Pathways towards the integration of periurban agrarian ecosystems into the spatial planning system

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Marian Simon Rojo (1)
  Ana Zazo Moratalla (1)
  Nerea Moran Alonso (1)
  Veronica Hernandez Jimenez (2)
  
  1. GIAUS (Architecture ; Urbanism and Sustainability Research Group) ; School of Architecture ; Technical University of Madrid ; Avda. Juan de Herrera s/n. ; 28040 ; Madrid ; Spain
  2. ECOPAI (Ecology and Landscape Research Group) ; School of Forestry ; Polytechnical University of Madrid ; Avda. Ramiro de Maeztu s/n. ; 28040 ; Madrid ; Spain
  
• 关键词：Ecosystem service indicators ; Institutional inertia ; Land use planning ; Participatory mapping ; Periurban farming ; Rural ; urban fringe
• 刊名：Ecological Processes
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：December 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：3
• 期：1
• 全文大小：3,137 KB
• 参考文献：1. Alberich, T Perspectivas de la investigaci贸n social. In: Rodr铆guez Villasante, T, Monta帽茅z, M, Mart铆, J eds. (2000) La investigaci贸n social participativa. El viejo topo, Madrid
  2. Angel, S, Parent, J, Civco, DL, Blei, AM (2011) Making room for a planet of cities. Policy Focus Report, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA
  3. Antrop, M (2000) Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 77: pp. 17-28 CrossRef
  Informe Municipal Paisaje Cultural. Aranjuez, Madrid
  4. Ay, J-S, Napoleone, C (2013) Efficiency and equity in land conservation: the effects of policy scale. J Environ Manag 129: pp. 190-198 CrossRef
  5. Bell, S (1999) Landscape: pattern perception and process. E & F N Spon, London
  6. Banco Mundial (2012) CO2 Emmission Data. Indicators databank. 釁?[http://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC]. Accessed 01 Sep 2013
  7. Briz, J, Felipe, I, Asunci贸n, I Cadena de valor corta: caso hortofrut铆cola Aranjuez-Madrid. In: Briz, J, Felipe, I eds. (2011) La Cadena de Valor Agroalimentaria. Editorial Agr铆cola, Madrid
  8. Bryant, CR (1995) The role of local actors in transforming the urban fringe. J Rural Stud 11: pp. 255-267 CrossRef
  9. Carbone, A, Subioli, G (2008) The generational turnover in agriculture: the ageing dynamics and the EU support policies to young farmers. 109th EAAE Seminar, Viterbo, Italy
  Plan de ordenaci贸n de recursos naturales del parque regional en torno a los ejes de los cursos bajos de los r铆os Manzanares y Jarama. Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid
  10. CM - Comunidad de Madrid (2009) 釁?Plan de Regulaci贸n de Usos y Gesti贸n del Parque regional en torno a los ejes de los cursos bajos de los r铆os Manzanares y Jarama, Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid
  11. CM - Comunidad de Madrid (2009) 釁?Plan de Regulaci贸n de Usos y Gesti贸n del Parque regional en torno a los ejes de los cursos bajos de los r铆os Manzanares y Jarama, Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid
  12. Costanza, R (2008) Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biol Conserv 120: pp. 549-565
  13. Crossman, DN, Burkhard, B, Nedkov, S, Willemen, L, Petz, K, Palomo, I, Drakou, EG, Mart谋麓n-Lopez, B, McPhearson, T, Boyanova, K, Alkemade, R, Egoh, B, Dunbar, MB, Maes, J (2013) A blue print for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 4: pp. 4-14 CrossRef
  14. Darly, S, Torre, A (2013) Conflicts over farmland uses and the dynamics of 鈥渁gri-urban鈥?localities in the Greater Paris Region: An empirical analysis based on daily regional press and field interviews. Land Use Policy 33: pp. 90-99 CrossRef
  15. Groot, R (2006) Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 75: pp. 175-186 CrossRef
  Evaluaci贸n de Ecosistemas del Milenio en Espa帽a. Conservaci贸n de los Servicios de los Ecosistemas y la biodiversidad para el bienestar humano. Informe final, UAM, Madrid
