Residential Concentrations of Rural Registered Sex Offenders

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Richard Tewksbury (1)
  Elizabeth Ehrhardt Mustaine (2)
  Kenneth M. Stengel (1)
  
• 关键词：Rural ; Registered sex offenders ; Residential characteristics
• 刊名：American Journal of Criminal Justice
• 出版年：2007
• 出版时间：September 2007
• 年：2007
• 卷：31
• 期：2
• 页码：49-63
• 全文大小：204KB
• 参考文献：1. Adams, D. B. (2002). / Summary of state sex offender registries, 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
  2. Adkins, G., Huff, D., & Stageberg, P. (2000). / The Iowa sex offender registry and recidivism. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Human Rights.
  3. Almgren, G., Guest, A., Immerwahr, G., & Spittle, M. (1998). Joblessness, family disruption, and violent death in Chicago, 1970鈥?990. / Social Forces, 76, 1465鈥?493. CrossRef
  4. Barnett, C., & Mencken, F. C. (2002). Social disorganization theory and the contextual nature of crime in nonmetropolitan counties. / Rural Sociology, 67(3), 362鈥?93.
  5. Baron, L., & Straus, M. (1989). / Four theories of rape in American society a state level analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  6. Berliner, L., Schram, D., Miller, L. L., & Milloy, C. D. (1995). A sentencing alternative for sex offenders: A study of decision making and recidivism. / Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10(4), 487鈥?02. CrossRef
  7. Bernasco, W., & Luykx, F. (2003). Effects of attractiveness, opportunity and accessibility to burglars on residential burglary rates of urban neighborhoods. / Criminology, 41(3), 981鈥?002. CrossRef
  8. Brantingham, P. J., & Brantingham, P. L. (1984). / Environmental criminology. Prospect Heights, Il: Waveland Press.
  9. Bursik Jr., R. J. (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. / Criminology, 26, 519鈥?51. CrossRef
  10. Bursik Jr., R. J. & Grasmick, H. G. (1993). / Neighborhoods and crime. San Francisco: Lexington Books.
  11. Capone, D. L., & Nichols, W. (1976). Urban structure and criminal mobility. / American Behavioral Scientist, 20, 199鈥?13. CrossRef
  12. Catalano, S. M. (2004). / Criminal victimization, 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
  13. Chatravorty, S., & Pelfrey, W. (2000). Exploratory data analysis of crime patterns: Preliminary findings from the Bronx. In V. Goldsmith, P. McGuire, J. Mollenkopf, & T. Ross (Eds.), / Analyzing crime patterns: Frontiers of practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  14. Crutchfield, R. D., Glusker, A., & Bridges, G. S. (1999). A tale of three cities; labor markets and homicide. / Sociological Focus, 32, 65鈥?3.
  15. Eck, J., Gersh, J., & Taylor, C. (2000). Finding crime hot spots through repeat address mapping. In V. Godsmith, P. McGuire, J. Mollenkopf, & T. Ross (Eds.), / Analyzing crime patterns: Frontiers of practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  16. Eck, J. E., & Weisburd, D. (1995). Crime places in crime theory. In J. E. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), / Crime and place. Monsey, N.Y.: Criminal Justice Press.
  17. Gentry, C. S. (1989). Six models of rape: An empirical analysis. unpublished.
  18. Goodrum, S., Wiese, H. J., & Leukefeld, C. G. (2004). Urban and rural differences in the relationship between substance use and violence. / International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(5), 613鈥?28. CrossRef
  19. Jobes, P. C., Barclay, E., & Weinand, H. (2004). A structural analysis of social disorganization and crime in rural communities in Australia. / Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 37(1), 114鈥?40. CrossRef
  20. Krivo, L. J., & Peterson, R. D. (1996). Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. / Social Forces, 75, 619鈥?50. CrossRef
  21. Lauritsen, J. L., & White, N. A. (2001). Putting violence in its place: The influence of race, ethnicity, gender, and place on the risk for violence. / Criminology & Public Policy, 1(1), 37鈥?0. CrossRef
  22. Levenson, J. S., & Cotter, L. P. (2005). The effect of Megan鈥檚 law on sex offender reintegration. / Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 49鈥?6. CrossRef
  23. Lieb, R. (1996). Community notification laws: A step towards more effective solutions. / Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11(2), 298鈥?00. CrossRef
  24. Martin, D. (2002). Spatial patterns in residential burglar: Assessing the effect of neighborhood social capital. / Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18(2), 132鈥?46. CrossRef
  25. Miethe, T. D., & Meier, R. (1994). / Crime and its social context: Toward an integrated theory of offenders, victims, and situations. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  26. Mustaine, E. E., Tewksbury, R., & Stengel, K. M. (2006). Social disorganization and residential locations of registered sex offenders: Is this a collateral consequence? / Deviant Behavior, 27(3), 329鈥?50. CrossRef
  27. Nielsen, A., & Martinez Jr., R. (2003). Reassessing the alcohol-violence linkage: Results from a multiethnic city. / Justice Quarterly, 20(3), 445鈥?69. CrossRef
  28. Osgood, D. W., & Chambers, J. M. (2000). Social disorganization outside the metropolis: An analysis of rural youth violence. / Criminology, 38(1), 81鈥?15. CrossRef
  29. Ouimet, M. (2000). Aggregation bias in ecological research: How social disorganization and criminal opportunities shape the spatial distribution of juvenile delinquency in Montreal. / Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42(2), 135鈥?56.
