Interpreting the effects of response bias on remember-know judgments using signal detection and threshold models

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Caren M. Rotello (1)
  Neil A. Macmillan (1)
  Jason L. Hicks (2)
  Michael J. Hautus (3)
  
• 刊名：Memory & Cognition
• 出版年：2006
• 出版时间：December 2006
• 年：2006
• 卷：34
• 期：8
• 页码：1598-1614
• 全文大小：195KB
• 参考文献：1. Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. / Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 497-05.
  2. Diana, R. A., Reder, L. M., Arndt, J. , &Park, H. (2006). Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,13, 1-1.
  3. Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. / Memory & Cognition,24, 523-33.
  4. Dunn, J. C. (2004). Remember-know: A matter of confidence. / Psychological Review,111, 524-42. CrossRef
  5. Dunn, J. C. , &Kirsner, K. (1988). Discovering functionally independent mental processes: The principle of reversed association. / Psychological Review,95, 91-01. CrossRef
  6. Gardiner, J. M. , &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2000). Remembering and knowing. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), / The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 229-44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Gardiner, J. M., Richardson-Klavehn, A. , &Ramponi, C. (1997). On reporting recollective experiences and “direct access to memory systems.-em class="a-plus-plus">Psychological Science,8, 391-94. CrossRef
  8. Hicks, J. L. , &Marsh, R. L. (1999). Remember-know judgments can depend on how memory is tested. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 117-22.
  9. Hirshman, E. , &Henzler, A. (1998). The role of decision processes in conscious recollection. / Psychological Science,9, 61-5. CrossRef
  10. Ku?era, H. , &Francis, W. N. (1967). / Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
  11. Macmillan, N. A. , &Creelman, C. D. (2005). / Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  12. Malmberg, K. J. (2002). On the form of ROCs constructed from confidence ratings. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 380-87. CrossRef
  13. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. / Psychological Review,87, 252-71. CrossRef
  14. Myung, I. J. , &Pitt, M. A. (2002). Mathematical modeling. In H. Pashler & J. [T.] Wixted (Eds.), / Stevens-Handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 4. Methodology in experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 429-60). New York: Wiley.
  15. Postma, A. (1999). The influence of decision criteria upon remembering and knowing in recognition memory. / Acta Psychologica,103, 65-6. CrossRef
  16. Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. / Memory & Cognition,21, 89-02.
  17. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.-F. , &Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. / Psychological Review,99, 518-35. CrossRef
  18. Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P. , &Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 294-20. CrossRef
  19. Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A. , &Reeder, J. A. (2004). Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: A two-dimensional signal-detection model. / Psychological Review,111, 588-16. CrossRef
  20. Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., Reeder, J. A. , &Wong, M. (2005). The remember response: Subject to bias, graded, and not a process-pure indicator of recollection. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 865-73.
  21. Strack, F. , &F?rster, J. (1995). Reporting recollective experiences: Direct access to memory systems? / Psychological Science,6, 352-58. CrossRef
  22. Stretch, V. , &Wixted, J. T. (1998). Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgments. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1397-410. CrossRef
  23. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. / Canadian Psychology,26, 1-2.
  24. Wixted, J. T. , &Stretch, V. (2004). In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments. / Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 616-41.
  25. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1341-354. CrossRef
  26. Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. / Memory & Cognition,25, 747-63.
  27. Yonelinas, A. P. (2001). Consciousness, control, and confidence: The 3 Cs of recognition memory. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 361-79. CrossRef
  28. Yonelinas, A. P., Dobbins, I., Szymanski, M. D., Dhaliwal, H. S. , &King, L. (1996). Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection. / Consciousness & Cognition,5, 418-41. CrossRef
  29. Yonelinas, A. P. , &Jacoby, L. L. (1995). The relation between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition: Effects of size congruency. / Journal of Memory & Language,34, 622-43. CrossRef
  30. Yonelinas, A. P., Regehr, G. , &Jacoby, L. L. (1995). Incorporating response bias in a dual-process theory of memory. / Journal of Memory & Language,34, 821-35. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Caren M. Rotello (1)
  Neil A. Macmillan (1)
  Jason L. Hicks (2)
  Michael J. Hautus (3)
  
  1. Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Tobin Hall, 01003-7710, Amherst, MA
  2. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
  3. University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  

文摘

In recognition memory experiments, the tendency to identify a test item as “old-or “new-can be increased or decreased by instructions given at test. The effect of such response bias on remember-know judgments is to change “remember-as well as “old-responses. Existing models of the remember-know paradigm (based on dual-process and signal detection theories) interpret this effect as a shift in response criteria, but differ on the nature of the dimension along which the changes take place. We extended the models to account simultaneously for remember-know and confidence rating data and tested them using old-new (Experiment 1) and remember-know (Experiment 2) rating designs. Quantitative fits show that the signal detection models provide the best overall description of the data.