Granuloma debridement and the use of an injectable calcium phosphate bone cement in the treatment of osteolysis in an uncemented total knee replacement

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Henry D Atkinson (1) (2)
  Vijai S Ranawat (1) (2)
  Roger D Oakeshott (2)
  
• 刊名：Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
• 出版年：2010
• 出版时间：December 2010
• 年：2010
• 卷：5
• 期：1
• 全文大小：1017KB
• 参考文献：1. Maloney WJ, Herzwurm P, Paprosky W, Rubash HE, Engh C: Treatment of pelvic osteolysis associated with a stable acetabular component inserted without cement as part of a total hip replacement. / J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997, 79:1628鈥?4.
  2. Maloney WJ, Paprosky W, Engh CA, Rubash H: Surgical treatment of pelvic osteolysis. / Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 393:78鈥?4. CrossRef
  3. Rubash HE, Sinha RK, Maloney WJ, Paprosky WG: Osteolysis: Surgical treatment. / Instr Course Lect 1998, 47:321鈥?.
  4. Maloney WJ: The surgical management of femoral osteolysis. / J Arthroplasty 2005,20(4 suppl 2):75鈥?. CrossRef
  5. O'Brien JJ, Burnett RS, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH: Isolated liner exchange in revision total hip arthroplasty: Clinical results using the direct lateral approach. / J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:414鈥?3. CrossRef
  6. Terefenko KM, Sychterz CJ, Orishimo K, Engh CA: Polyethylene liner exchange for excessive wear and osteolysis. / J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:798鈥?04. CrossRef
  7. Benson ER, Christensen CP, Monesmith EA, Gomes SL, Bierbaum BE: Particulate bone grafting of osteolytic femoral lesions around stable cementless stems. / Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000, 381:58鈥?7. CrossRef
  8. Maloney W, Rosenberg A: What is the outcome of treatment for osteolysis? / J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008,16(Suppl 1):S26鈥?2.
  9. Backstein D, Safir O, Gross A: Management of bone loss: Structural grafts in revision total knee arthroplasty. / Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 446:104鈥?2. CrossRef
  10. Engh GA, Herzwurm PJ, Parks NL: Treatment of major defects of bone with bulk allografts and stemmed components during total knee arthroplasty. / J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1997, 79:1030鈥?.
  11. Fehring TK, Odum S, Olekson C, Griffin WL, Mason JB, McCoy TH: Stem fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: A comparative analysis. / Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 416:217鈥?4. CrossRef
  12. Griffin WL, Scott RD, Dalury DF, Mahoney OM, Chiavetta JB, Odum SM: Modular insert exchange in knee arthroplasty for treatment of wear and osteolysis. / Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 464:132鈥?.
  13. Jensen CL, Petersen MM, Jensen KE, Therbo M, Schr酶der HM: Outcome of isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange after uncemented total knee arthroplasty: 27 patients followed for 8鈥?1 months. / Acta Orthop 2006, 77:917鈥?0. CrossRef
  14. Gupta SK, Chu A, Ranawat AS, Slamin J, Ranawat CS: Osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty. / J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:787鈥?9. CrossRef
  15. Pals SD, Wilkins RM: Giant cell tumor of bone treated by curettage, cementation, and bone grafting. / Orthopedics 1992, 15:703鈥?.
  16. O'Donnell RJ, Springfield DS, Motwani HK, Ready JE, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ: Recurrence of giant-cell tumors of the long bones after curettage and packing with cement. / J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994, 76:1827鈥?3.
  17. Persson BM, Wouters HW: Curettage and acrylic cementation in surgery of giant cell tumors of bone. / Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976, 120:125鈥?3.
  18. Persson BM, Ekelund L, Lovedahl R, Gunterberg B: Favourable results of acrylic cementation for giant cell tumors. / Acta Orthop Scand 1984, 55:209鈥?4. CrossRef
  19. Ahmed I, Logan M, Alipour F, Dashti H, Hadden WA: Autogenous bone grafting of uncontained bony defects of tibia during total knee arthroplasty a 10-year follow up. / J Arthroplasty 2008,23(5):744鈥?0. CrossRef
  20. Steens W, Loehr JF, Wodtke J, Katzer A: Morselized bone grafting in revision arthroplasty of the knee: a retrospective analysis of 34 reconstructions after 2鈥? years. / Acta Orthop 2008,79(5):683鈥?. CrossRef
  21. Larsson S: Cement augmentation in fracture treatment. / Scand J Surg 2006, 95:111鈥?.
  22. Yetkinler DN, Goodman SB, Reindel ES, Carter D, Poser RD, Constantz BR: Mechanical evaluation of a carbonated apatite cement in the fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. / Acta Orthop Scand 2002,73(2):157鈥?4. CrossRef
  23. Yetkinler DN, Ladd AL, Poser RD, Constantz BR, Carter D: Biomechanical evaluation of fixation of intra-articular fractures of the distal part of the radius in cadavera: Kirschner wires compared with calcium-phosphate bone cement. / J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1999,81(3):391鈥?.
  24. Elder S, Frankenburg E, Goulet J, Yetkinler D, Poser R, Goldstein S: Biomechanical evaluation of calcium phosphate cement-augmented fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. / J Orthop Trauma 2000,14(6):386鈥?3. CrossRef
  25. Ogose A, Hotta T, Kawashima H, Kondo N, Gu W, Kamura T, Endo N: Comparison of hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate as bone substitute after excision of bone tumors. / J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005, 72:94鈥?01. CrossRef
  26. Friedman CD, Costantino PD, Takagi S, Chow LC: BoneSource hydroxyapatite cement: a novel biomaterial for craniofacial skeletal tissue engineering and reconstruction. / J Biomed Mater Res 1998,43(4):428鈥?2. CrossRef
  27. LeGeros RZ: Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates. / Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 395:81鈥?8. CrossRef
  28. Vaccaro AR: The role of osteoconductive scaffold in synthetic bone graft. / Orthopedics 2002,25(5 Suppl):S571鈥?.
  29. Shors E, Holmes R: Bone formation in porous hydroxyapatite obtained from human biopsies. / Bioceramics 1993, 6:375鈥?.
  30. Kurashina K, Kurita H, Kotani A, Takeuchi H, Hirano M: In vivo study of a calcium phosphate cement consisting of alpha-tricalcium phosphate/dicalcium phosphate dibasic/tetracalcium phosphate monoxide. / Biomaterials 1997,18(2):147鈥?1. CrossRef
  31. Schindler OS, Cannon SR, Briggs TW, Blunn GW: Composite ceramic bone graft substitute in the treatment of locally aggressive benign bone tumours. / J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2008, 16:66鈥?4.
  32. Gitelis S, Piasecki P, Turner T, Haggard W, Charters J, Urban R: Use of a calcium sulfate-based bone graft substitute for benign bone lesions. / Orthopedics 2001, 24:162鈥?.
  33. Kelly CM, Wilkins RM, Gitelis S, Hartjen C, Watson JT, Kim PT: The use of a surgical grade calcium sulfate as a bone graft substitute: results of a multicenter trial. / Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 382:42鈥?0. CrossRef
  34. Bajammal SS, Zlowodzki M, Lelwica A, Tornetta P, Einhorn TA, Buckley R, Leighton R, Russell TA, Larsson S, Bhandari M: The use of calcium phosphate bone cement in fracture treatment. A meta-analysis of randomized trials. / J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2008, 90:1186鈥?6. CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Henry D Atkinson (1) (2)
  Vijai S Ranawat (1) (2)
  Roger D Oakeshott (2)
  
