Ecosystem service tradeoff between traditional and modern agriculture: a case study in Congjiang County, Guizhou Province, China
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Dan Zhang (1) (2)
Qingwen Min (1)
Moucheng Liu (1)
Shengkui Cheng (1) - 关键词：traditional agriculture ; rice ; fish agriculture ; rice monoculture ; benefit and cost analysis (BCA) ; ecosystem services (ES) ; ecosystem dis ; services (EDS)
- 刊名：Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering
- 出版年：2012
- 出版时间：October 2012
- 年：2012
- 卷：6
- 期：5
- 页码：743-752
- 全文大小：195KB
- 参考文献：1. Pimentel D, Acquay H, Biltonen M, Rice P, Silva M, Nelson J, Lipner V, Giordano S, Horowitz A, D’Amore M. Environmental and economic costs of pesticide use. BioScience, 1992, 42(10): 750-60 CrossRef
2. Li W H. Agro-Ecological Farming Systems in China. Paris: Parthenon Publishing Group, 2001
3. Qualset C O, Shands H L. Safeguarding the Future of US Agriculture: The Need to Conserve Threatened Collections of Crop Diversity Worldwide. University of California Genetic Resources Conservation Program, 2005
4. Zhu Y Y, Chen H R, Fan J H, Wang Y Y, Li Y, Chen J B, Fan J X, Yang S S, Hu L P, Leung H, Mew TW, Teng P S, Wang Z H, Mundt C C. Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature, 2000, 406(6797): 718-22 CrossRef
5. Leung H, Zhu Y Y, Revilla-Molina I R, Fan J X, Chen H, Pangga I, Cruz C V, Mew TW. Using genetic diversity to achieve sustainable rice diseases management. Plant Disease, 2003, 87(10): 1156-169 CrossRef
6. Jackson L E, Ramirez I, Yokota R, Fennimore S A, Koike S T, Henderson D M, Chaney W E, Calderó F J, Klonsky K. On-farm assessment of organic matter and tillage management on vegetable yield, soil, weeds, pests, and economics in California. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2004, 103(3): 443-63 CrossRef
7. Vandermeer J, Lawrence D, Symstad A, Hobbie S. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning in managed ecosystems. In: Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, eds. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives. UK: Oxford University Press, 2002, 221-36
8. Altieri M A, Nicholls C I. Soil fertility management and insect pests: harmonizing soil and plant health in agroecosystems. Soil & Tillage Research, 2003, 72(2): 203-11 CrossRef
9. Tscharntke T, Klein A M, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecology Letters, 2005, 8(8): 857-74 CrossRef
10. Drinkwater L E, Wagoner P, Sarrantonio M. Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses. Nature, 1998, 396: 262-65 CrossRef
11. Li L, Tang C, Rengel Z, Zhang F S. Calcium, magnesium and microelement uptake as affected by phosphorus sources and interspecific root interactions between wheat and chickpea. Plant and Soil, 2004, 261: 29-7 CrossRef
12. Li SM, Li L, Zhang F S, Tang C. Acid phosphatase role in chickpea/maize intercropping. Annals of Botany, 2004, 94(2): 297-03 CrossRef
13. FAO. Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) pilot systems and sites
14. http://www.fao.org/nr/giahs/pilot-systems/en/, 2009-5-27
15. Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill R V, Paruelo J, Raskin R G, Sutton P, van den Belt M. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-60 CrossRef
16. Daily G C, S?derqvist T, Aniyar S, Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Ehrlich P R, Folke C, Jansson A, Jansson B O, Kautsky N, Levin S, Lubchenco J, M?ler K G, Simpson D, Starrett D, Tilman D, Walker B. The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 2000, 289: 395-96 CrossRef
17. He H, Pan Y Z, Zhu W Q, Liu X L, Zhang Q, Zhu X F. Measurement of terrestrial ecosystem service value in China. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(6): 1122-127 (in Chinese)
18. Hougner C, Colding J, S?derqvist T. Economic valuation of a seed dispersal service in the Stockholm National Urban Park, Sweden. Ecological Economics, 2006, 59(3): 364-74 CrossRef
19. Brander L, van Beukering P, Cesar H S J. The recreational value of coral reefs: a meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 2007, 63(1): 209-18 CrossRef
20. Costanza R, Fisher B, Mulder K, Liu S, Christopher T. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multi-scale empirical study of the relationship between species richness and net primary production. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(2-): 478-91 CrossRef
