Myokardiale Perfusionsdiagnostik der koronaren Herzerkrankung

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Dr. A. Hamdan ; C. Rischpler ; F. Hyafil
• 关键词：Magnetresonanztomographie ; Computertomographie ; Positronenemissionstomographie ; Hybridverfahren ; Isch盲mie ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Computed tomography ; Positron emission tomography ; Hybrid procedures ; Ischemia
• 刊名：Der Kardiologe
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：December 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：9
• 期：6
• 页码：421-433
• 全文大小：5,222 KB
• 参考文献：1.Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F et al (2014) ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 35:2541鈥?619CrossRef PubMed
  2.Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I, Hettwer S et al (2003) Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation 108:432鈥?37CrossRef PubMed
  3.Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W et al (1999) Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation 99:763鈥?70CrossRef PubMed
  4.Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF et al (2007) Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1343鈥?353CrossRef PubMed
  5.Schwitter J, Wacker CM, van Rossum AC et al (2008) MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multivendor, randomized trial. Eur Heart J 29:480鈥?89CrossRef PubMed
  6.Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF et al (2012) Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet 379:453鈥?60PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  7.Ebersberger U, Makowski MR, Schoepf UJ et al (2013) Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 14:1174鈥?180CrossRef PubMed
  8.Manka R, Wissmann L, Gebker R et al (2015) Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 8(5): (pii: e003061.)CrossRef
  9.Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Picard MH et al (2014) Comparative definitions for moderate-severe ischemia in stress nuclear, echocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 7:593鈥?04PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  10.Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R et al (2007) Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stress wall motion imaging. Circulation 115:1769鈥?776CrossRef PubMed
  11.Bingham SE, Hachamovitch R (2011) Incremental prognostic significance of combined cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, adenosine stress perfusion, delayed enhancement, and left ventricular function over preimaging information for the prediction of adverse events. Circulation 123:1509鈥?518CrossRef PubMed
  12.Sozzi FB, Iacuzio L, Civaia F et al (2015) Incremental value of normal adenosine perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance: Long-term outcome. Am Heart J 169:841鈥?46CrossRef PubMed
  13.Kelle S, Chiribiri A, Vierecke J et al (2011) Long-term prognostic value of dobutamine stress CMR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:161鈥?72CrossRef PubMed
  14.Mahrholdt H (2005) Delayed enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J 26:1461鈥?474CrossRef PubMed
  15.Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A et al (2000) (2000) The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med 343:1445鈥?453CrossRef PubMed
  16.Wellnhofer E, Olariu A, Klein C et al (2004) Magnetic resonance low-dose dobutamine test is superior to SCAR quantification for the prediction of functional recovery. Circulation 109:2172鈥?174CrossRef PubMed
  17.Rischpler C, Langwieser N, Souvatzoglou M et al (2015) PET/MRI early after myocardial infarction: evaluation of viability with late gadolinium enhancement transmurality vs. 18F-FDG uptake. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:661鈥?69PubMed
  18.K眉hl HP, Lipke CS, Krombach GA et al (2006) Assessment of reversible myocardial dysfunction in chronic ischaemic heart disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance and a combined positron emission tomography-single photon emission computed tomography imaging protocol. Eur Heart J 27:846鈥?53CrossRef PubMed
  19.Hamdan A, Asbach P, Wellnhofer E et al (2011) A prospective study for comparison of MR and CT imaging for detection of coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:50鈥?1CrossRef PubMed
  20.Younis LT, Byers S, Shaw L et al (1989) Prognostic importance of silent myocardial ischemia detected by intravenous dipyridamole thallium myocardial imaging in asymptomatic patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 14:1635鈥?641CrossRef PubMed
  21.Iskander S, Iskandrian AE (1998) Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:57鈥?2CrossRef PubMed
  22.Nowak B (2004) Nuklearkardiologische Methoden zur Prognosebeurteilung und Risikostratifizierung bei Koronarer Herzkrankheit. Nuklearmediziner 27:176鈥?85CrossRef
  23.Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ et al (2008) Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy. Circulation 117:1283鈥?291CrossRef PubMed
  24.Sharir T, Germano G, Kavanagh PB et al (1999) Incremental prognostic value of post-stress left ventricular ejection fraction and volume by gated myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 100:1035鈥?042CrossRef PubMed
  25.Underwood SR, Bax JJ, vom Dahl J et al (2004) Imaging techniques for the assessment of myocardial hibernation. report of a study group of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 25:815鈥?36CrossRef PubMed
  26.Sch盲fers M, Matheja P, Hasfeld M et al (1996) The clinical impact of thallium-201 reinjection for the detection of myocardial hibernation. Eur J Nucl Med 23:407鈥?13CrossRef PubMed
  27.Batista JF, Pereztol O, Valdes JA et al (1999) Improved detection of myocardial perfusion reversibility by rest-nitroglycerin tc-99m-MIBI: comparison with TI-201 reinjection. J Nucl Cardiol 6:480鈥?86CrossRef PubMed
  28.Vom DJ, Altehoefer C, Sheehan FH et al (1996) Recovery of regional left ventricular dysfunction after coronary revascularization. Impact of myocardial viability assessed by nuclear imaging and vessel patency at follow-up angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 28:948鈥?58CrossRef
