A robotic object hitting task to quantify sensorimotor impairments in participants with stroke

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Kathrin Tyryshkin (1)
  Angela M Coderre (2)
  Janice I Glasgow (1)
  Troy M Herter (3)
  Stephen D Bagg (2) (4)
  Sean P Dukelow (5)
  Stephen H Scott (2) (6)
  
  1. School of Computing ; Queen鈥檚 University ; Kingston ; ON ; Canada
  2. Centre for Neuroscience Studies ; Queen鈥檚 University ; Kingston ; ON ; Canada
  3. University of South Carolina ; Columbia ; SC ; USA
  4. Providence Care ; St. Mary鈥檚 of the Lake Hospital ; Kingston ; ON ; Canada
  5. Hotchkiss Brain Institute ; University of Calgary ; Calgary ; AB ; Canada
  6. Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences ; Queen鈥檚 University ; Kingston ; ON ; Canada
  
• 关键词：Stroke ; Assessment ; Motor skills ; Robotics ; Rehabilitation
• 刊名：Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：December 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：11
• 期：1
• 全文大小：610 KB
• 参考文献：1. Scott, SH, Dukelow, SP (2011) Potential of robots as next-generation technology for clinical assessment of neurological disorders and upper-limb therapy. J Rehabil Res Dev 48: pp. 335-353 CrossRef
  2. Council MR 2nd edition. London: Her majesty鈥檚 stationery office; 1943:1鈥?. [ / Aids to investigation of peripheral nerve injuries, Volume 7]
  3. Gowland, C, Stratford, P, Ward, M, Moreland, J, Torresin, W, Hullenaar, SV, Sanford, J, Barreca, S, Vanspall, B, Plews, N (1993) Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment. Stroke J Cereb Circ 24: pp. 58-63 CrossRef
  4. Fugl-Meyer, AR, Jaasko, L, Leyman, I, Olsson, S, Steglind, S (1975) The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 7: pp. 13-31
  5. Gladstone, DJ, Danells, CJ, Black, SE (2002) The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair 16: pp. 232-240 CrossRef
  6. Hsueh, IP, Hsu, MJ, Sheu, CF, Lee, S, Hsieh, CL, Lin, JH (2008) Psychometric comparisons of 2 versions of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale and 2 versions of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 22: pp. 737-744 308315999" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  7. Wolf, SL, Catlin, PA, Ellis, M, Archer, AL, Morgan, B, Piacentino, A (2001) Sssessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 32: pp. 1635-1639 32.7.1635" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  8. Lehrer, N, Attygalle, S, Wolf, SL, Rikakis, T (2011) Exploring the bases for a mixed reality stroke rehabilitation system, part I: a unified approach for representing action, quantitative evaluation, and interactive feedback. J Neuroeng Rehabil 8: pp. 51 3-0003-8-51" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  9. Simo, LS, Ghez, C, Botzer, L, Scheidt, RA (2011) A quantitative and standardized robotic method for the evaluation of arm proprioception after stroke. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. pp. 8227-8230
  10. Wolpert, DM, Flanagan, JR (2010) Q&A: Robotics as a tool to understand the brain. BMC Biol 8: pp. 92 CrossRef
  11. Reinkensmeyer, DJ, Emken, JL, Cramer, SC (2004) Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 6: pp. 497-525 3.140223" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  12. Dukelow, SP, Herter, TM, Moore, KD, Demers, MJ, Glasgow, JI, Bagg, SD, Norman, KE, Scott, SH (2010) Quantitative assessment of limb position sense following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Rep 24: pp. 178-187 309345267" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  13. Coderre, AM, Zeid, AA, Dukelow, SP, Demmer, MJ, Moore, KD, Demers, MJ, Bretzke, H, Herter, TM, Glasgow, JI, Norman, KE, Bagg, SD, Scott, SH (2010) Assessment of upper-limb sensorimotor function of subacute stroke patients using visually guided reaching. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24: pp. 528-541 309356091" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  14. Roy, A, Krebs, HI, Bever, CT, Forrester, LW, Macko, RF, Hogan, N (2011) Measurement of passive ankle stiffness in subjects with chronic hemiparesis using a novel ankle robot. J Neurophysiol 105: pp. 2132-2149 CrossRef
  15. Volpe, BT, Huerta, PT, Zipse, JL, Rykman, A, Edwards, D, Dipietro, L, Hogan, N, Krebs, HI (2009) Robotic devices as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for stroke recovery. Arch Neurol 66: pp. 1086-1090 CrossRef
  16. Bosecker, C, Dipietro, L, Volpe, B, Krebs, HI (2010) Kinematic robot-based evaluation scales and clinical counterparts to measure upper limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24: pp. 62-69 309343214" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  17. Celik, O, O鈥橫alley, MK, Boake, C, Levin, HS, Yozbatiran, N, Reistetter, TA (2010) Normalized movement quality measures for therapeutic robots strongly correlate with clinical motor impairment measures. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 18: pp. 433-444 CrossRef
  18. Reinkensmeyer, DJ, Kahn, LE, Averbuch, M, McKenna-Cole, A, Schmit, BD, Rymer, WZ (2000) Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. J Rehabil Res Dev 37: pp. 653-662
  19. Reinkensmeyer, DJ, Schmit, BD, Rymer, WZ (1999) Mechatronic assessment of arm impairment after chronic brain injury. Technol Health Care 7: pp. 431-435
  20. Krebs, HI (2011) Rehabilitation robotics: an academic engineer perspective. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. pp. 6709-6712
  21. Einav, O, Geva, D, Yoeli, D, Kerzhner, M, Mauritz, KH (2011) Development and validation of the first robotic scale for the clinical assessment of upper extremity motor impairments in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil 18: pp. 587-598 310/tsr18s01-587" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  22. Zackowski, KM, Dromerick, AW, Sahrmann, SA, Thach, WT, Bastian, AJ (2004) How do strength, sensation, spasticity and joint individuation relate to the reaching deficits of people with chronic hemiparesis?. Brain 127: pp. 1035-1046 3/brain/awh116" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  23. Zollo, L, Rossini, L, Bravi, M, Magrone, G, Sterzi, S, Guglielmelli, E (2011) Quantitative evaluation of upper-limb motor control in robot-aided rehabilitation. Med Biol Eng Comput 49: pp. 1131-1144 CrossRef
  24. Squeri, V, Zenzeri, J, Morasso, P, Basteris, A (2011) Integrating proprioceptive assessment with proprioceptive training of stroke patients. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. Zurich, Switzerlandpp. 5975500
  25. Cirstea, MC, Mitnitski, AB, Feldman, AG, Levin, MF (2003) Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke. Exp Brain Res 151: pp. 289-300 3-1438-0" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  26. Krabben, T, Prange, GB, Molier, BI, Rietman, JS, Buurke, JH (2011) Objective measurement of synergistic movement patterns of the upper extremity following stroke: an explorative study. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. Zurich, Switzerlandpp. 5975430
