用户名: 密码: 验证码:
Imaging differentiation of phytobezoar and small-bowel faeces: CT characteristics with quantitative analysis in patients with small- bowel obstruction
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Ya-Cheng Chen ; Chang-Hsien Liu ; Hsian-He Hsu ; Chih-Yung Yu…
  • 关键词:Phytobezoar ; Small ; bowel obstruction ; Small ; bowel faeces ; Adhesion ; Multi ; detector computed tomography
  • 刊名:European Radiology
  • 出版年:2015
  • 出版时间:April 2015
  • 年:2015
  • 卷:25
  • 期:4
  • 页码:922-931
  • 全文大小:1,902 KB
  • 参考文献:1. Mullen, CP, Siewert, B, Eisenberg, RL (2012) Small bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198: pp. W105-W117 CrossRef
    2. Furukawa, A, Yamasaki, M, Furuichi, K, Yokoyama, K, Nagata, T (2001) Helical CT in the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Radiographics 21: pp. 341-355 CrossRef
    3. Delabrousse, E, Lubrano, J, Jehl, J (2009) Small-bowel obstruction from adhesive bands and matted adhesions: CT differentiation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192: pp. 693-697 CrossRef
    4. Mayo-Smith, WW, Wittenberg, J, Bennett, GL, Gervais, DA, Gazelle, GS, Mueller, PR (1995) The CT small bowel faeces sign: description and clinical relevance. Clin Radiol 50: pp. 765-767 CrossRef
    5. Delabrousse, E, Lubrano, J, Sailley, N, Aubry, S, Mantion, GA, Kastler, BA (2008) Small-bowel bezoar versus small-bowel feces: CT evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191: pp. 1465-1468 CrossRef
    6. Ripolles, T, Garcia-Aguayo, J, Martinez, MJ, Gil, P (2001) Gastrointestinal bezoars: sonographic and CT characteristics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 77: pp. 65-69 CrossRef
    7. Zissin, R, Osadchy, A, Gutman, V, Rathaus, V, Shapiro-Feinberg, M, Gayer, G (2004) CT findings in patients with small bowel obstruction due to phytobezoar. Emerg Radiol 10: pp. 197-200 CrossRef
    8. Yildirim, T, Yildirim, S, Barutcu, O, Oguzkurt, L, Noyan, T (2002) Small bowel obstruction due to phytobezoar: CT diagnosis. Eur Radiol 12: pp. 2659-2661
    9. Lazarus, DE, Slywotsky, C, Bennett, GL, Megibow, AJ, Macari, M (2004) Frequency and relevance of the “small-bowel feces-sign on CT in patients with small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183: pp. 1361-1366 CrossRef
    10. Kim, JH, Ha, HK, Sohn, MJ (2003) CT findings of phytobezoar associated with small bowel obstruction. Eur Radiol 13: pp. 299-304 CrossRef
    11. Silva, AC, Pimenta, M, Guimar?es, LS (2009) Small bowel obstruction: what to look for. Radiographics 29: pp. 423-439 CrossRef
    12. Ko, SF, Lee, TY, Ng, SH (1997) Small bowel obstruction due to phytobezoar: CT diagnosis. Abdom Imaging 22: pp. 471-473 CrossRef
    13. Gayer, G, Jonas, T, Apter, S (1999) Bezoars in the stomach and small bowel—CT appearance. Clin Radiol 54: pp. 228-232 CrossRef
    14. Ho, TW, Koh, DC (2007) Small-bowel obstruction secondary to bezoar impaction: a diagnostic dilemma. World J Surg 31: pp. 1072-1078 CrossRef
    15. Oh, SH, Namgung, H, Park, MH, Park, DG (2012) Bezoar-induced small bowel obstruction. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 28: pp. 89-93 CrossRef
    16. Quiroga, S, Alvarez-Castells, A, Sebastia, MC, Pallisa, E, Barluenga, E (1997) Small bowel obstruction secondary to bezoar: CT diagnosis. Abdom Imaging 22: pp. 315-317 CrossRef
    17. Jacobs, SL, Rozenblit, A, Ricci, Z (2007) Small bowel faeces sign in patients without small bowel obstruction. Clin Radiol 62: pp. 353-357 CrossRef
    18. Chang, WC, Ko, KH, Lin, CS (2014) Features on MDCT that predict surgery in patients with adhesive-related small bowel obstruction. PLoS ONE 9: pp. e89804
文摘
Objective The objective is to use multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) to differentiate phytobezoar impaction and small-bowel faeces in patients with small-bowel obstruction (SBO). Methods We retrospectively reviewed 91 consecutive SBO patients with surgically proven phytobezoars (n--1) or adhesion with small-bowel faeces (n--0). Two readers blinded to the diagnosis recorded the following MDCT features: degree of obstruction, transition point, mesenteric fatty stranding, intraperitoneal fluid, air–fluid level, pneumatosis intestinalis, and portal venous gas. MDCT measurements of the food debris length, attenuation, luminal diameter, and wall thickness of the obstructed bowel were also compared. Results A higher grade of obstruction with an absence of mesenteric fatty stranding and intraperitoneal fluid was more commonly seen in the phytobezoar group than in the small-bowel faeces group (p--.01). The food debris length (phytobezoar, 5.7?±-.8?cm; small-bowel feces, 20.3?±-.9?cm, p--.01) and mean attenuation (phytobezoar, ?9.6?±-3.3 Hounsfield units (HU); small-bowel faeces, 8.5?±-.7 HU, p Conclusions MDCT features with measurements of the food debris length and mean attenuation assist the differentiation of phytobezoar impaction and small-bowel faeces. Key Points -MDCT examination helps to differentiate phytobezoar and small-bowel faeces. -A higher grade of obstruction is commonly associated with phytobezoar impaction. -Mesenteric fatty stranding and intraperitoneal fluid are frequently associated with small-bowel faeces. -Quantitative measurement of the obstructed bowel adds the diagnostic accuracy.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700