21. Sattout E J, Talhouk S N, Caligari P D S. Economic value of cedar relics in Lebanon: an application of contingent valuation method for conservation. Ecological Economics, 2007, 61(2-): 315-22 CrossRef
22. Sandhu H S, Wratten S D, Cullen R, Case B. The future of farming: The value of ecosystem services in conventional and organic arable land. An experimental approach. Ecological Economics, 2008, 64(4): 835-48 CrossRef
23. Swinton S M, Lupi F, Robertson G P, Hamilton S K. Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecological Economics, 2007, 64(2): 245-52 CrossRef
24. Fleming C M, Cook A. The recreational value of Lake Mckenzie, Fraser Island: an application of the travel cost method. Tourism Management, 2008, 29(6): 1197-205 CrossRef
25. Zhang W, Ricketts T H, Kremen C, Carney K, Swinton S M. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecological Economics, 2007, 64(2): 253-60 CrossRef
26. Assessment M E. Ecosystems and HumanWell-being: a Framework for Assessment. Washington DC: Island Press, 2003
27. Way M J, Heong K L. The role of biodiversity in the dynamics and management of insect pests of tropical irrigated rice-a review. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 1994, 84(04): 567-87 CrossRef
28. Berg H. Pesticide use in rice and rice-fish farms in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Crop Protection (Guildford, Surrey), 2001, 20(10): 897-05 CrossRef
29. Lu B Y, Wang R S, Zhang R W. Relationship between population’s diversity and its micro-environments in farmland ecosystemevaluation for diversity of several farm-lands ecosystems. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2001, 20(2): 5- (in Chinese)
30. Zheng Z X, Min Q W. Organic agriculture: a new opportunity for rice-fish agriculture development. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2006, 22: 299-02 (in Chinese)
31. de Groot R S, Wilson M, Boumans R M J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 2002, 41(3): 393-08 CrossRef
32. Antle J M, Pingali P L. Pesticides, productivity, and farmer health: a Philippines case study. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1994, 76(3): 418-30 CrossRef
33. Wilson M, Troy M, Costanza R. The economic geography of ecosystem goods and services: revealing the monetary value of landscapes through transfer methods and geographic informantion systems. In: Dieterich M, van der Straaten J, eds. Cultural Landscapes and Land Use: The Nature Conservation-Society Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004, 69-4 CrossRef
34. Xiao Y. Study on the ecosystem services by the rice paddies in China and their monetary values. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, 2005 (in Chinese)
35. Ball B C, Scott A, Parker J P. Field N2O, CO2 and CH4 fluxes in relation to tillage, compaction and soil quality in Scotland. Soil & Tillage Research, 1999, 53(1): 29-9 CrossRef
36. Liou R M, Huang S N, Lin C W. Methane emission from fields with differences in nitrogen fertilizers and rice varieties in Taiwan paddy soils. Chemosphere, 2003, 50(2): 237-46 CrossRef
37. Zou J W, Huang Y, Zong L G, Zheng X H. A field study on CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions from rice paddy and impact factors. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2003, 23(6): 758-64 (in Chinese)
38. Yang S S, Chang H L. Effect of environmental conditions on methane production and emission from paddy soil. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 1998, 69(1): 69-0 CrossRef
39. Liu X Y, Huang H, Yang Z P, Yu J B, Dai Z Y, Wang D J, Tan S Q. Methane emission from rice-duck-fish complex ecosystem. Ecology & Environment, 2006, 15(2): 265-69 (in Chinese)
40. Ren W L, Cao C G, Wang J P. Economic valuation of gas regulation as a service by rice-duck-fish complex ecosystem. Ecological Economy, 2008, (4): 266-72
41. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency of US. Office of Atmospheric Programs. Inventory of US Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-000, 2002, EPA 430-R-02-003
42. Houghton J T, Meira Filho L G, Callander B A, Harris N. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996
43. Bj?rklund J, Limburg K E, Rydberg T. Impact of production intensity on the ability of the agricultural landscape to generate ecosystem services: an example from Sweden. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29(2): 269-91 CrossRef
