa (3)
    Judy Yee (1)
    Benjamin M. Yeh (1)
    Jay P. Heiken (2)

    1. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging
    ; University of California San Francisco ; 505 Parnassus Avenue 鈥?0628 ; San Francisco ; CA ; 94143-0628 ; USA
    2. Department of Radiology
    ; Washington University School of Medicine ; St. Louis ; MO ; USA
    3. Liver Imaging Group
    ; Department of Radiology ; University of California San Diego ; San Diego ; CA ; USA
  • 关键词:Hepatocellular carcinoma ; Hepatobiliary agents ; Liver ; LI ; RADS ; Gadoxetate ; Gadobenate dimeglumine
  • 刊名:Abdominal Imaging
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:March 2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:40
  • 期:3
  • 页码:613-625
  • 全文大小:2,151 KB
  • 参考文献:1. American College of Radiology (2013) / Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS). American College of Radiology, Washington, DC. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/LIRADS. Accessed 25 May 2014
    2. Bashir MR, Breault SR, Braun R, Do RK, et al. (2014) Optimal timing and diagnostic adequacy of hepatocyte phase imaging with gadoxetate-enhanced liver MRI. Acad Radiol 21(6):726鈥?32 CrossRef
    3. Tajima T, Takao H, Akai H, Kiryu S, et al. (2010) Relationship between liver function and liver signal intensity in hepatobiliary phase of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34(3):362鈥?66 CrossRef
    4. Tamada T, Ito K, Higaki A, Yoshida K, et al. (2011) Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: evaluation of hepatic enhancement effects in normal and cirrhotic livers. Eur J Radiol 80(3):e311鈥揺316 CrossRef
    5. Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sou H, Sano K, et al. (2009) Liver parenchymal enhancement of hepatocyte-phase images in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: which biological markers of the liver function affect the enhancement? J Magn Reson Imaging 30(5):1042鈥?046 CrossRef
    6. Lee NK, Kim S, Kim GH, Heo J, et al. (2012) Significance of the 鈥渄elayed hyperintense portal vein sign鈥?in the hepatobiliary phase MRI obtained with Gd-EOB-DTPA. J Magn Reson Imaging 36(3):678鈥?85 CrossRef
    7. Kim JY, Lee SS, Byun JH, Kim SY, et al. (2013) Biologic factors affecting HCC conspicuity in hepatobiliary phase imaging with liver-specific contrast agents. Am J Roentgenol 201(2):322鈥?31 CrossRef
    8. Kim H, Kim M-J, Park M-S, Cha S-W, et al. (2010) Potential conditions causing impairment of selective hepatobiliary enhancement of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced delayed magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34(1):113鈥?20 CrossRef
    9. Chernyak V, Kim J, Rozenblit AM, Mazzoriol F, et al. (2011) Hepatic enhancement during the hepatobiliary phase after gadoxetate disodium administration in patients with chronic liver disease: the role of laboratory factors. J Magn Reson Imaging 34(2):301鈥?09 CrossRef
    10. Wald C, Russo MW, Heimbach JK, Hussain HK, et al. (2013) New OPTN/UNOS policy for liver transplant allocation: standardization of liver imaging, diagnosis, classification, and reporting of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 266(2):376鈥?82 CrossRef
    11. Mori K, Yoshioka H, Takahashi N, Yamaguchi M, et al. (2005) Triple arterial phase dynamic MRI with sensitivity encoding for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of the diagnostic accuracy among the early, middle, late, and whole triple arterial phase imaging. Am J Roentgenol 184(1):63鈥?9 CrossRef
    12. Hope TA, Saranathan M, Petkovska I, Hargreaves BA, et al. (2013) Improvement of gadoxetate arterial phase capture with a high spatio-temporal resolution multiphase three-dimensional SPGR-dixon sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:938鈥?45 CrossRef
    13. Zech CJ, Vos B, Nordell A, Urich M, et al. (2009) Vascular enhancement in early dynamic liver MR imaging in an animal model: comparison of two injection regimen and two different doses Gd-EOB-DTPA (gadoxetic acid) with standard Gd-DTPA. Invest Radiol 44(6):305鈥?10 CrossRef
    14. Tamada T, Ito K, Yoshida K, Kanki A, et al. (2011) Comparison of three different injection methods for arterial phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR imaging of the liver. Eur J Radiol 80(3):e284鈥揺288 CrossRef
    15. Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sano K, Sou H, et al. (2011) Double-dose gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with chronic liver disease. Invest Radiol 46(2):141鈥?45 CrossRef
    16. Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sou H, Sano K, et al. (2009) Dilution method of gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J Magn Reson Imaging 30(4):849鈥?54 CrossRef
    17. Davenport MS, Viglianti BL, Al-Hawary MM, Caoili EM, et al. (2013) Comparison of acute transient dyspnea after intravenous administration of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine: effect on arterial phase image quality. Radiology 266(2):452鈥?61 CrossRef
    18. Doo KW, Lee CH, Choi JW, Lee J, et al. (2009) 鈥淧seudo washout鈥?sign in high-flow hepatic hemangioma on gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced MRI mimicking hypervascular tumor. Am J Roentgenol 193(6):W490鈥揥496 CrossRef
    19. Nakamura Y, Toyota N, Date S, Oda S, et al. (2011) Clinical significance of the transitional phase at gadoxetate disodium-enhanced hepatic MRI for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: preliminary results. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35(6):723鈥?27 CrossRef
    20. Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sano K, Sou H, et al. (2011) Outcome of hypovascular hepatic nodules revealing no gadoxetic acid uptake in patients with chronic liver disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 34(1):88鈥?4 CrossRef
    21. Kumada T, Toyoda H, Tada T, Sone Y, et al. (2011) Evolution of hypointense hepatocellular nodules observed only in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI. Am J Roentgenol 197(1):58鈥?3 CrossRef
    22. Suh YJ, Kim M-J, Choi J-Y, Park YN, et al. (2011) Differentiation of hepatic hyperintense lesions seen on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MRI. Am J Roentgenol 197(1):W44鈥揥52 CrossRef
    23. Park Y, Kim SH, Kim SH, Jeon YH, et al. (2010) Gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI versus gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA)-enhanced MRI for preoperatively detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: an initial experience. Korean J Radiol 11(4):433鈥?40 CrossRef
    24. UNOS (2013) / OPTN policy 3.6: allocation of livers. UNOS. http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/PoliciesandBylaws2/policies/pdfs/policy_8.pdf. Accessed May 25 2014.
