Event-based proactive interference in rhesus monkeys

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Deepna T. Devkar ; Anthony A. Wright
• 关键词：Proactive interference ; Visual working memory ; Same/different ; Long ; term memory ; Monkeys
• 刊名：Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：October 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：23
• 期：5
• 页码：1474-1482
• 全文大小：779 KB
• 刊物主题：Cognitive Psychology;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：1531-5320
• 卷排序：23

文摘

Three rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) were tested in a same/different memory task for proactive interference (PI) from prior trials. PI occurs when a previous sample stimulus appears as a test stimulus on a later trial, does not match the current sample stimulus, and the wrong response “same” is made. Trial-unique pictures (scenes, objects, animals, etc.) were used on most trials, except on trials where the test stimulus matched potentially interfering sample stimulus from a prior trial (1, 2, 4, 8, or 16 trials prior). Greater interference occurred when fewer trials separated interference and test. PI functions showed a continuum of interference. Delays between sample and test stimuli and intertrial intervals were manipulated to test how PI might vary as a function of elapsed time. Contrary to a similar study with pigeons, these time manipulations had no discernable effect on the monkey’s PI, as shown by compete overlap of PI functions with no statistical differences or interactions. These results suggested that interference was strictly based upon the number of intervening events (trials with other pictures) without regard to elapsed time. The monkeys’ apparent event-based interference was further supported by retesting with a novel set of 1,024 pictures. PI from novel pictures 1 or 2 trials prior was greater than from familiar pictures, a familiar set of 1,024 pictures. Moreover, when potentially interfering novel stimuli were 16 trials prior, performance accuracy was actually greater than accuracy on baseline trials (no interference), suggesting that remembering stimuli from 16 trials prior was a cue that this stimulus was not the sample stimulus on the current trial—a somewhat surprising conclusion particularly given monkeys.