  1. Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics and North London Sports Orthopaedics, North Middlesex University Hospital, Sterling Way, London, N18 1QX, UK
  2. Sportsmed SA, 32 Payneham Road, Stepney, Adelaide, 5069, Australia
  

文摘

Polyethylene particulate debris-induced periprosthetic osteolysis is a known complication of knee arthroplasty surgery, and may result in the need for revision surgery. The management of these bony defects can be surgically challenging, and full revisions of well-fixed total knee components can lead to substantial bone loss. We present the case of a 71 year old man who developed knee pain and osteolysis around an uncemented total knee replacement. Due to significant medical comorbidies he was treated by percutaneous cyst granuloma debridement and grafting using an injectable calcium phosphate bone substitute. There were no wound complications, and the patient was allowed to fully weight-bear post-operatively. Histopathology and microbiology of the cyst material confirmed polyethylene granulomata without any evidence of infection. At 6 weeks post-operatively the patient's previous knee pain had resolved, he was able to comfortably fully weight-bear. Preoperative scores (Knee Society Score (KSS) 41, WOMAC score 46.2, and Oxford Knee Score 39) had all improved at the 12-month post-operative review KSS 76, WOMAC 81.7 and Oxford Knee score 21). This is a safe and effective technique with minimal morbidity and may be an appropriate treatment modality when more extensive revision surgery is not possible. The case is discussed with reference to the literature.