  29.Underwood SR, de Bondt P, Flotats A et al (2014) The current and future status of nuclear cardiology: a consensus report. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 15:949鈥?55CrossRef PubMed
  30.Ben-Haim S, Murthy VL, Breault C et al (2013) Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve using dynamic SPECT imaging in humans: a feasibility study. J Nucl Med 54(6):873鈥?79PubMedCentral CrossRef PubMed
  31.Rimoldi OE, Camici PG (2004) Positron emission tomography for quantitation of myocardial perfusion. J Nucl Cardiol 11:482鈥?90CrossRef PubMed
  32.Kaufmann PA, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, Yap JT et al (1999) Assessment of the reproducibility of baseline and hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurements with 15O-labeled water and PET. J Nucl Med 40:1848鈥?856PubMed
  33.Nekolla S, Schlieringer S, Stadler E et al (1996) World wide web and virtual reality markup language extensions in cardiac SPECT and PET data processing. J Nucl Med 37:172P
  34.DiCarli M, Czernin J, Hoh CK et al (1995) Relation among stenosis severity, myocardial blood flow, and flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 91:1944鈥?951CrossRef
  35.Schoen H, Schelbert HR, Najafi A et al (1982) C-11 labeled palmitic acid for the noninvasive evaluation of regional myocardial fatty acid metabolism with positron computed tomography: II Kinetics of C-11 palmitic acid in acutely ischemic myocardium. Am Heart J 1103:548鈥?61CrossRef
  36.vom Dahl J, Eitzman DT, al-Aouar AR et al (1994) Relation of regional function, perfusion, and metabolism in patients withadvanced coronary artery disease undergoing surgical revascularization. Circulation 90:2356鈥?366CrossRef
  37.Tamaki N, Yonekura Y, Yamashita K et al (1993) Prognostic value of an increase in Fluorine-18 Deoxyglucose uptake in patients with myocardial infarction. Comparison with stress thallium imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:16721鈥?1627CrossRef
  38.Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiogr aphy: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2135鈥?144CrossRef PubMed
  39.Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359:2324鈥?336CrossRef PubMed
  40.Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum MA et al (2010) Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest Radiol 45:306鈥?13CrossRef PubMed
  41.Rochitte CE, George RT, Chen MY et al (2014) Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by single photon emission computed tomography: the CORE320 study 35, S 1120鈥?130
  42.Yao SS, Supariwala A, Yao A et al (2015) Prognostic value of stress echocardiography in patients with low-intermediate or high short-term (10 years) versus low. Am J Cardiol 116(5):9鈥?25
  43.Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W et al (1999) Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation 99:763鈥?70CrossRef PubMed
  44.Kaul S (1997) Myocardial contrast echocardiography, 15 years of research and development. Circulation 96:3745鈥?760CrossRef PubMed
  45.Rovai D, Lubrano V, Vassalle C et al (1998) Detection of perfusion defects during coronary occlusion and myocardial reperfusion after thrombolysis by intravenous administration of the echo-enhancing agent BR1. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 11:169鈥?80CrossRef PubMed
  46.Leistad E, Ohmori K, Peterson TA et al (2001) Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion during graded coronary artery stenoses by intravenous myocardial contrast. echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:624鈥?31CrossRef PubMed
  47.Rezkall SH, Kloner RA (2002) No-reflow phenomen. Circulation 105:656鈥?62CrossRef
  48.Porter TR, Xie F, Silver M, Kricsfeld D et al (2001) Real-time perfusion imaging with low mechanical index pulse inversion Doppler imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:748鈥?53CrossRef PubMed
  49.Shimoni S, Zoghbi WA, Xie F et al (2001) Real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion during bicycle and treadmill exercise echocardiography: Comparison with single photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:741鈥?47CrossRef PubMed
  50.Gaibazzi N, Rigo F, Lorenzoni V et al (2013) Comparative prediction of cardiac events by wall motion, wall motion plus coronary flow reserve, or myocardial perfusion analysis: a multicenter study of contrast stress echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:1鈥?2CrossRef PubMed
  51.Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M et al (2010) Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation 122:603鈥?13CrossRef PubMed
  52.Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou RN, Ghadri JR et al (2011) Prognostic value of cardiac hybrid imaging integrating single-photon emission computed tomography with coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur Heart J 32:1465鈥?471CrossRef PubMed
  
• 作者单位：Dr. A. Hamdan (1) (2)
  C. Rischpler (2)
  F. Hyafil (2)
  
  1. Rabin Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
  2. Nuklearmedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Technische Universit盲t M眉nchen, Ismaninger Stra脽e 22, 81675, M眉nchen, Deutschland
  
• 刊物主题：Internal Medicine; Cardiology; Pneumology/Respiratory System; Intensive / Critical Care Medicine; Emergency Medicine;
• 出版者：Springer Berlin Heidelberg
• ISSN：1864-9726

文摘

The technological progress in the last decades has produced a multitude of non-invasive imaging procedures for the diagnostics of coronary heart disease. The high diagnostic accuracy and the prognostic power of perfusion measurements with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and positron emission tomography (PET) have been confirmed in many single center and multicenter studies. This is the reason why these procedures are recommended in the European guidelines for patients with an intermediate screening test probability for coronary heart disease. In contrast, perfusion measurements with CT should not be used in routine clinical diagnostics due to methodological aspects and a lack of empirical values. Ischemia diagnostics with hybrid procedures nowadays only have a limited use in special centers for the diagnosis of coronary heart disease. Keywords Magnetic resonance imaging Computed tomography Positron emission tomography Hybrid procedures Ischemia