  30. Pawson, R. (2002). Does Megan鈥檚 Law work? A theory-driven systematic review. ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice: Working Paper 8. London: University of London. (Available at http://www.evidencenetwork.org/cgi-win/enet.exe/biblioview?780).
  31. Peterson, R. D., Krivo, L. J., & Harris, M. A. (2000). Disadvantage and neighborhood violent crime: Do local institutions matter? / Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 37(1), 31鈥?3. CrossRef
  32. Phillips, P. D. (1980). Characteristics and typology of the journal to crime. In D. E. Georges-Abeyie & K. D. Harries (Eds.), / Crime: A spatial perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.
  33. Rengert, G. F., Piquero, A. R., & Jones, P. R. (1999). Distance decay reexamined. / Criminology, 37(2), 427鈥?45. CrossRef
  34. Rossmo, D. K. (1995). Overview: Multivariate spatial profiles as a tool in crime investigation. In C. R. Block, M. Dabdoub & S. Fregly (Eds.), / Crime analysis through computer mapping. Washington, D.C.: Police Executive Research Forum.
  35. Ruback, R. B., & Menard, K. S. (2001). Rural-urban differences in sexual victimization and reporting: Analyses using UCR and crisis center data. / Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(2), 131鈥?55. CrossRef
  36. Sampson, R., & Groves, B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. / American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774鈥?02. CrossRef
  37. Sherman, L., & Rogan, D. (1995). Deterrence effects of police raids on crack houses: A randomized, controlled experiment. / Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 755鈥?82. CrossRef
  38. Skogan, W. G., & Maxfield, M. G. (1981). / Coping with crime: Individual and neighborhood reactions. Beverly Hills: Sage.
  39. Spelman, W. (1995). Criminal careers of public places. In J. E. Eck & D. Weisburd (Eds.), / Crime and place. Monsey, N.Y.: Criminal Justice Press.
  40. Szymkowiak, K., & Fraser, T. (2002). / Registered sex offenders in Hawaii. Honolulu, HI: Department of the Attorney General.
  41. Taylor, R. (1997). Social order and disorder of street blocks and neighborhoods: Ecology, microecology and the systemic model of social disorganization. / Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(1), 113鈥?55. CrossRef
  42. Tewksbury, R. (2002). Validity and utility of the Kentucky sex offender registry. / Federal Probation, 66(1), 21鈥?6.
  43. Tewksbury, R. (2004). Experiences and attitudes of registered female sex offenders. / Federal Probation, 68(3), 30鈥?3.
  44. Tewksbury, R. (2005). Collateral consequences of sex offender registration. / Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 67鈥?1. CrossRef
  45. Tewksbury, R., & Higgins, G. (2005). What can be learned from an online sex offender registry site? / Journal of Community Corrections, 14(3), 9鈥?1, 15鈥?6.
  46. Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. (2006). Consequences of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences of community experiences. / Sociological Spectrum, 26(3), 309鈥?34. CrossRef
  47. Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. (In-Press). Perceptions of Punishment: How Registered Sex Offenders View Registries. / Crime & Delinquency.
  48. Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (2006). Where to find sex offenders: An examination of residential locations and neighborhood conditions. / Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law, and Society, 19(1), 61鈥?5. CrossRef
  49. U.S. Census Bureau. (2005). Glossary: Census Tract. Available at: me/saff/main.html?_lang=en" class="a-plus-plus">http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en.
  50. Vandiver, D. M., & Walker, J. T. (2002). Female sex offenders: An overview and analysis of 40 cases. / Criminal Justice Review, 27(2), 284鈥?00. CrossRef
  51. Walker, J. T., Golden, J. W., & VanHouten, A. C. (2001). The geographic link between sex offenders and potential victims: A routine activities approach. / Justice Research and Policy, 3(2), 15鈥?3.
  52. Weisburd, D., & Green (Mazerolle) L. (1994). Defining the drug market: The case of the Jersey City DMA system. In D. L. MacKenzie & C. D. Uchida (Eds.), / Drugs and crime: Evaluating public policy initiatives. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  53. Weisheit, R. A., & Wells, L. E. (1996). Rural crime and justice: Implications for theory and research. / Crime & Delinquency, 42(3), 379鈥?97. CrossRef
  54. Zevitz, R. G., & Farkas, M. (2000). / Sex offender community notification: Assessing the impact in Wisconsin. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
  
• 作者单位：Richard Tewksbury (1)
  Elizabeth Ehrhardt Mustaine (2)
  Kenneth M. Stengel (1)
  
  1. Department of Justice Administration, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA
  2. Department of Sociology, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Blvd., Orlando, FL, 32816-1997, USA
  

文摘

This research employs social disorganization theory to examine the residential locations of registered sex offenders in rural areas. Data was gathered on 728 non-incarcerated registered sex offenders (RSOs) in the Appalachia region of Eastern Kentucky (41 counties total). Census tract data was used to assess the degree of social disorganization of residential locations of RSOs and to compare census tracts with high concentrations of registered sex offenders to the counties in which RSOs reside, the nation as a whole, and census tracts with low concentrations of RSOs. Results show that although there are significant social disorganization indicators present, there are few relationships between RSO residence and increased levels of social disorganization.