  EC DG-ARD. Situation and prospects for EU Agriculture and rural areas, EC previous European Commission
  Fern谩ndez Ruiz, L eds. (2012) Las aguas subterr谩neas en la planificaci贸n hidrogeol贸gica. Geol贸gico y Minero de Espa帽a, Instituto
  16. Freire, P (1993) Interrogantes y propuestas. Temas de psicolog铆a social IV:13. IV: pp. 釁
  Galli, M, Lardon, S, Marraccini, E, Bonari, eds. (2010) Agricultural management in periurban areas. The experience of an international workshop. Felici Editore, Italia
  17. Hernandez-Jimenez, V, Oc贸n, B, Encinas, MA, Pereira, D, Winder, NP Planificaci贸n participativa en el entorno de las grandes ciudades. In: Farin贸s, J, Romero, J, Salom, J eds. (2009) Cohesi贸n e Inteligencia Territorial. Universitat de Valencia, Valencia
  18. Herrera Calvo, PM (2013) Una aproximaci贸n a la conectividad ecol贸gica aplicada a la planificaci贸n territorial: modelizaci贸n para el caso de Valladolid y Entorno/An approach to ecological connectivity applied tool and planning: modelling the case of Valladolid and its environs. Ciudades Dosser 1: pp. 149-240
  19. Hewitt, R, Hernandez-Jimenez, V (2010) Devolved regions, fragmented landscapes: the struggle for sustainability in Madrid. Sustainability 2: pp. 1252-1281 CrossRef
  20. Houston, P (2005) Re-valuing the fringe: some findings on the value of agricultural production in Australia鈥檚 peri-urban regions. Geogr Res 43: pp. 209-223 CrossRef
  21. Ib谩帽ez, J (1985) An谩lisis sociol贸gico de textos y discursos. Revista Internacional de Sociolog铆a 43: pp. 121-159
  Agricltural and Population & Housing Census. National Statistics Institute, Madrid
  22. Lemon, M (2005) Exploring environmental change using an interpretative method. Taylor and Francis E Library, The Netherlands
  23. Lodder, E (2012) Pressure on land in periurban Vietnam. The impact of agricultural land conversion and the need for livelihood diversification in Thuy Duong commune, Universiteit Utrecht
  24. Maes, J, Braat, L, Jax, K, Hutchins, M, Furman, E, Termansen, M, Luque, S, Paracchini, ML, Chauvin, C, Williams, R, Volk, M, Lautenbach, S, Kopperoinen, L, Schelhaas, MJ, Weinert, J, Goossen, M, Dumont, E, Strauch, M, G枚rg, C, Dormann, C, Katwinkel, M, Zulian, G, Varjopuro, R, Ratam盲ki, O, Hauck, J, Forsius, M, Hengeveld, G, Perez-Soba, M, Bouraoui, F, Scholz, M (2011) A spatial assessment of ecosystem services in Europe: methods, case studies and policy analysis - phase 1. PEER Report No 3. Partnership for European Environmental Research, Ispra
  25. Maes, J, Teller, A, Erhard, M, Liquete, C, Braat, L, Berry, P, Egoh, B, Puydarrieux, P, Fiorina, C, Santos, F, Paracchini, ML, Keune, H, Wittmer, H, Hauck, J, Fiala, I, Verburg, PH, Cond茅, S, Sch盲gner, JP, San Miguel, J, Estreguil, C, Ostermann, O, Barredo, JI, Pereira, HM, Stott, A, Laporte, V, Meiner, A, Olah, B, Royo Gelabert, E, Spyropoulou, R, Petersen, JE (2013) Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under action 5 of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, Publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg
  Ministerio de Agricultura. Anuario de estad铆stica 2006. Superficies y producciones de cultivos, Alimentaci贸n y Medio Ambiente, Espa帽a
  Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentacion y Medio ambiente. Sistema Integrado de Informaci贸n del Agua, SIA
  Ministerio de Agricultura. Apoyo a la caracterizaci贸n adicional de las masas de agua subterr谩nea en riesgo de no cumplir los objetivos medioambientales en 2015. Demarcaci贸n hidrogr谩fica del Tajo, Alimentacion y Medio ambiente
  Environmental Profile of Spain. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Madrid
  26. Mart铆n-L贸pez, B, G贸mez-Baggethun, E, Montes, C (2009) Un marco conceptual para la gesti贸n de las interacciones naturaleza-sociedad en un mundo cambiante [A conceptual framework to manage interactions between nature and society in a changing world]. Cuides 3: pp. 229-258
