Visual processing for action resists similarity of relevant and irrelevant object features

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Markus Janczyk (1)
  Wilfried Kunde (1)
  
• 关键词：Motor control ; Motor planning/programming
• 刊名：Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
• 出版年：2012
• 出版时间：June 2012
• 年：2012
• 卷：19
• 期：3
• 页码：412-417
• 全文大小：166KB
• 参考文献：1. Aglioti, S., DeSouza, J. F. X., & Goodale, M. A. (1995). Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. / Current Biology, 5, 679鈥?85. CrossRef
  2. Bruno, N., & Franz, V. H. (2009). When is grasping affected by the M眉ller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review. / Neuropsychologia, 47, 1421鈥?433. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.031 CrossRef
  3. Carey, D. P. (2001). Do action systems resist visual illusions? / Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 109鈥?13. CrossRef
  4. Dyson, B. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (2010). Decomposing the Garner interference paradigm: Evidence for dissociations between macrolevel and microlevel performance. / Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1676鈥?691. doi:10.3758/APP.72.6.1676 CrossRef
  5. Franz, V. H., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2008). Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation. / Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 920鈥?50. CrossRef
  6. Franz, V. H., Gegenfurtner, K. R., B眉lthoff, H. H., & Fahle, M. (2000). Grasping visual illusions: No evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. / Psychological Science, 11, 20鈥?5. CrossRef
  7. Ganel, T., & Goodale, M. A. (2003). Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape. / Nature, 426, 664鈥?67. doi:10.1038/nature02156 CrossRef
  8. Garner, W. R. (1978). Selective attention to attributes and to stimuli. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 107, 287鈥?08. CrossRef
  9. Gonzalez, C. L. R., Ganel, T., Whitwell, R. L., Morrissey, B., & Goodale, M. A. (2008). Practice makes perfect, but only with the right hand: Sensitivity to perceptual illusions with awkward grasps decreases with practice in the right but not the left hand. / Neuropsychologia, 46, 624鈥?31. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.006 CrossRef
  10. Goodale, M. A. (2008). Action without perception in human vision. / Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 891鈥?19. CrossRef
  11. Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. / Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20鈥?5. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8 CrossRef
  12. Hu, Y., & Goodale, M. A. (2000). Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. / Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 856鈥?68. CrossRef
  13. Janczyk, M., Franz, V. H., & Kunde, W. (2010). Grasping for parsimony: Do some motor actions escape dorsal processing? / Neuropsychologia, 48, 3405鈥?415. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.034 CrossRef
  14. Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2010). Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm. / Experimental Brain Research, 203, 89鈥?00. CrossRef
  15. Janssen, P., Srivastava, S., Ombelet, S., & Orban, G. A. (2008). Coding of shape and position in macaque lateral intraparietal area. / Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 6679鈥?690. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0499-08.2008 CrossRef
  16. Kohlfeld, D. L. (1971). Simple reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity in decibels of light and sound. / Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 251鈥?57. CrossRef
  17. Kunde, W., Landgraf, F., Paelecke, M., & Kiesel, A. (2007). Dorsal and ventral processing under dual-task conditions. / Psychological Science, 18, 100鈥?04. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01855.x CrossRef
  18. Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2006). / The visual brain in action (2nd ed.). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
  19. Milner, A. D., Perrett, D. I., Johnston, R. S., Benson, P. J., Jordan, T. R., Heeley, D. W., & Davidson, D. L. D. (1991). Perception and action in 鈥榲isual form agnosia鈥? / Brain, 114, 405鈥?28. CrossRef
  20. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. / Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220鈥?44. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220 CrossRef
  21. Schenk, T. (2010). Visuomotor robustness is based on integration not segregation. / Vision Research, 50, 2627鈥?632. CrossRef
  22. Schenk, T., Franz, V., & Bruno, N. (2011). Vision-for-perception and vision-for-action: Which model is compatible with the available psychophysical and neuropsychological data? / Vision Research, 51, 812鈥?18. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.02.003 CrossRef
  23. Smeets, J. B. J., & Brenner, E. (2006). 10聽years of illusions. / Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1501鈥?504. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1501 CrossRef
  24. Srivastava, S., Orban, G. A., De Mazi猫re, P. A., & Janssen, P. (2009). A distinct representation of three-dimensional shape in macaque anterior intraparietal area: Fast, metric, and coarse. / Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 10613鈥?0626. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6016-08.2009 CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Markus Janczyk (1)
  Wilfried Kunde (1)
  
  1. Department of Psychology III, University of W眉rzburg, R枚ntgenring 11, 97070, W眉rzburg, Germany
  

文摘

It has been suggested that the human brain processes visual information in different manners, depending on whether the information is used for perception or for action control. This distinction has been criticized for the lack of behavioral dissociations that unambiguously support the proposed two-visual-pathways model. Here we present a new and simple dissociation between vision for perception and vision for action: Perceptual judgments are affected by the similarity of relevant and irrelevant stimulus features, while object-oriented actions are not. This dissociation overcomes the methodological problems of previously proposed differences in terms of vulnerability to visual illusions or to variability in irrelevant object features, and it can also serve as an easily applicable behavioral indicator of underlying processing modes.