    25. Gupta RT, Marin D, Boll DT, Husarik DB, et al. (2012) Hepatic hemangiomas: difference in enhancement pattern on 3T MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadoxetate disodium. Eur J Radiol 81(10):2457鈥?462 CrossRef
    26. Tamada T, Ito K, Yamamoto A, Sone T, et al. (2011) Hepatic hemangiomas: evaluation of enhancement patterns at dynamic MRI with gadoxetate disodium. Am J Roentgenol 196(4):824鈥?30 CrossRef
    27. P茅port茅 ARJ, Sommer WH, Nikolaou K, Reiser MF, et al. (2013) Imaging features of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Eur J Radiol 82(3):e101鈥揺106 CrossRef
    28. Kang Y, Lee JM, Kim SH, Han JK, et al. (2012) Intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma: enhancement patterns on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images. Radiology 264(3):751鈥?60 CrossRef
    29. Kogita S, Imai Y, Okada M, Kim T, et al. (2010) Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance images of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histological grading and portal blood flow. Eur Radiol 20(10):2405鈥?413 CrossRef
    30. Sano K, Ichikawa T, Motosugi U, Sou H, et al. (2011) Imaging study of early hepatocellular carcinoma: usefulness of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 261(3):834鈥?44 CrossRef
    31. Yeom SK, Byun JH, Kim HJ, Park SH, et al. (2013) Focal fat deposition at liver MRI with gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetic acid: quantitative and qualitative analysis. Magn Reson Imaging 31(6):911鈥?17 CrossRef
    32. Husarik DB, Gupta RT, Ringe KI, Boll DT, et al. (2011) Contrast enhanced liver MRI in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: inverse appearance of focal confluent fibrosis on delayed phase MR images with hepatocyte specific versus extracellular gadolinium based contrast agents. Acad Radiol 18(12):1549鈥?554 CrossRef
    33. Park YS, Lee CH, Kim BH, Lee J, et al. (2013) Using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 3-T MRI for the differentiation of infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma and focal confluent fibrosis in liver cirrhosis. Magn Reson Imaging 31(7):1137鈥?142 CrossRef
    34. Sun H, Lee J, Shin C, Lee D, et al. (2010) Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating small hepatocellular carcinomas. Invest Radiol 45(2):96鈥?03 CrossRef
  • 刊物类别:Medicine
  • 刊物主题:Medicine & Public Health
    Imaging and Radiology
    Gastroenterology
    Hepatology
  • 出版者:Springer New York
  • ISSN:1432-0509
文摘
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) was introduced with the goal of standardizing the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. The 2014 version of LI-RADS incorporates the use of hepatobiliary contrast agents (HBAs) into the diagnostic algorithm, including gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine. Three new ancillary features are introduced: hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity and HBP hypointense rim favor malignancy, while HBP isointensity favors benignity. HBP hyperintensity favors neither malignancy nor benignity. In this review, we describe how to use these new features as well as numerous pitfalls associated with the use ofHBAs, including hemangiomas, cholangiocarcinomas, and focal confluent fibrosis. Importantly, findings on the HBP are not included as major criteria and therefore the criteria for the diagnosis of LI-RADS 5 observations remain unchanged, and so congruence with the Organ Procurement Transplant Network system remains intact. Additionally, we review how the major features in LI-RADS, arterial phase hyperenhancement, threshold growth, and washout and capsule appearance, may be affected with HBAs. Notably with HBAs, hypointensity on the delayed phase, termed the transitional phase, does not qualify as washout appearance due to the possibility of early parenchymal enhancement. It is hoped that the incorporation of HBAs into LI-RADS will help create consistency when interpreting HBA enhanced MRIs.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700