44. Ghosh S, Majumdar D, Jain M C. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from an irrigated rice of North India. Chemosphere, 2003, 51(3): 181-95 CrossRef
45. MFC (Ministry of Forestry of China). Yearbook of Forestry in China. Beijing: Forestry Press, 1990 (in Chinese)
46. Mao Q L. Yuecheng reservoir project financial assessment and computation on water price. Journal of Economics of Water Resources, 1998, 33(6):16-7 (in Chinese)
47. Li W H, Liu M C, Zhang D. Tradeoff analysis on comprehensive valuation of traditional agriculture and rice monocropping in Zhejiang. Resources Science, 2009, 31(6): 899-04 (in Chinese)
48. Yoshida K. An economic evaluation of the multifunctional roles of agriculture and rural areas in Japan. Technical bulletin, 2001
49. Zeng H C. SO2 pollution of coal power in city and their management technology. Central China Electric Power, 1998, 11(4): 14-9 (in Chinese)
50. Shrestha R K, Seidl A F, Moraes A S. Value of recreational fishing in the Brazilian Pantanal: a travel cost analysis using count data models. Ecological Economics, 2002, 42(1-): 289-99 CrossRef
51. Zheng W, Shi H H, Chen S, Zhu M Y. Benefit and cost analysis of mariculture based on ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68(6): 1626-632 CrossRef
52. Chestnut L G, Mills D M. A fresh look at the benefits and costs of the US acid rain program. Journal of Environmental Management, 2005, 77(3): 252-66 CrossRef
53. Spurgeo J. The socio-economic costs and benefits of coastal habitat rehabilitation and creation. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 1998, 37(8-2): 373-82
54. Dale V H, Polasky S. Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 2007, 64(2): 286-96 CrossRef - 作者单位：Dan Zhang (1) (2)
Qingwen Min (1)
Moucheng Liu (1)
Shengkui Cheng (1)
1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
2. Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China - ISSN：2095-221X
文摘
Besides crops, agriculture supplies all three major categories of ecosystem services (ES). However, agriculture also supplies an array of ecosystem dis-services (EDS) that may harm other ecosystems. The flows of ES and EDS are directly dependent on the management of agricultural ecosystems. The traditional method of Chinese agriculture, which supports sustainable agriculture, has been proven to increase ES and reduce EDS. However, there is a lack of a detailed understanding of the ES and EDS associated with traditional agriculture, and also of differences between traditional and modern agriculture. In this study, an investigation was conducted on the ecosystem services (ES) and ecosystem dis-services (EDS) of traditional and modern agriculture in Congjiang County, Guizhou Province, China. Afterwards, the economic values of ES and EDS were quantified experimentally and calculated based on the market price. The results show that: the net economic value of traditional rice-fish agriculture was 3.31×104 CNY·ha? (6.83 CNY = 1 USD as of July, 2009) and that of rice monoculture was 1.99×104 CNY·ha?. Significant differences existed between traditional rice-fish and rice monoculture fields for their economic values of some ES or EDS. A benefit and cost analysis (BCA) model was used to adjust the conflict between the economic income and environmental loss from traditional and modern agriculture. The BCA model not only calculates the net income but also monetizes the EDS of the agricultural systems. The results showed that the net income of rice-fish agriculture was 1.94×104 CNY·ha? higher than that of rice monoculture. However, the benefit to cost ratio (BCR) of rice-fish agriculture was lower than that of rice monoculture, indicating that the traditional agricultural model was not the most optimized choice for farmers. The value of the rice-fish agriculture was much higher than that of the rice monoculture. Thus, when considering the benefits that rice-fish agriculture contributes to the largescale society, these agricultural methods needs to be utilized. Furthermore, the labor opportunity costs were calculated and the comprehensive value of rice monoculture was negative. Finally, the compensation standard was calculated based on the comprehensive benefit analysis. The lowest level was 1.09×103 CNY·ha?, and the highest level was 1.21×104 CNY·ha?.