School as Stakeholder of Corporate Social Responsibility Program: Teacher’s Perspective on Outcome in School Development
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Maimunah Ismail (1)
Ratna Fauzi Amat Johar (1)
Roziah Mohd Rasdi (1)
Siti Noormi Alias (1) - 关键词：Business corporation ; Corporate social responsibility ; School development
- 刊名：The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher
- 出版年：2014
- 出版时间：June 2014
- 年：2014
- 卷：23
- 期：2
- 页码：321-331
- 全文大小：
- 参考文献：1. Abdul Rahim, R., Jalaludin, F. W., & Tajuddin, K. (2010). / Consumer behaviour towards corporate social responsibility in Malaysia (pp. 1-7). Kuching: Conference Master.
2. Abdul Rashid, M. Z., & Ibrahim, S. (2002). Executive and management attitudes towards corporate social responsibility in Malaysia. / Corporate Governance, / 2(4), 10-6. CrossRef
3. Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. / Academy of Management Journal, / 28(2), 446-63. CrossRef
4. Borel, R., Cawagas, V., Jimenez, A., & Salvetti, N. (2011). Education for sustainable development at the university for peace. / Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, / 5(2), 245-49. doi:10.1177/097340821100500214 . CrossRef
5. Canada. (2010). School development in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador. Retrieved January 14, 2011 from http://www.edu.gov.nf.ca/schooldev/default.htm.
6. Carroll, A. B. (2004). Managing ethically with global stakeholders: A present and future challenge. / Academy of Management Executive, / 18(2), 114-20. CrossRef
7. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. / International Journal of Management Reviews, / 12(1), 85-05. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x . CrossRef
8. Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. / Business & Society, / 44(4), 415-41. doi:10.1177/0007650305281658 . CrossRef
9. Cheung, C. K. (2008). Practicing entrepreneurship education for secondary pupils through the operation of New Year stall in Hong Kong. / The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, / 17(1), 15-1. CrossRef
10. Chikami, S., & Sobue, K. (2008). Creating a sustainable city through a system of citizen-based learning: ESD at Nagoya Open University of the environment. / Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, / 2(2), 127-39. doi:10.1177/097340820800200210 .
11. Cushla, K., & Hay, S. (2009). Industry school partnerships: Reconstituting spaces of educational governance. / Globalisation, Societies and Education, / 7(2), 203-16. CrossRef
12. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. / Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, / 15(1), 1-3. doi:10.1002/csr.132 . CrossRef
13. Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping and territory. / Journal of Business Ethics, / 53, 51-4. CrossRef
14. Idemudia, U. (2007). Community perceptions and expectations: Reinventing the wheels of corporate social responsibility practices in the Nigerian oil industry. / Business and Society Review, / 112(3), 369-05. CrossRef
15. Ismail, M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and its role in community development: An international perspective. / The Journal of International Social Research, / 2(9), 199-09.
16. Karpudewan, M., Ismail, Z. H., & Mohamed, N. (2011). Green chemistry: Educating prospective science teachers in education for sustainable development at school of educational studies, USM. / Journal of Social Science USM, / 7(1), 42-0. doi:10.3844/jssp.2011.42.50 . CrossRef
17. Keitel, R. (2008). A proposed model of higher education institution–call center industry partnership. / The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, / 17(2), 203-14. CrossRef
18. Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. / Educational and Psychological Measurement, / 30(3), 607-10.
19. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). / Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Lee, M.-D. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. / International Journal of Management Reviews, / 10(1), 53-3. CrossRef
21. Leedy, P. D. (1997). / Practical research: Planning and design. Columbus, OH: Merrill of Prentice Hall.
22. Lu, J. Y., & Castka, P. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in Malaysia: Experts-views and perspectives. / Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, / 16(3), 146-54. CrossRef
23. Mathar, R. (2010). Practices of integrating the earth charter into education activities in German Federal States of Hessen and Rheinland-Pfalz. / Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, / 4(2), 279-82. CrossRef
24. Mitsui & Co. (2012). Retrieved 15 May, 2012 from http://www.mitsui.co.jp/en/csr/contribution/.
25. Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2007). Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Some Malaysian evidence. / Corporate Governance, / 7(3), 251-66. CrossRef
26. Naeem, M. A., & Peach, N. W. (2011). Promotion of sustainability in postgraduate education in the Asia Pacific region. / International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, / 12(3), 280-90. doi:10.1108/14676371111148063 . CrossRef
27. Performance Management and Delivery Unit (PEMANDU). (2010). / Economic transformation program. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Performance Management and Delivery Unit (PEMANDU), Prime Minister’s Department.
28. Sampsize. (2005). Retrieved July 9, 2012 from http://sampsize.sourceforge.net/iface/index.html.
29. Secchi, D. (2007). Utilitarian, managerial and relational theories of corporate social responsibility. / International Journal of Management Reviews, / 9(4), 347-73. CrossRef
30. Siwar, C., & Hossain, T. M. (2009). An analysis of Islamic CSR concept and the opinions of Malaysian managers. / Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, / 20(3), 290-98. CrossRef
31. Siwar, C., & Md Harizan, S. H. (2009). / A study on corporate social responsibility practices amongst business organizations in Malaysia. Bangi: Institute for Environment and Development, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
32. Tan, G., & Komaran, R. (2006). Perception of corporate social responsibility: An empirical study in Singapore. / Paper presented at the Thirteenth Annual International Conference on Advances in Management, 26 June, Singapore.
33. The Prime Minister’s CSR Awards. (2010). Retrieved December 9, 2010 from http://www.anugerahcsrmalaysia.org/.
34. Visser, W. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in developing countries. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), / The Oxford handbook of CSR (pp. 473-99). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Wang, Q. (2011). Characteristics of ESD-promoting strategies in China’s basic education. / Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, / 5(2), 215-23. doi:10.1177/097340821100500211 . CrossRef
36. Weller, M., & Dillon, P. (1999). Education and business partnerships in the United Kingdom: Initiatives in search of a rationale. / Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, / 19(1), 60-7. doi:10.1177/027046769901900110 . CrossRef - 作者单位：Maimunah Ismail (1)
Ratna Fauzi Amat Johar (1)
Roziah Mohd Rasdi (1)
Siti Noormi Alias (1)
1. Department of Professional Development and Continuing Education, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia - ISSN：2243-7908
文摘
Knowledge of the outcome of corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs in school development in developing countries such as Malaysia is limited. This article examines types of CSR programs and the outcome on school development from the perspective of teachers. Data from a survey involving 273 teachers of schools that have participated in CSR programs, and data from focus group discussions with two groups of teachers were used in the analyses. The results of this exploratory study show that schools gained most from CSR programs in terms of improvement in the schools-physical infrastructure and facilities through funds provided, followed by provisions of reading materials for students and teachers in these programs. The results also revealed that the CSR programs contributed significantly to school development in terms of school living, student achievement, and school achievement.