Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with full versus partial thickness cartilage loss (PTCL): equal in clinical outcome but with higher reoperation rate for patients with PTCL

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Michael W. Maier ; Felix Kuhs…
• 关键词：Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty ; Medial oxford knee ; Indication ; Survival rate ; Clinical outcome ; Oxford Knee Score ; Partial thickness cartilage loss ; Bone on bone ; Full thickness cartilage loss
• 刊名：Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：August 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：135
• 期：8
• 页码：1169-1175
• 全文大小：746 KB
• 参考文献：1.Price AJ, Waite JC, Svard U (2005) Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:171-80PubMed View Article
  2.Newman J, Pydisetty RV, Ackroyd C (2009) Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 91(1):52-7View Article
  3.Manzotti A, Confalonieri N, Pullen C (2007) Unicompartmental versus computer-assisted total knee replacement for medial compartment knee arthritis: a matched paired study. Int Orthop 31(3):315-19PubMed Central PubMed View Article
  4.Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a 10-year survival study. Bone Joint J 80(6):983-89View Article
  5.Pandit H et al (2011) Unicompartmental knee replacement for patients with partial thickness cartilage loss in the affected compartment. Knee 18(3):168-71PubMed View Article
  6.Niinimaki TT et al (2011) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties implanted for osteoarthritis with partial loss of joint space have high re-operation rates. Knee 18(6):432-35PubMed View Article
  7.Dawson J et al (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. Bone Joint J 80(1):63-9View Article
  8.Insall JN et al (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13-4PubMed
  9.Murray DW et al (2007) The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. Bone Joint J 89(8):1010-014View Article
  10.Price AJ, Svard U (2011) A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(1):174-79PubMed Central PubMed View Article
  11.White SH, Ludkowski PF, Goodfellow JW (1991) Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. Bone Joint J 73(4):582-86
  12.Aldinger PR et al (2004) Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the “Oxford Uni-meniscal bearing knee. Der Orthopade 33(11):1277-283PubMed View Article
  13.Mukherjee K et al (2008) The Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiological perspective. Clin Radiol 63(10):1169-176PubMed View Article
  14.Gibson PH, Goodfellow JW (1986) Stress radiography in degenerative arthritis of the knee. Bone Joint J 68(4):608-09
  
• 作者单位：Michael W. Maier (1)
  Felix Kuhs (1)
  Marcus R. Streit (1)
  Peter Schuhmacher (1)
  Tilman Walker (1)
  Volker Ewerbeck (1)
  Tobias Gotterbarm (1)
  
  1. Clinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Schlierbacher Landstrasse 200a, 69118, Heidelberg, Germany
  
• 刊物类别：Medicine
• 刊物主题：Medicine & Public Health
  Orthopedics
  
• 出版者：Springer Berlin / Heidelberg
• ISSN：1434-3916

文摘

Purpose While the classical indications and contraindications for unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) are widely accepted there is not yet consensus if patients with partial thickness cartilage loss (PTCL) are equally suited for treatment with UKA. The aim of our study was to determine if patients with partial thickness cartilage loss do equally well after treatment with UKA. Methods The study retrospectively analyzed the clinical results as well as the survival rates of 64 patients treated with UKA with the medial Oxford knee system. 32 patients had shown PTCL on preoperative radiographs, while the matched control group presented with full thickness cartilage loss (FTCL) medially. Outcome parameters were the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the American Knee Society Score (AKS), and radiographic analysis. Results Postoperative improvement in OKS was 16 (SD 9.0) for patients with PTCL and 17 (SD 8.1) for patients with FTCL. There were no significant differences in the clinical scores between the two groups. Five Patients with PTCL had reoperation whereas there were only two in the bone on bone group. Cumulative survival at 5?years for all revisions was 84?% (95?% CI 72-2?%) for the PTCL group and 97?% (95?% CI 92-00?%) for the FTCL group. This difference was not yet significant (log rank: p?=?0.095). Conclusions Patients with PTCL are not equally suited for treatment with UKA like patients with bone on bone. Although PTCL has equal clinical results, it was associated with higher revision rates in our series.