  27. Mart铆n-L贸pez, B, Montes, C (2011) Los sistemas socioecol贸gicos: entendiendo las relaciones entre la biodiversidad y el bienestar humano. Biodiversidad y servicios de los ecosistemas. Biodiversidad en Espa帽a: base de la sostenibilidad ante el cambio global. Observatorio de la Sostenibilidad en Espa帽a (OSE) 6: pp. 444-465
  28. Mata, R, Rodr铆guez, I (1987) Propiedad y explotaci贸n agrarias en el regad铆o de las 鈥渧egas鈥?de Madrid. Agric Soc 42: pp. 149-180
  29. Matar谩n Ruiz, A (2013) Participaci贸n social en la protecci贸n activa de los espacios agrarios periurbanos: un estado de la cuesti贸n. Bolet铆n de la Asociaci贸n de Ge贸grafos Espa帽oles, 釁
  McGregor, D, Simon, D, Thompson, D eds. (2006) The peri-urban interface: Approaches to sustainable natural and human resource use. Earthscan, London
  30. Merlos, M (2012) Jornadas sobre Patrimonio como recurso Did谩ctico. DG. Educaci贸n y Cultura, Ayuntamiento de Aranjuez
  Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington
  31. Monta帽茅s, M (2010) Interpretaci贸n de textos y discursos al servicio del DesarrolloLocal. Cuadernos CIMAS, Observatorio Internacional de Ciudadania y Medio Ambiente Sostenible, Madrid
  32. Moreno Flores, O (2007) Agricultura Urbana. Nuevas Estrategias de Integraci贸n Social y Recuperaci贸n Ambiental en la Ciudad. Revista Electr贸nica DU&P, Dise帽o Urbano y Paisaje Volumen IV N掳11. Centro de Estudios Arquitect贸nicos, Urban铆sticos y del Paisaje Universidad Central de Chile, Santiago, Chile
  33. Mougeot, LJA (2006) Growing better cities. Urban agriculture for sustainable development. IDRC, Canada
  34. Mundial, B (2012) CO2 Emmission Data. Base, World Bank Data
  35. Murdoch, J, Abram, S (1998) Defining the limits of community governance. J Rural Stud 14: pp. 41-50 CrossRef
  36. Naredo, JM, Garc铆a Zald铆var, R (2008) Estudio sobre la ocupaci贸n del suelo por usos urbano-industriales, aplicado a la Comunidad de Madrid. Universidad Polit茅cnica de Madrid y Ministerio de Medio. Ambiente, Madrid
  Anual Report of Sustainability in Spain. National Observatory for Sustainability, Alcal谩 de Henar茅s
  37. Paul, V, Tonts, M (2005) Containing urban sprawl: trends in land use and spatial planning in the metropolitan region of Barcelona. J Environ Plan Manag 48: pp. 7-35 CrossRef
  38. Plieninger, T, Bieling, C (2012) Resilience and the cultural landscape. understanding and managing change in human shape environment, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRef
  39. Power, AG (2010) Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Phil Trans R Soc B 365: pp. 2959-2971 CrossRef
  40. Pretty, J (2003) Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302: pp. 1912-1914 CrossRef
  41. Ritchie, J, Spencer, L Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman, A, Burgess, RG eds. (1994) Analyzing qualitative data. 釁? 釁? pp. 173-194 CrossRef
  42. Romano, B (2002) Evaluation of urban fragmentation in the ecosystems, Proceedings of International Conference on Mountain Environment and Development (ICMED), ottobre 15-19 2002. Chengdu, China
  43. Santos, Y, Ganges, L, Herrera Calvo, PM, Rivas Sanz JL, D l, Lalana Soto, JL (2013) Bases conceptuales en la planificaci贸n espacial de cara a la protecci贸n ambiental y paisaj铆stica/New conceptual basis for spatial planning facing environmental and landscape protection. Ciudades 1: pp. 113-138
  Gu铆a de la alimentaci贸n saludable. Sociedad Espa帽ola de Nutrici贸n Comunitaria, Madrid
  44. Simon Rojo, M, Moran Alonso, N, Zazo Moratalla, A, Rodriguez Alonso, R (2012) Urbanism and periurban agrarian ecosystems. International Seminar, Assessment of PAEc-SP Project Outcomes, Mairea, Madrid
