Genetic structure and variability of the working dog inferred from microsatellite marker analysis
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Yun-Jeong Kwon (1)
Bong-Hwan Choi (2)
Jungwoo Eo (1)
Choongrak Kim (3)
Yi-Deun Jung (1)
Ja-Rang Lee (1)
Yuri Choi (1)
Jeong-An Gim (1)
Dong-Hoon Lee (4)
Ji-Hong Ha (4) (5)
Dae-Soo Kim (6)
Jae-Won Huh (7)
Tae-Hun Kim (2)
Hwan-Hoo Seong (2)
Heui-Soo Kim (1) - 关键词：Allele ; Genetic variability ; Microsatellite ; Working dogs
- 刊名：Genes & Genomics
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：April 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：36
- 期：2
- 页码：197-203
- 全文大小：416 KB
- 参考文献：1. Breen M, Jouquand S, Renier C, Mellersh CS, Hitte C, Holmes NG, Cheron A, Suter N, Vignaux F, Bristow AE et al (2001) Chromosome-specific single-locus FISH probes allow anchorage of an 1800-marker integrated radiation-hybrid/linkage map of the domestic dog genome to all chromosomes. Genome Res 11:1784鈥?795 CrossRef
2. Brinkmann B, Klintschar M, Neuhuber F, Hohne J, Rolf B (1998) Mutation rate in human microsatellites: influence of the structure and length of the tandem repeat. Am J Hum Genet 62:1408鈥?415 CrossRef
3. Brunner HG, Nelen M, Breakefield XO, Ropers HH, Van OBA (1993) Abnormal behavior associated with a point mutation in the structural gene for monoamine oxidase A. Science 262:578鈥?80 CrossRef
4. Chen HY, Huang W, Leung VHK, Fung SLM, Ma SL, Jiang H (1002) Tang NLS (2013) Functional interaction between SNPs and microsatellite in the transcriptional regulation of insulin-like growth factor 1. Hum Mutat 34(9):1289鈥?297. doi:10.1002/humu.22363 CrossRef
5. Cushman-Vokoun AM, Stover DG, Shao S, Koehler EA, Berlin JD, Vnencak-Jones CL (2013) Clinical utility of KRAS and BRAF mutations in a cohort of patients with colorectal neoplasms submitted for microsatellite instability testing. Clin Colorectal Cancer doi. doi:10.1016/j.clcc.2013.04.005
6. Ellegren H (2004) Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat Rev Genet 5:435鈥?45 CrossRef
7. Fredholm M, Wintero AK (1995) Variation of short tandem repeats within and between species belonging to the Canidae family. Mamm Genome 6:11鈥?8 CrossRef
8. Goudet J (2012) FSTAT: a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3.2). http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm. Accessed 20 June 2012
9. Guyon R, Lorentzen TE, Hitte C, Kim L, Cadieu E, Parker HG, Quignon P, Lowe JK, Renier C, Gelfenbeyn B et al (2003) A 1-Mb resolution radiation hybrid map of the canine genome. PNAS 9:5296鈥?301 CrossRef
10. Hong Y, Kim KS, Lee H, Min MS (2013) Population genetic study of the raccoon dog ( / Nyctereutes procyonoides) in south Korea using newly developed 12 microsatellite markers. Genes Genet Syst 88:69鈥?6 CrossRef
11. Inoue-Murayama M (2009) Genetic polymorphism as a background of animal behavior. Anim Sci J 80:113鈥?20 CrossRef
12. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099鈥?106 CrossRef
13. Kang BT, Kim KS, Min MS, Chae YJ, Kang JW, Yoon J, Chol J, Seong JK, Park HC, An J et al (2009) Microsatellite loci analysis for the genetic variability and the parentage test of five dog breeds in south Korea. Genes Genet Syst 84:245鈥?51 CrossRef
14. Kim KS, Tanabe Y, Park CK, Ha JH (2001) Genetic variability in East Asian dogs using microsatellite loci analysis. J Hered 92:398鈥?03 CrossRef
15. Klukowska J, Szczerbal I, Wengi-Piasecka A, Switonski M, Schelling C, Gmur A, Dolf G (2004) Identification of two polymorphic microsatellites in a canine BAC clone harbouring a putative canine MAOA gene. Anim Genet 35:75鈥?6 CrossRef
16. Konno A, Inoue-Murayama M, Hasegawa T (2011) Androgen receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with aggression in Japanese Akita Inu. Biol Lett 7:658鈥?60 CrossRef
17. Leberg PL (2002) Estimating allelic richness: effects of sample size and bottlenecks. Mol Ecol 11:2445鈥?449 CrossRef
18. Litt M, Luty JA (1989) A hypervariable microsatellite revealed by in vitro amplification of a dinucleotide repeat within the cardiac muscle actin gene. Am J Hum Genet 44:397鈥?01
19. Parsons KM, Durban JW, Burdin AM, Burkanov VN, Pitman RL, Barlow J, Barrett-Lennard LG, Leduc RG, Robertson KM, Matkin CO et al (2013) Geographic patterns of genetic differentiation among killer whales in the Northern North Pacific. J Hered doi. doi:10.1093/jhered/est037