  27. Velicki, MR, Winstein, CJ, Pohl, PS (2000) Impaired direction and extent specification of aimed arm movements in humans with stroke-related brain damage. Exp Brain Res 130: pp. 362-374 CrossRef
  28. Haaland, KY, Schaefer, SY, Knight, RT, Adair, J, Magalhaes, A, Sadek, J, Sainburg, RL (2009) Ipsilesional trajectory control is related to contralesional arm paralysis after left hemisphere damage. Exp Brain Res 196: pp. 195-204 36-z" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  29. Haaland, KY, Prestopnik, JL, Knight, RT, Lee, RR (2004) Hemispheric asymmetries for kinematic and positional aspects of reaching. Brain 127: pp. 1145-1158 3/brain/awh133" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  30. Schaefer, SY, Haaland, KY, Sainburg, RL (2009) Hemispheric specialization and functional impact of ipsilesional deficits in movement coordination and accuracy. Neuropsychologia 47: pp. 2953-2966 CrossRef
  31. Chestnut, C, Haaland, KY (2008) Functional significance of ipsilesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89: pp. 62-68 CrossRef
  32. Sunderland, A (2000) Recovery of ipsilateral dexterity after stroke. Stroke 31: pp. 430-433 31.2.430" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  33. Laufer, Y, Gattenio, L, Parnas, E, Sinai, D, Sorek, Y, Dickstein, R (2001) Time-related changes in motor performance of the upper extremity ipsilateral to the side of the lesion in stroke survivors. Neurorehabiln Neural Repair 15: pp. 167-172 30101500303" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  34. Chen, S, Lewthwaite, R, Schweighofer, N, Winstein, CJ (2012) Discriminant validity of a new measure of self-efficacy for reaching movements after stroke-induced hemiparesis. J Hand Ther 26: pp. 116-122 CrossRef
  35. Wilson, B, Cockburn, J, Halligan, P (1987) Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68: pp. 98-102
  36. Oldfield, RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: pp. 97-113 3932(71)90067-4" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  37. Nasreddine, ZS, Phillips, NA, Bedirian, V, Charbonneau, S, Whitehead, V, Collin, I, Cummings, JL, Chertkow, H (2005) The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Ger Soc 53: pp. 695-699 32-5415.2005.53221.x" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  38. Keith, RA, Granger, CV, Hamilton, BB, Sherwin, FS (1987) The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil 1: pp. 6-18
  39. Scott, SH (1999) Apparatus for measuring and perturbing shoulder and elbow joint positions and torques during reaching. J Neurosci Meth 89: pp. 119-127 3-9" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  40. Cormen, TH, Leiserson, CE, Rivest, RL (1990) Introduction to algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. New York
  41. Dejong, SL, Birkenmeier, RL, Lang, CE (2012) Person-specific changes in motor performance accompany upper extremity functional gains after stroke. J Appl Biomech 28: pp. 304-316
  42. Dejong, SL, Lang, CE (2012) Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral upper extremity task performance after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 19: pp. 294-305 310/tsr1904-294" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  43. Scheffer, C, Cloete, T (2012) Inertial motion capture in conjunction with an artificial neural network can differentiate the gait patterns of hemiparetic stroke patients compared with able-bodied counterparts. Comp Meth Biomech Biomed Eng 15: pp. 285-294 36" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  44. Stokic, DS, Horn, TS, Ramshur, JM, Chow, JW (2009) Agreement between temporospatial gait parameters of an electronic walkway and a motion capture system in healthy and chronic stroke populations. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 88: pp. 437-444 3e3181a5b1ec" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  45. Subramanian, SK, Levin, MF (2011) Viewing medium affects arm motor performance in 3D virtual environments. J Neuroeng Rehabil 8: pp. 36 3-0003-8-36" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  46. Mutha, PK, Sainburg, RL, Haaland, KY (2011) Critical neural substrates for correcting unexpected trajectory errors and learning from them. Brain 134: pp. 3647-3661 3/brain/awr275" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  47. Haaland, KY, Harrington, DL (1996) Hemispheric asymmetry of movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol 6: pp. 796-800 388(96)80030-4" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  48. Schaefer, SY, Mutha, PK, Haaland, KY, Sainburg, RL (2012) Hemispheric specialization for movement control produces dissociable differences in online corrections after stroke. Cerebr Cortex 22: pp. 1407-1419 3/cercor/bhr237" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  49. Fisk, JD, Goodale, MA (1988) The effects of unilateral brain damage on visually guided reaching: hemispheric differences in the nature of the deficit. Exp Brain Res 72: pp. 425-435 CrossRef
  50. Winstein, CJ, Pohl, PS (1995) Effects of unilateral brain damage on the control of goal-directed hand movements. Exp Brain Res 105: pp. 163-174 CrossRef
  51. Kerkhoff, G (2001) Spatial hemineglect in humans. Prog Neurobiol 63: pp. 1-27 301-0082(00)00028-9" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  52. Robertson, IH, Marshall, JC (1993) Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NY
  53. Rode, G, Rossetti, Y, Badan, M, Boisson, D (2001) Role of rehabilitation in hemineglect syndromes. Rev Neurologique 157: pp. 497-505
  54. Serrien, DJ, Ivry, RB, Swinnen, SP (2006) Dynamics of hemispheric specialization and integration in the context of motor control. Nat Rev Neurosci 7: pp. 160-166 38/nrn1849" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  55. Dukelow, S, Herter, TM, Bagg, SD, Scott, SH (2012) The independence of deficits in position sense and visually guided reaching following stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 9: pp. 72 3-0003-9-72" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  56. Debert, CT, Herter, TM, Scott, SH, Dukelow, S (2012) Robotic assessment of sensorimotor deficits after traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Phys Ther 36: pp. 58-67 3e318254bd4f" target="_blank" title="It opens in new window">CrossRef
  57. Williams, L, Jackson, CP, Choe, N, Pelland, L, Scott, SH, Reynolds, JN (2014) Sensory-motor deficits in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder assessed using a robotic virtual reality platform. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 38: pp. 116-125 CrossRef
  