  45. Simon Rojo, M, Zazo Moratalla, A, Moran Alonso, N (2012) Nuevos enfoques de planificaci贸n territorial para re(con)ducir la vulnerabilidad de los espacios agrarios periurbanos. Ciudades 15: pp. 151-166
  46. Staub, C, Ott, W (2011) Indicators for Ecosystem Goods and Services. Framework, methodology and recommendations for a welfare-related environmental reporting, Federal Office for the Environment, Bern. Environ Stud
  47. Swinton, SM, Lupi, F, Robertson, GP, Hamilton, SK (2007) Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol Econ 64: pp. 242-252 CrossRef
  The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity ecological and economic foundations. Kumar P, Earthscan, London and Washington
  The UK national ecosystem assessment technical report. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge
  48. Veenhuizen, R, Danso, G (2007) Profitability and sustainability of urban and periurban agriculture. FAO, Rome
  49. Villasante, RT (2006) Desbordes creativos. Estilos y estrategias para la transformaci贸n social. La Catarata, Madrid
  50. Villasante, RT, Monta帽茅s, M, Mart铆, J (2000) La investigaci贸n social participativa. El Viejo Topo, Madrid
  51. Voogd, H, Woltjer, J (1999) The communicative ideology in spatial planning: some critical reflections based on the Dutch experience. Environ Plann B 26: pp. 835-854 CrossRef
  52. Williams, NSG, McDonnell, MJ, Seager, EJ (2005) Factors influencing the loss of an endangered ecosystem in an urbanising landscape: a case study of native grasslands from Melbourne, Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 71: pp. 35-49 CrossRef
  53. Wodak, R Critical discourse analysis. In: Seale, C, Gobo, G, Gubrium, JF, Silverman, D eds. (2004) Qualitative research practice. Concise Paperback Edition. Sage, London
  54. Zasada, I (2011) Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture 鈥?a review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy 28: pp. 639-648 CrossRef
  
• 刊物主题：Environment, general;
• 出版者：Springer Berlin Heidelberg
• ISSN：2192-1709

文摘

Introduction The potential of periurban agrarian ecosystems is recognized as one of the cornerstones for improving urban sustainability; however, this potential has been disregarded in spatial planning and decision making. The main goal of the PAEc-SP project was to assess the feasibility of integrating periurban agricultural areas into spatial planning by developing a viable ecosystem services-based methodology. Methods The research unfolded along three axes: i) mapping ecosystem services in periurban areas, distinguishing between the current state and the future potential by applying a set of indicators; ii) analyzing the regulatory framework, identifying gaps in the consideration of agrarian ecosystem services; and iii) analyzing the perceptions of these areas held by local actors. Provisioning services (food) are widely recognized by actors and plans, but this leads to weak protection. Results Cultural services (identity, recreation) are also recognized by all actors and addressed by local urban planning, though this is not connected to farming practices. Regulating services (CO2 storage, water quality) are barely addressed by spatial planning and actors do not value them either. Supporting services (biodiversity) are mostly associated with natural areas. Most technicians are reluctant to changes, while new farmers and civil society demand a new holistic approach. Conclusion The reluctant attitude to change of some actors and the inadequate understanding of ecosystem services, render it imperative to adopt a comprehensive approach through a participatory process of urban planning. Mapping ecosystem services, calculations, and graphs are a valuable communication tool both in discussing the consequences of the loss of agrarian ecosystems with different actors and in planning future scenarios.