Fusion rate according to mixture ratio and volumes of bone graft in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: minimum 2-year follow-up

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jae-Sung Yoo ; Sang-Hyuk Min ; Sung-Hyun Yoon
• 关键词：Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion ; Minimally invasive procedure ; Bone graft ; Fusion rate ; Hydroxyapatite
• 刊名：European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：July 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：25
• 期：1-supp
• 页码：183-189
• 全文大小：557 KB
• 参考文献：1.Dhall SS, Wang MY, Mummaneni PV (2008) Clinical and radiographic comparison of mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in 42 patients with long-term follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 9(6):560–565. doi:10.​3171/​SPI.​2008.​9.​08142 PubMed CrossRef
  2.Isaacs RE, Podichetty VK, Santiago P, Sandhu FA, Spears J, Kelly K, Rice L, Fessler RG (2005) Minimally invasive microendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with instrumentation. J Neurosurg Spine 3(2):98–105. doi:10.​3171/​spi.​2005.​3.​2.​0098 PubMed CrossRef
  3.Mummaneni PV, Rodts GE, Jr (2005) The mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 57(4):256–261 discussion 256–261PubMed CrossRef
  4.Park P, Foley KT (2008) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Neurosurg Focus 25(2):E16. doi:10.​3171/​FOC/​2008/​25/​8/​E16 PubMed CrossRef
  5.Park Y, Ha JW, Lee YT, Sung NY (2011) The effect of a radiographic solid fusion on clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 11(3):205–212PubMed CrossRef
  6.Aspenberg P, Albrektsson T, Thorngren KG (1989) Local application of growth-factor IGF-1 to healing bone. Experiments with a titanium chamber in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 60(5):607–610. doi:10.​3109/​1745367890915013​2 PubMed CrossRef
  7.Cook SD, Dalton JE, Prewett AB, Whitecloud TS, 3rd (1995) In vivo evaluation of demineralized bone matrix as a bone graft substitute for posterior spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20 (8):877–886. doi:10.​1097/​00007632-199504150-00002
  8.Cook SD, Dalton JE, Tan EH, Whitecloud TS, 3rd, Rueger DC (1994) In vivo evaluation of recombinant human osteogenic protein (rhOP-1) implants as a bone graft substitute for spinal fusions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19 (15):1655–1663. doi:10.​1097/​00007632-199408000-00002
  9.Louis-Ugbo J, Murakami H, Kim HS, Minamide A, Boden SD (2004) Evidence of osteoinduction by Grafton demineralized bone matrix in nonhuman primate spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(4):360–366 discussion Z361CrossRef
  10.Martin GJ, Jr, Boden SD, Titus L, Scarborough NL (1999) New formulations of demineralized bone matrix as a more effective graft alternative in experimental posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(7):637–645CrossRef
  11.Choi DJAD, Lee SL et al (2008) The effect of demineralized bone matrix as a graft enhancer in posterior lumbar interbody fusion using cage and local bone chips. J Korean Soc Spine Surg 15(3):97. doi:10.​4184/​jkss.​2008.​15.​3.​157 CrossRef
  12.Spivak JM, Hasharoni A (2001) Use of hydroxyapatite in spine surgery. Eur Spine J 10(Suppl 2):S197–S204. doi:10.​1007/​s005860100286 PubMedCentral PubMed CrossRef
  13.Chung JMCB, Lee CK, Lee JH et al (2009) Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using hydroxyapatite block—comparison with metal and PEEK cages. J Korean Soc Spine Surg 16(4):7. doi:10.​4184/​jkss.​2009.​16.​4.​243
  14.Burkus JK, Foley K, Haid RW, LeHuec JC (2001) Surgical Interbody Research Group—radiographic assessment of interbody fusion devices: fusion criteria for anterior lumbar interbody surgery. Neurosurg Focus 10(4):E11PubMed CrossRef
  15.Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD (2003) Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 (15 Suppl):S26–35. doi:10.​1097/​01.​BRS.​0000076895.​52418.​5E
  16.Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, Foley KT (2005) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(Suppl):S1–S6PubMed CrossRef
