用户名: 密码: 验证码:
Integrated risk assessment of urban water supply systems from source to tap
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Abbas Roozbahani (1) (2)
    Banafsheh Zahraie (3)
    Massoud Tabesh (3)
  • 关键词:Risk assessment ; Urban water supply systems (UWSS) ; Fuzzy hierarchical risk assessment ; Fuzzy logic ; Vulnerability ; IFHRA ; WSS
  • 刊名:Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment (SERRA)
  • 出版年:2013
  • 出版时间:May 2013
  • 年:2013
  • 卷:27
  • 期:4
  • 页码:923-944
  • 全文大小:904 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Akgun I, Kandakoglu A, Ozok AF (2010) Fuzzy integrated vulnerability assessment model for critical facilities in combating the terrorism. J Expert Syst Appl 37(5):3561鈥?573 CrossRef
    2. ASME Innovative Technologies Institute, LLC (2006) Risk analysis and management for critical asset protection-RAMCAP, Version 2.0
    3. Aven T (2011) On some recent definitions and analysis frameworks for risk, vulnerability and resilience. J Risk Anal 31(4):515鈥?22 CrossRef
    4. Census of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2006) Statistical center of Iran http://www.amar.org.ir
    5. Chen SM (1998) Aggregating fuzzy opinions in the group decision making environment. Int J Cybern Syst 29(4):363鈥?76 CrossRef
    6. Cie艣lak BT (2011) Fuzzy failure risk analysis in drinking water technical system. RT&A 1(20):138鈥?48
    7. Clark RM, Deininger RA (2000) Protecting the nation鈥檚 critical infrastructure: the vulnerability of U.S. water supply systems. J Conting Crisis Manag 8(2):73鈥?0 CrossRef
    8. Dempster AP (1967) Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping. Annu Math Stat 38(2):325鈥?39 CrossRef
    9. Edwards W (1971) Social utilities. Eng Econ Summer Symp Ser 6:119鈥?29
    10. European Commission (EC) (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official J Eur Commun, L327/1, European Union
    11. Ezell BC (2007) Infrastructure vulnerability assessment model (I-VAM). J Risk Anal 27(3):571鈥?83 CrossRef
    12. Ezell BC, Farr JV, Wiese I (2000) Infrastructure risk analysis model. J Infrastructure Syst ASCE 6(3):114鈥?17 CrossRef
    13. Fares H, Zayed T (2010) Hierarchical fuzzy expert system for risk of failure of water mains. J Pipeline Syst Eng Pract 1(1):53鈥?2 CrossRef
    14. Federal Emergency Management America (FEMA) (2003) Primer for design of commercial buildings to mitigate terrorist attacks. Risk Management Series
    15. Haestad M, Walski TM, Chase DV, Savic DA, Grayman W, Backwith S, Koelle E (2003) Advanced water distribution modeling and management. Haestad Press, Waterbury
    16. Huang C (2009) Integration degree of risk in terms of scene and application. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 23:473鈥?84 CrossRef
    17. Huipeng L (2007) Hierarchical risk assessment of water supply systems. PhD Thesis, Loughborough University
    18. Ishizuka M, Fu KS, Yao JTP (1982) Inference procedures and uncertainty for the problem-reduction method. J Inform Sci 28(3):179鈥?06 CrossRef
    19. IWA (2004) The Bonn Charter for Safe Drinking Water, http://www.iwahq.org/cm. International Water Association
    20. Kaplan S (1997) The words of risk analysis. J Risk Anal 17(4):407鈥?17 CrossRef
    21. Kosko B (1986) Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int J Man Machine Stud 24(1):65鈥?5 CrossRef
    22. Lee CC (1990) Fuzzy logic in control systems: fuzzy logic controller, Part I and II. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 20(2):404鈥?35 CrossRef
    23. Lee HM (1996) Applying fuzzy set theory to evaluate the rate of aggregative risk in software development. Int J Fuzzy Sets Syst 79(3):323鈥?36 CrossRef
    24. Lee HK, Yeh YY, Chen WM (2006) Cancer risk analysis and assessment of trihalomethanes in drinking water. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 21(1):1鈥?3 CrossRef
    25. Lee M, McBean E, Ghazali M, Schuster C, Huang J (2009) Fuzzy-logic modeling of risk assessment for a small drinking-water supply system. J Water Resour Plan Manag 135(6):547鈥?52 CrossRef
    26. Li YP, Huang GH, Yang ZF, Nie SL (2008) IFMP: interval-fuzzy multistage programming for water resources management under uncertainty. Resour Conserv Recycl 52(5):800鈥?12 CrossRef
    27. Lindhe A, Ros茅n L, Norberg T, Bergstedt O (2009) Fault tree analysis for integrated and probabilistic risk analysis of drinking water systems. J Water Res 43(6):1641鈥?653 CrossRef
    28. Linstone HA, Turoff M (1975) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Adison-Wesley, Reading, ISBN 9780201042948
    29. Lu HW, Huang GH, Zeng GM, Maqsood I, He L (2008) An inexact two-stage fuzzy-stochastic programming model for water resources management. Water Resour Manag 22(8):991鈥?016 CrossRef
    30. Lund JR (2002) Floodplain planning with risk-based optimization. J Water Resour Plann Manag 128(3):202鈥?07
    31. Mays LW (2004) Urban water supply management tools. McGraw-Hill Engineering Reference, New York
    32. Ostfeld A (2001) Reliability analysis of regional water distribution systems. J Urban Water 3(4):253鈥?60 CrossRef
    33. Qin XS (2012) Assessing environmental risks through fuzzy parameterized probabilistic analysis. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 26:43鈥?8 CrossRef