• 刊物主题：Neurosciences; Neurology; Rehabilitation Medicine; Biomedical Engineering;
• 出版者：BioMed Central
• ISSN：1743-0003

文摘

Background Existing clinical scores of upper limb function often use observer-based ordinal scales that are subjective and commonly have floor and ceiling effects. The purpose of the present study was to develop an upper limb motor task to assess objectively the ability of participants to select and engage motor actions with both hands. Methods A bilateral robotic system was used to quantify upper limb sensorimotor function of participants with stroke. Participants performed an object hit task that required them to hit virtual balls moving towards them in the workspace with virtual paddles attached to each hand. Task difficulty was initially low, but increased with time by increasing the speed and number of balls in the workspace. Data were collected from 262 control participants and 154 participants with recent stroke. Results Control participants hit ~60 to 90% of the 300 balls with relatively symmetric performance for the two arms. Participants with recent stroke performed the task with most participants hitting fewer balls than 95% of healthy controls (67% of right-affected and 87% of left-affected strokes). Additionally, nearly all participants (97%) identified with visuospatial neglect hit fewer balls than healthy controls. More detailed analyses demonstrated that most participants with stroke displayed asymmetric performance between their affected and non-affected limbs with regards to number of balls hit, workspace area covered by the limb and hand speed. Inter-rater reliability of task parameters was high with half of the correlations above 0.90. Significant correlations were observed between many of the task parameters and the Functional Independence Measure and/or the Behavioural Inattention Test. Conclusions As this object hit task requires just over two minutes to complete, it provides an objective and easy approach to quantify upper limb motor function and visuospatial skills following stroke.