20. Rousset F (2008) genepop鈥?07: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103鈥?06
21. Sargan DR, Aguirre-Hernandez J, Galibert F, Ostrander EA (2007) An extended microsatellite set for linkage mapping in the domestic dog. J Hered 98:221鈥?31 CrossRef
22. Spady TC, Ostrander EA (2008) Canine behavioral genetics: pointing out the phenotypes and herding up the genes. Am J Hum Genet 82:10鈥?8 CrossRef
23. Spampinate C, Leonardi D (2013) Molecular fingerprints to identify candida species. Biomed Res Int doi 10:1155
24. Takeuchi Y, Mori Y (2006) A comparison of the behavioral profiles of purebred dogs in Japan to profiles of those in the united states and the United Kingdom. J Vet Med Sci 68:789鈥?96 CrossRef
25. Takeuchi Y, Hashizume C, Chon EM, Momozawa Y, Masuda K, Kikusui T, Mori Y (2005) Canine tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) gene and dopamine beta-hydroxylase (DBH) gene: their sequences, genetic polymorphisms, and diversities among five different dog breeds. J Vet Med Sci 67:861鈥?67 CrossRef
26. Takeuchi Y, Hashizume C, Arata S, Inoue-Murayama M, Maki T, Hart BL, Mori Y (2009a) An approach to canine behavioural genetics employing guide dogs for the blind. Anim Genet 40:217鈥?24 CrossRef
27. Takeuchi Y, Kaneko F, Hashizume C, Masuda K, Ogata N, Maki T, Inoue-Murayama M, Hart BL, Mori Y (2009b) Association analysis between canine behavioural traits and genetic polymorphisms in the Shiba Inu breed. Anim Genet 40:616鈥?22 CrossRef
28. Zheng Y, Huo D, Zhang J, Yoshimatsu TF, Niu Q, Olopade OI (2012) Microsatellites in the estrogen receptor (ESR1, ESR2) and androgen receptor (AR) genes and breast cancer risk in African American and Nigerian women. PLoS One 7:e40494 - 作者单位：Yun-Jeong Kwon (1)
Bong-Hwan Choi (2)
Jungwoo Eo (1)
Choongrak Kim (3)
Yi-Deun Jung (1)
Ja-Rang Lee (1)
Yuri Choi (1)
Jeong-An Gim (1)
Dong-Hoon Lee (4)
Ji-Hong Ha (4) (5)
Dae-Soo Kim (6)
Jae-Won Huh (7)
Tae-Hun Kim (2)
Hwan-Hoo Seong (2)
Heui-Soo Kim (1)
1. Department of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Pusan National University, Busan, 609-735, Republic of Korea
2. Division of Animal Genomics & Bioinformatics, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Suwon, 441-706, Republic of Korea
3. Department of Statistics, College of Natural Sciences, Pusan National University, Busan, 609-735, Republic of Korea
4. Sapsaree Breeding Research Institute, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, 712-844, Republic of Korea
5. School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University, Taegu, 702-701, Republic of Korea
6. Genome Resource Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), 111 Gwahangno, Yuseong-gu, Taejon, 305-806, Republic of Korea
7. National Primate Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB),, Ochang, Chungbuk, 363-883, Republic of Korea - ISSN：2092-9293
文摘
Working dogs serve as military watch dogs, search dogs, rescue dogs, and guide dogs with un-come-at-able character. They are drafted by in-training examination including concentration, capacity for locomotion, boldness and earthly desires. In this study, genetic diversity and relationships among two groups of working dogs (pass and fail group in-training examination) were assessed based on 15 microsatellite markers in 25 individuals of working dogs (military watch dogs and Korean search dogs). For the 15 microsatellite markers, the values of allelic richness (A R ) ranged from 2.21 (pass group) to 1.60 (fail group) in military watch dogs, while A R ranged from 2.79 (pass group) to 2.72 (fail group) in Korean search dogs. Among 52 different alleles of military watch dogs, 22 alleles were detected in pass group only, while 8 alleles in fail group only. In case of Korean search dogs, 3 alleles were observed in pass group only, while 13 alleles in fail group only. These group-specific unique alleles reflect good biomarker for selecting working dogs (military watch dogs and Korean search dogs), indicating that those group specific microsatellite alleles could separate working dogs to be pass or fail group in out-training dog population. Taken together, this study demonstrates the feasibility of microsatellite analyses for the selection of superior working dogs objectively. Furthermore, this approach could be used for the proper selection of working dogs in combination with in-training examination.