    34. Rahman S, Zayed T (2009) Condition assessment of water treatment plant components. J Perform Constr Facil 23(4):276鈥?87 CrossRef
    35. Rausand M, H酶yland A (2004) System reliability theory. Models, statistical methods, and applications. Wiley, New Jersey
    36. Sachs T, Tiong R (2009) Quantifying qualitative information on risks: development of the QQIR method. J Constr Eng Manag 135(1):56鈥?1 CrossRef
    37. Sadiq R, Kleiner Y, Rajani B (2004) Aggregative risk analysis for water quality failure in distribution networks. J Water Supply Res Technol 53(4):241鈥?61
    38. Sadiq R, Rodriguez MG, Imran SA, Najjaran H (2007a) Communicating human health risks associated with disinfection by-products in drinking water supplies: a fuzzy-based approach. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 21:341鈥?51 CrossRef
    39. Sadiq R, Kleiner Y, Rajani B (2007b) Water quality failures in distribution networks鈥攔isk analysis using fuzzy logic and evidential reasoning. J Risk Anal 27(5):1381鈥?394 CrossRef
    40. Salas JD, Fu C, Cancelliers A, Dustin D, Bode D, Pineda A, Vincent E (2005) Characterizing the severity and risk of drought in the Poudre River, Colorado. J Water Resour Plan Manag 131(5):383鈥?93 CrossRef
    41. Shafer G (1976) A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton
    42. Tesfamariam S, Sadiq R (2006) Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP). Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 21:35鈥?0 CrossRef
    43. Tidwell VC, Cooper JA, Silva CJ (2005) Threat assessment of water supply systems using markov latent effects modeling. J Water Resour Plan Manag 131(3):218鈥?27 CrossRef
    44. Torres J, Brumbelow K, Guikema S (2009) Risk classification and uncertainty propagation for virtual water distribution systems. J Reliab Eng Syst Safety 94(8):1259鈥?273 CrossRef
    45. Vairavamoorthy K, Yan J, Gagale HM, Gorantiwar SD (2007) IRA-WDS: a GIS-based risk analysis tool for water distribution systems. J Environ Model Softw 22(7):951鈥?65 CrossRef
    46. Weiler K, Walter MT, Walter MF et al (2000) Seasonal risk analysis for floodplains in the Delaware River Basin. J Water Resour Plan Manag 125(5):320鈥?29 CrossRef
    47. World Health Organization (WHO) (2004) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 3rd edn
    48. Yager RR (2004) On the determination of strength of belief for decision support under uncertainty鈥擯art II: fusing strengths of belief. Int J Fuzzy Sets Syst 142(1):129鈥?42 CrossRef
    49. Yetton P, Bottger P (1983) The relationships among group size, member ability, social decision schemes, and performance. J Organ Behav Human Perform 32(2):145鈥?59 CrossRef
    50. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. J Inf Control 8(3):129鈥?42
  • 作者单位:Abbas Roozbahani (1) (2)
    Banafsheh Zahraie (3)
    Massoud Tabesh (3)

    1. School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
    2. National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
    3. Center of Excellence for Infrastructures Engineering and Management, School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
  • ISSN:1436-3259
文摘
Urban water supply systems (UWSS) are generally composed of water sources, transmission pipes, treatment plants, and distribution networks from source to tap and usually are exposed to variety of uncertain threatening hazards. These threats can be divided to three main groups of natural, human-made, and operational hazards which affect either water quantity or water quality. In order to evaluate the reliability of water supply systems, risk assessment tools must be used to identify threats, their probability, and consequences and vulnerabilities of each element of these systems against the hazards. Due to the complexity and uncertainties affecting water supply systems and threatening hazards, a comprehensive and effective risk assessment method is required. In this study, an integrated fuzzy hierarchical risk assessment model for water supply systems (IFHRA-WSS) is proposed to assess hazards in a complex UWSS using a systematic approach incorporating both water quantity and quality issues. This model uses a hierarchical framework for breaking down the UWSS infrastructures to their interrelated elements to reduce the overall complexity of the system. It also considers uncertainties using Fuzzy Logic approach. Effects of functional interdependencies between different components of the system have also been considered in the vulnerability analysis. IFHRA-WSS incorporates the contributions of urban water experts in a group risk assessment procedure in a way that they can be easily expressed in terms of the qualitative and quantitative risk measures. Efficiency of this model has been examined in a case study which includes a large part of a drinking water supply system in a major city in Iran. This system includes all the elements of the UWSS from the delivery point to the consumption point. In the case study, different components and subcomponents of this system have been ranked based on their estimated risk values. It is envisaged that the results of the proposed model can help the decision makers to plan for effective risk mitigation measures.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700