  17.Thalgott JS, Giuffre JM, Fritts K, Timlin M, Klezl Z (2001) Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion using coralline hydroxyapatite with or without demineralized bone matrix, as an adjunct to autologous bone. Spine J 1(2):131–137PubMed CrossRef
  18.Hwang CJBJ, Koo KH, Lee JH, Yeom JS, Chang BS, Lee CK (2007) A comparative experimental study of allograft and porous hydroxyapatite as bone substitutes. J Korean Orthop Assoc 42:7. doi:10.​4055/​jkoa.​2007.​42.​4.​545
  19.Finkemeier CG (2002) Bone-grafting and bone-graft substitutes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(3):454–464. doi:10.​3923/​javaa.​2010.​1055.​1067
  20.Sartoris DJ, Gershuni DH, Akeson WH, Holmes RE, Resnick D (1986) Coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitutes: preliminary report of radiographic evaluation. Radiology 159(1):133–137. doi:10.​1016/​S1067-2516(96)80058-5 PubMed CrossRef
  21.Cheng USKD, Cho JL et al (2008) Comparison of the effect of hydroxyapatite and allogeneous bone as an adjunct to autogenous iliac bone grafting in posterolateral spinal fusion. J Korean Orthop Assoc 43:5CrossRef
  22.Kang HJKT, Kweon SH et al (2011) The usefulness of hydroxyapatite bone transposition in treatment of metaphyseal fracture with bone defect. J Korean Musculoskelet Transpl Soc 11(1):5
  23.Korovessis P, Koureas G, Zacharatos S, Papazisis Z, Lambiris E (2005) Correlative radiological, self-assessment and clinical analysis of evolution in instrumented dorsal and lateral fusion for degenerative lumbar spine disease. Autograft versus coralline hydroxyapatite. Eur Spine J 14(7):630–638. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-004-0855-5 PubMedCentral PubMed CrossRef
  24.Bucholz RW (2002) Nonallograft osteoconductive bone graft substitutes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 395:44–52PubMed CrossRef
  25.Boden SD, Martin GJ, Jr., Morone M, Ugbo JL, Titus L, Hutton WC (1999) The use of coralline hydroxyapatite with bone marrow, autogenous bone graft, or osteoinductive bone protein extract for posterolateral lumbar spine fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(4):320–327
  26.Karabekir HS, Gocmen-Mas N, Edizer M, Ertekin T, Yazici C, Atamturk D (2011) Lumbar vertebra morphometry and stereological assesment of intervertebral space volumetry: a methodological study. Ann Anat 193(3):231–236. doi:10.​1016/​j.​aanat.​2011.​01.​011 PubMed CrossRef
  27.Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Elfering A, Hodler J, Boos N (2006) Effect of aging and degeneration on disc volume and shape: a quantitative study in asymptomatic volunteers. J Orthop Res 24(5):1086–1094. doi:10.​1002/​jor.​20113 PubMed CrossRef
  28.Riouallon G, Lachaniette CH, Poignard A, Allain J (2013) Outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion in low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults: a continuous series of 65 cases with an average follow-up of 6.6 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(2):155–161. doi:10.​1016/​j.​otsr.​2012.​12.​009 PubMed CrossRef
  29.Zairi F, Arikat A, Allaoui M, Assaker R (2013) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: comparison between open and mini-open approaches with two years follow-up. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 74(3):131–135. doi:10.​1055/​s-0032-1330956 PubMed CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Jae-Sung Yoo (1)
  Sang-Hyuk Min (1)
  Sung-Hyun Yoon (1)
  
  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, 16-5 Anseo-dong, Cheonan, 330-715, Korea
  
• 刊物类别：Medicine
• 刊物主题：Medicine & Public Health
  Surgical Orthopedics
  Traumatic Surgery
  
• 出版者：Springer Paris
• ISSN：1432-1068

文摘

Objectives Hydroxyapatite (HA) is commonly used as bone substitute in clinical practices. However, only few studies have compared the relationship between the mixture ratio of bone graft in the actual clinical field and fusion rate according to bone graft volume. The study aimed to analyze the fusion rate according to the mixture ratio and the amount of bone graft in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF).